LINQ tuli .NET-i uue vĂ”imsana andmehalduse keele. LINQ to SQL vĂ”imaldab selle osana suhelda andmebaasidega, nĂ€iteks Entity Frameworki kaudu, ĂŒsna mugavalt. Siiski, seda kasutades unustavad arendajad tihti vaadata, millist SQL-pĂ€ringut genereerib queryable provider, teie puhul â Entity Framework.
Vaatame kaht pÔhiaspekti nÀite abil.
Selleks loome SQL Serveris andmebaasi Test ning seal loome kaks tabelit jÀrgmise pÀringuga:
Tabelite loomine
USE [TEST]
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Ref](
[ID] [int] NOT NULL,
[ID2] [int] NOT NULL,
[Name] [nvarchar](255) NOT NULL,
[InsertUTCDate] [datetime] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Ref] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Ref] ADD CONSTRAINT [DF_Ref_InsertUTCDate] DEFAULT (getutcdate()) FOR [InsertUTCDate]
GO
USE [TEST]
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Customer](
[ID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Name] [nvarchar](255) NOT NULL,
[Ref_ID] [int] NOT NULL,
[InsertUTCDate] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[Ref_ID2] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Customer] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Customer] ADD CONSTRAINT [DF_Customer_Ref_ID] DEFAULT ((0)) FOR [Ref_ID]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Customer] ADD CONSTRAINT [DF_Customer_InsertUTCDate] DEFAULT (getutcdate()) FOR [InsertUTCDate]
GO
NĂŒĂŒd tĂ€idame tabeli Ref jĂ€rgmise skripti kĂ€ivitamisega:
Tabeli Ref tÀitmine
USE [TEST]
GO
DECLARE @ind INT=1;
WHILE(@ind<1200000)
BEGIN
INSERT INTO [dbo].[Ref]
([ID]
,[ID2]
,[Name])
SELECT
@ind
,@ind
,CAST(@ind AS NVARCHAR(255));
SET @ind=@ind+1;
END
GO
Samuti tÀidame tabeli Customer jÀrgmise skripti abil:
Tabeli Customer tÀitmine
KASUTA [TEST]
GO
DECLARE @ind INT=1;
DECLARE @ind_ref INT=1;
WHILE(@ind<=12000000)
BEGIN
IF(@ind%3=0) SET @ind_ref=1;
ELSE IF (@ind%5=0) SET @ind_ref=2;
ELSE IF (@ind%7=0) SET @ind_ref=3;
ELSE IF (@ind=0) SET @ind_ref=4;
ELSE IF (@ind=0) SET @ind_ref=5;
ELSE IF (@ind=0) SET @ind_ref=6;
ELSE IF (@ind=0) SET @ind_ref=7;
ELSE IF (@ind=0) SET @ind_ref=8;
ELSE IF (@ind=0) SET @ind_ref=9;
ELSE IF (@ind=0) SET @ind_ref=10;
ELSE IF (@ind=0) SET @ind_ref=11;
ELSE SET @ind_ref=@ind90000;
INSERT INTO [dbo].[Customer]
([ID]
,[Name]
,[Ref_ID]
,[Ref_ID2])
SELECT
@ind,
CAST(@ind AS NVARCHAR(255)),
@ind_ref,
@ind_ref;
SET @ind=@ind+1;
END
GO
Nii saime kaks tabelit, milles ĂŒhes on ĂŒle 1 miljoni andmerea ja teises ĂŒle 10 miljoni andmerea.
NĂŒĂŒd on Visual Studio-s vajalik luua testprojekt Visual C# Console App (.NET Framework):

Edasi tuleb andmebaasiga suhtlemiseks lisada Entity Frameworki teek.
Selle lisamiseks klĂ”psame projektil parema hiireklahviga ja valime kontekstimenĂŒĂŒst Manage NuGet Packages:

SeejĂ€rel sisestame avanevas NuGet-pakettide haldamise aknas otsinguvĂ€ljale sĂ”na âEntity Frameworkâ ja valime paketi Entity Framework ning installime selle:

JÀrgmisena peame faili App.config pÀrast elemendi configSections sulgemist lisama jÀrgmise ploki:
connectionString'i tuleb sisestada ĂŒhenduse string.
NĂŒĂŒd loome kolmes eraldi failis 3 liidest:
- Liidese IBaseEntityID rakendus
namespace TestLINQ { public interface IBaseEntityID { int ID { get; set; } } } - Liidese IBaseEntityName rakendus
namespace TestLINQ { public interface IBaseEntityName { string Name { get; set; } } } - Liidese IBaseNameInsertUTCDate rakendus
namespace TestLINQ { public interface IBaseNameInsertUTCDate { DateTime InsertUTCDate { get; set; } } }
Ja eraldi failis loome pĂ”hiklasi BaseEntity meie kahe entiteedi jaoks, kuhu kuuluvad ĂŒhised vĂ€ljad:
PÔhiklassi BaseEntity rakendus
namespace TestLINQ
{
public class BaseEntity : IBaseEntityID, IBaseEntityName, IBaseNameInsertUTCDate
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public DateTime InsertUTCDate { get; set; }
}
}
SeejÀrel loome eraldi failidesse meie kaks entiteeti:
- Klassi Ref rakendus
using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.Schema; namespace TestLINQ { [Table("Ref")] public class Ref : BaseEntity { public int ID2 { get; set; } } } - Klassi Customer rakendus
using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.Schema; namespace TestLINQ { [Table("Customer")] public class Customer: BaseEntity { public int Ref_ID { get; set; } public int Ref_ID2 { get; set; } } }
NĂŒĂŒd loome eraldi failis konteksti UserContext:
Klassi UserContext rakendus
using System.Data.Entity;
namespace TestLINQ
{
public class UserContext : DbContext
{
public UserContext()
: base("DbConnection")
{
Database.SetInitializer(null);
}
public DbSet Customer { get; set; }
public DbSet Ref { get; set; }
}
}
Oleme saanud valmis lahenduse testide lÀbiviimiseks optimeerimise osas LINQ to SQL kaudu EF jaoks MS SQL Serveris:

NĂŒĂŒd sisestame faili Program.cs jĂ€rgmise koodi:
Fail Program.cs
kasutades System;
kasutades System.Collections.Generic;
kasutades System.Linq;
(nimi TestLINQ
{
klass Program
{
staatiline void Main(string[] args)
{
kasutades (UserContext db = new UserContext())
{
var dblog = new List();
db.Database.Log = dblog.Add;
var query = from e1 in db.Customer
from e2 in db.Ref
where (e1.Ref_ID == e2.ID)
&& (e1.Ref_ID2 == e2.ID2)
select new { Data1 = e1.Name, Data2 = e2.Name };
var result = query.Take(1000).ToList();
Console.WriteLine(dblog[1]);
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
}
}
JÀtkame meie projekti kÀivitamist.
Töö lÔpetamisel prinditakse konsoolile:
Genereeritud SQL-pÀring
SELECT TOP (1000)
[Extent1].[Ref_ID] AS [Ref_ID],
[Extent1].[Name] AS [Name],
[Extent2].[Name] AS [Name1]
FROM [dbo].[Customer] AS [Extent1]
INNER JOIN [dbo].[Ref] AS [Extent2] ON ([Extent1].[Ref_ID] = [Extent2].[ID]) AND ([Extent1].[Ref_ID2] = [Extent2].[ID2])
See tĂ€hendab, et kokkuvĂ”ttes genereeris LINQ pĂ€ring ĂŒsna korraliku SQL-pĂ€ringu MS SQL Serveri andmebaasile.
NĂŒĂŒd muutke LINQ-pĂ€ringus JAH tingimus EI asemel.
LINQ-pÀring
var query = from e1 in db.Customer
from e2 in db.Ref
where (e1.Ref_ID == e2.ID)
|| (e1.Ref_ID2 == e2.ID2)
select new { Data1 = e1.Name, Data2 = e2.Name };
Ja kÀivitame taas oma rakenduse.
TĂ€ideviimisel ilmneb viga, mis on seotud kĂ€su tĂ€itmisaja ĂŒletamisega 30 sekundi jooksul:

Kui vaatamata sellele, milline pÀring on LINQ-i poolt genereeritud.

, siis vÔib veenduda, et valik toimub kahe hulga (tabeli) kartesiaansest korrutamisest:
Genereeritud SQL-pÀring
SELECT TOP (1000)
[Extent1].[Ref_ID] AS [Ref_ID],
[Extent1].[Name] AS [Name],
[Extent2].[Name] AS [Name1]
FROM [dbo].[Customer] AS [Extent1]
CROSS JOIN [dbo].[Ref] AS [Extent2]
WHERE [Extent1].[Ref_ID] = [Extent2].[ID] OR [Extent1].[Ref_ID2] = [Extent2].[ID2]
Ăks vĂ”imalus on kirjutada LINQ-pĂ€ring jĂ€rgmiselt:
Optimeeritud LINQ-pÀring
var query = (from e1 in db.Customer
join e2 in db.Ref
on e1.Ref_ID equals e2.ID
select new { Data1 = e1.Name, Data2 = e2.Name }).Union(
from e1 in db.Customer
join e2 in db.Ref
on e1.Ref_ID2 equals e2.ID2
select new { Data1 = e1.Name, Data2 = e2.Name });
Siis saame jÀrgmise SQL-pÀringu:
SQL-pÀring
VALISELECT
[Limit1].[C1] AS [C1],
[Limit1].[C2] AS [C2],
[Limit1].[C3] AS [C3]
FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT TOP (1000)
[UnionAll1].[C1] AS [C1],
[UnionAll1].[Name] AS [C2],
[UnionAll1].[Name1] AS [C3]
FROM (SELECT
1 AS [C1],
[Extent1].[Name] AS [Name],
[Extent2].[Name] AS [Name1]
FROM [dbo].[Customer] AS [Extent1]
INNER JOIN [dbo].[Ref] AS [Extent2] ON [Extent1].[Ref_ID] = [Extent2].[ID]
UNION ALL
SELECT
1 AS [C1],
[Extent3].[Name] AS [Name],
[Extent4].[Name] AS [Name1]
FROM [dbo].[Customer] AS [Extent3]
INNER JOIN [dbo].[Ref] AS [Extent4] ON [Extent3].[Ref_ID2] = [Extent4].[ID2]) AS [UnionAll1]
) AS [Limit1]
Kahjuks LINQ-kĂŒsimustes vĂ”ib liitumise tingimus olla ainult ĂŒks, seega on vĂ”imalik teha ekvivalentne pĂ€ring kahe pĂ€ringuga, et iga tingimus eraldi ja seejĂ€rel ĂŒhendada need Unioniga, et eemaldada ridade vahelised duplikaadid.
Jah, pĂ€ringud on eriti juhul mitteekvivalentsed, kuna ka tĂ€ielikud duplikaadid vĂ”ivad tagasi tulla. Siiski, reaalses elus ei ole tĂ€ielikud duplikaadid vajalikud ja neist pĂŒĂŒtakse vabaneda.
VĂ”rdleme nĂŒĂŒd nende kahe pĂ€ringu tĂ€itmise plaane:
- CROSS JOINi keskmine tÀitmise aeg on 195 sek:

- INNER JOIN-UNIONi keskmine tÀitmise aeg on alla 24 sek:

Nagu nÀhtub tulemustest, töötab kahe miljoni kirje puhul optimeeritud LINQ-pÀring kordades kiiremini kui mitteoptimeeritud.
Jaotisega, kus on ja LINQ-pÀringu tingimus:
LINQ-pÀring
var query = from e1 in db.Customer
from e2 in db.Ref
where (e1.Ref_ID == e2.ID)
&& (e1.Ref_ID2 == e2.ID2)
select new { Data1 = e1.Name, Data2 = e2.Name };
peaaegu alati genereeritakse Ôige SQL-pÀring, mille tÀitmise keskmine on umbes 1 sek:

Samuti LINQ to Objects manipuleerimise korral vÔite kasutada jÀrgmist pÀringut:
LINQ-pÀring (1. variant)
var query = from e1 in seq1
from e2 in seq2
where (e1.Key1==e2.Key1)
&& (e1.Key2==e2.Key2)
select new { Data1 = e1.Data, Data2 = e2.Data };
vÔite kasutada jÀrgnevat pÀringut:
LINQ-pÀring (2. variant)
var query = from e1 in seq1
join e2 in seq2
on new { e1.Key1, e1.Key2 } equals new { e2.Key1, e2.Key2 }
select new { Data1 = e1.Data, Data2 = e2.Data };
kus:
Kahes massiivi mÀÀratlemine
Para[] seq1 = new[] { new Para { Key1 = 1, Key2 = 2, Data = "777" }, new Para { Key1 = 2, Key2 = 3, Data = "888" }, new Para { Key1 = 3, Key2 = 4, Data = "999" } };
Para[] seq2 = new[] { new Para { Key1 = 1, Key2 = 2, Data = "777" }, new Para { Key1 = 2, Key2 = 3, Data = "888" }, new Para { Key1 = 3, Key2 = 5, Data = "999" } };
, ja tĂŒĂŒpi Para mÀÀratlemine on jĂ€rgmine:
TĂŒĂŒbi Para mÀÀratlemine
class Para
{
public int Key1, Key2;
public string Data;
}
Nii, me oleme vaadanud mÔningaid aspekte LINQ-pÀringute optimeerimisel MS SQL Serveri jaoks.
Kahjuks unustavad isegi kogenud ja juhtivad .NET-arendajad, et nad peavad aru saama, mida teevad nende kasutatavad kĂ€sud. Muul juhul muutuvad nad seadistajateks ja vĂ”ivad tulevikus, nii suurendades programmirakendust kui ka vĂ€ikesi keskkonna muutusi, kĂŒlvata aja pommi.
Samuti tehti vĂ€ikene ĂŒlevaade ja .
Allikad testimiseks - projekt, tabelite loomine andmebaasis TEST, ning nende tabelite andmetega tÀitmine on .
Samuti asub selles repositooriumis kaustas Plans pÀringute tÀitmise plaanid, millel on tingimused OR.
Allikas: habr.com


