Ma kirjutan palju tekste, enamasti igasugust jama, kuid tavaliselt ĂŒtlevad isegi vihkajad, et tekst on kergesti loetav. Kui soovite oma tekste (nĂ€iteks kirju) kergemaks muuta, minge siia.
Siin ei ole ma midagi vĂ€lja mĂ”elnud, kĂ”ik on raamatust âElav ja surnud sĂ”naâ Nora Galilt, nĂ”ukogude tĂ”lkijalt, toimetajalt ja kriitikult.
Reeglid on kaks: tegusĂ”na ja ei mingit bĂŒrokraatiat.
TegusĂ”na on tegevus. TegusĂ”na muudab teksti dĂŒnaamiliseks, huvitavaks, elavaks. Ăkski teine sĂ”naliik ei oska seda.
TegusĂ”na antonĂŒĂŒm on tegusĂ”nast tuletatud nimisĂ”na. See on kĂ”ige hullem kurjus. TegusĂ”nast tuletatud nimisĂ”na on nimisĂ”na, mis on tuletatud tegusĂ”nast.
NĂ€iteks: teostamine, rakendamine, planeerimine, implementeerimine, kasutamine jne.
Halvim tegusÔnast tuletatud nimisÔna on ainult tegusÔnast tuletatud nimisÔnade ahel. NÀiteks, teostamine planeerimise, rakendamine rakendamise implementeerimise.
Reegel on lihtne: seal, kus on vĂ”imalik, asendage tegusĂ”nast tuletatud nimisĂ”nad tegusĂ”nadega. VĂ”i normaalsed nimisĂ”nad, millel pole tegusĂ”na-sĂŒnonĂŒĂŒmi.
NĂŒĂŒd bĂŒrokraatiast. Et teada, vĂ”i tĂ€psemalt â meenutada, mis on bĂŒrokraatia, lugege mĂ”nda seadust, mÀÀrust (sh ettevĂ”tte sisemised dokumendid) vĂ”i oma diplomit.
BĂŒrokraatia on teksti kunstlikult keeruliseks muutmine, et see tunduks targem vĂ”i sobituks mingitesse raamidesse (Ă€ri-, teaduslikku avalikku stiili jne).
Lihtsamalt öeldes, kui proovite tunduda targemana, kui olete, kui kirjutate teksti â loote bĂŒrokraatiat.
TegusĂ”nast tuletatud nimisĂ”nade kasutamine on samuti bĂŒrokraatia. Osalised ja tegusĂ”naosad on bĂŒrokraatia tunnus. Eriti kui on terve ahel lauseid, lisandeid, keerulisi ja alalehitavaid lauseid (kĂ”ik, meenutage kooliprogrammi).
Osalised ja tegusĂ”naosad eristuvad seda, et neil on, ĂŒtleme nii, sĂ”na-pĂ”hi. NĂ€iteks: Irina, kes lahendab ĂŒlesannet. Juba kĂ”lab veidi vastikult, kuid soovi korral saab selle tĂ€iesti loetamatuks teha.
Irina, solving a problem, resembles a small, utterly confused child who, thinking he knows something about this life that has unexpectedly fallen upon him (well, he is already lost...), sincerely believes that the computer, rightfully his, will endure forever, silently, without ever baring its teeth, like a dog smelling of yesterday's rain (darn, what was I trying to say with this sentenceâŠ).
On one hand, you could bury yourself in these rules and write sentences that are a page long, like Leo Tolstoy. So that students suffer later.
But there is a simple solution that will prevent you from ruining a sentence. Keep your sentences short. Not "It was getting dark," of course - I think one to two line sentences will suffice, not more. By following this rule, you won't get lost.
Yes, and itâs better to keep paragraphs small. In todayâs world, there is the so-called "clip thinking" â a person is unable to process large chunks of information. Itâs necessary, just like with a child, to divide a cutlet into small pieces so that he can eat them himself with his fork. If not divided, you'll have to sit next to him and feed him.
Well, itâs simple from here. Next time you write a text, read it before sending, and find: nominalized verbs, participial and gerund phrases, sentences longer than one line, paragraphs thicker than five lines. And revise them.
Allikas: habr.com
