Due to the fact that 2020 is approaching and the “hour he”, when it will be necessary to report on the execution of the order of the Ministry of Communications on the transition to domestic software (as part of import substitution), I received the task of developing a plan, in fact, for the execution of the order of the Ministry of Communications and Mass Media communications No. 334 dated 29.06.2017/XNUMX/XNUMX. And I began to understand. And the first thing I came across was an article saying that Russian Helicopters had already done everything and that we should learn from their experience. But is everything so smooth? .. Let's look.
Not so long ago, the CIO of the Russian Helicopters holding, Mikhail Nosov, spoke about how they carried out the order of the Ministry of Communications on import substitution of software. I showed a presentation with numbers and benefits from switching to domestic software ... And everything would be fine, but there are a lot of inconsistencies there ...
So, in order.
To start -
This article is about the same on a bunch of sites, here It talks about “how to” switch to domestic software and all that ... But. Here is one of the first pictures, which shows a set of software and its cost per workstation:
And here I have a couple of questions:
- The cost of a Linux OS license. The fact is that Russian Helicopters is a military organization, the requirements for them are strict, they cannot take and deliver unverified software, only certified by the FSTEC or the Ministry of Defense. And the price of one such license for the same Astra Linux Special Edition, which, in fact, was introduced in Helicopters, at the moment is 14900 rubles. a piece. And on the slide we see 0 rub.
- For what purpose do you need Kaspersky for Linux? It didn't exist on Windows.
About SAMBA, Zabbix and the rest will be lower, don't worry.
Moving on.
Picture "Import substitution of the server segment":
What do we see here? Well, at least Q.Virt, which? .. That's right, it is also not included in the register of the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications, and therefore also does not fit. There are several software for virtualization in the registry, I quote the prices:
ROSA Virtualization 50 virtual machines cost 470 rubles, renewal of support for a year - 000 rubles.
ISPSystem VMmanager 1 knot 7 239 rub. Accordingly, 50 knots - 361 rubles.
SOFTWARE COMPLEX OF VIRTUALIZATION TOOLS "BREST" (based on AstraLinux) it’s basically hard to understand what they offer, but apparently it’s a hardware platform with virtualization capability and remote desktops, a mail server (some kind), a DBMS (some kind) and another set of software. RDP for 25 users costs 401 rubles. Basic version license, for small virtual infrastructures, for 280 servers (whatever that means) - 3 rubles.
The rest of the virtualization tools are not available for sale, which means that each Enterprise will have its own prices, and this is not really a business, so it makes no sense to consider them.
And then in order:
DNS-Astra Linux-based server is nothing more than BIND9. And it is not in the register of the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications. There is only DNSmanager, and it is paid from 50 domain names. You can use something other than BIND9, but this will also not be in the register of the Ministry of Communications ... That is, again a bug came out.
DHCP- the server in the register is not present in general. My research in the direction of software import substitution led to the fact that DHCP (and DNS) can only be legally raised on the basis of PINK Linux, they have their own DHCP server, but I have not yet figured out what it is based on ...
AD they replaced it with SAMBA... And again the same thing, it is not in the registry. ROSA has its own kind of authorization server, but I have not yet figured out what is under the hood.
Zabbix - same way. Although it was developed by our compatriot, it is not Russian software.
GLPI - same way.
bacula - there again...
Ansible - well, you understand ...
BUT. There is one big, zhiiirnoe such BUT. There is unofficial information that everything included in the OS delivery package is legitimate from the point of view of import substitution. I have not found this information officially. And this calls into question the whole idea of import substitution in its current state. Because all these packages are not domestic, but, as far as one can judge, they were checked and certified, that is, approved, and got into the register of the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications as part of the OS ... But if you put them separately from the repositories, it’s already low ... I xs, what here is the logic and how it works...
There is also a picture with the cost of a “typical server”:
That is, on a typical server, they had all this. On every server. VMware vSphere. On each. Not free Microsoft Hyper-V Core on virtualization cluster hosts, but on each server with VMware vSphere. And more on SQL Server on each. And SharePoint is still on top! I can see directly how their admins are smeared with licenses of SharePoint'a and MSSQLServer'a! Sorry, couldn't resist.
There is also a sign with the number of users (approximate, of course, but still indicative):
7000 users! And only 52 million rubles for support! True, this does not take into account virtualization hosts, OS support for 7000 copies, extension of support for the office suite ...
At the end I will giveThe recommended form of the schedule for the transition of enterprises, institutions, organizations subordinate to the state body to the use of domestic office software, as well as recommended indicators of the effectiveness of the transition to the use of domestic office software for the period 2017-2020«:
It does not say about 100% import substitution, which gives enough freedom for the flight of thought.
What conclusions can be drawn from all this? First, there is no need to rashly rush from the very first days after the bills are issued to implement these same bills, they will still have time to change ten times. The second is to carefully read these bills so that later employees do not have to be retrained from one office suite to another three times ...
Later, when I finish developing the import substitution plan, I will definitely share it so that there is no “everyone can criticize, but you take it and do it!”
about import substitution planning.
The prices for software given in the article are taken from the site .
Source: habr.com