In this article, I will share how I was banned on the English subdomain of Wikipedia for political reasons, how a large number of information companies censor 'The One Who Must Not Be Named', really, type 'Eric Ciaramella' in a Youtube comment, try to edit it, and you'll get a 404 error (this is before you downvote in karma, the comment will be deleted, I bet). I will also discuss what I learned in the last month about Trump's impeachment and how I was shocked. The information war is already here. I hope that since I wrote about the end of Roskomnadzor (yes, that was supposed to be the title of that article if it weren't for UFO censorship), you will forgive me a bit of political commentary, which nevertheless is primarily about censorship. Additionally, the fact that this information is still not present in Russian media speaks in my favor.
So, I think you know that on January 15, 2020 (the date is accurate — check the Russian wiki, or else someone has already pointed this out to me) the President of the United States was impeached. But the story began a month earlier, on January 5. That day, I accidentally heard on a relative's TV that their president was facing the final stage of impeachment. I logged onto the English Wikipedia to understand what he was being accused of, but I never fully grasped it and decided to watch their session in the Congressional Legal Department live on CNN's Youtube channel. I was astonished to discover that congressmen think our tanks in Ukraine are killing Ukrainians (as one user puts it — this is ), and we have ripped apart their territory (let me remind you, 95.5% of Crimeans with a turnout of 89% voted for secession and joining Russia). And Trump blocked military aid to Ukraine, $400 million USD, motherfucker (their words), to extort investigations into Biden from Zelensky! He was also accused of believing that it was Ukraine (and not only Russia) that influenced the US elections in 2016 (Mueller's report), and they have a server (ha) DNC. Of course, there is such an article and , but this is absurd! Or maybe not. Considering the consequences.
Of course, at that time I didn't know they were all Democrats! Then I started watching everything on Twitter, etc., and in one place I saw that the possible name of the whistleblower against Trump was known. I looked at wiki again, but that information wasn't there. I tried to add a new topic on the article's discussion page, but Backlog for his name, I was not given that (by the way, this filter is only for Administrators and does not appear in general , which, as far as I understood, is a violation of the rules; at least, other Admins complained about this). I was surprised but dropped the matter. Then, some high-ranking admin wrote to me (left a message on the discussion page) that I did not have the right to leave this name on Wikipedia in principle! So I wrote to him, why was he monitoring me, I hadn't edited anything, and this admin sent another admin after me, who placed a topic ban on politics... Ha, at that time, I had only one edit in the politics section. This drove me insane. I quickly googled the reason, and it turns out !
Then I wrote to some familiar admins asking them to protect me from the topic ban and left a link to Reddit. The name was not mentioned anywhere (!). This led to a complete ban with oversight level exactly 10 seconds later! And I wrote to the Arbitration Committee of Wikipedia, but they also said they could not unban me (after 2 weeks).
What was the reason? I started looking for it right away. The amount of political horrors that poured onto me was just shocking (I had to switch from CNN to Fox News (the remnants, not bought by Disney), as only there were some facts). On YouTube, you absolutely cannot use the name Eric Ciaramella. Facebook also censors it. But Twitter does not. So I decided to follow #EricCiaramella on Twitter (without the a, because the censorship on Twitter also, as it turned out, exists). And I learned something interesting (one ). Namely, that he is dating the daughter of the main accuser in the Trump case — Adam Schiff! At that time, this was not known, but I wrote to independent journalists, and .
That's where the most interesting part began; I decided to keep track of this nonsense going on, everything can be summed up like this:
Globally, I figured out the following. First, The IG report on the FISA court in the US revealed in December that the Democratic Party's DNC created a fake Steele dossier using money from Hillary Clinton and information from Russian, Ukrainian, and British intelligence. This document was used to open an FBI investigation against Trump, accusing him of espionage for the Russians and to obtain surveillance warrants from the FISA court (which Snowden once described). In the process, the FBI lied to the FISA court 17 times to spy on Carter Page and Trump's associates. The head of this court (Rosemary M. Collyer) has already resigned, but whether this reformed court after Snowden will help is a big question. The CIA was involved too, as the director personally pressured former FBI director Comey.
It also discusses the director of Fusion GPS and how her husband, Bruce Ohr, at the FBI did everything to open the investigation without Trump knowing about it (even preventing an attempt to inform about the Russians threatening to leak Clinton's emails on WikiLeaks). Not to mention Lisa Page and Peter Strzok. Haha. Google it, it's just hilarious how they talked about "insurance" against Trump.
So, Congress voted for impeachment on December 19, with not a single Republican voting for it, and one Democrat even switched to the Republican Party. The articles of impeachment contained no crimes (only abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — regarding the second, Congress itself obstructed itself, as they should have gone to court to obtain documents and witnesses legally blocked by Trump). The number of violations committed by the Democrats is simply staggering (refusal to provide a minority day for Republicans, using a witness as a judge, providing all documents just days before the final vote on the weekend, etc.).
But, as they say, the devil is in the details. The biggest thing was related to Biden. about it on the Russian Wikipedia (sic!, I wasn't banned there, so I freely used it), where I wrote about this.
In December 2019, an investigation conducted by Rudy Giuliani and "One American News" revealed a strong likelihood that the Bidens were directly involved in laundering $14 million USD through Wirelogic Technology AS and Digitex organization LLP, which went offshore to Cyprus (Burisma Holding) via Latvia, as well as $7 billion USD through Franklin Templeton Investments. Shokin also believes the Biden family is guilty of his two mercury poisonings (both of which led to clinical death). The same investigation indicated that Yovanovitch provided lists of "uninvestigatable" individuals to Shokin's successor and lied during her testimony in the Trump impeachment case, while the U.S. embassy in Ukraine blocked visas for Shokin and other individuals.
Questions are welcome (both political (about Trump) and computer-related). I have sorted this all out fairly well. And this is just 1% of all the details I've gathered over 1 month.
Links.
In English only.
//это про прокурора за 1 миллиард
usatodaynews.live/328-rudolph-giuliani-released-the-findings-of-his-trip-to-ukraine-in-the-case-of-impeachment-trump.html // this is about the poisoning of that prosecutor
// расследования OAN
Like our Navalny.
, where I retweeted all the work of independent journalists, starting from the first post about the ban.
Cool, now I'm not so upset that I got banned 😉 It's a pity that the VPN for Wikipedia gets banned, so I have to switch to IPv6 LTE and Chrome Canary when I need to edit en Wikipedia!
P.S. Look at this , what do you think? Cute, right?
Only registered users can participate in the survey. , please.
The snitch in the article's picture and https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1200264512017813504?s=20
4,4%Similar1
13,0%Not Similar3
82,6%The whole article is nonsense, I'll explain why in the comments19
23 users voted. 13 users abstained.
Source: habr.com
