{"id":92116,"date":"2020-08-23T19:42:14","date_gmt":"2020-08-23T17:42:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/blog\/administrirovanie\/tak-tak-tak-i-nikakogo-tika-chem-otlichayutsya-proczessory-intel-core-raznyh-pokolenij-na-osnove-odnoj-arhitektury"},"modified":"2020-08-23T19:42:14","modified_gmt":"2020-08-23T17:42:14","slug":"tak-tak-tak-i-nikakogo-tika-chem-otlichayutsya-proczessory-intel-core-raznyh-pokolenij-na-osnove-odnoj-arhitektury","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/blog\/administrirovanie\/tak-tak-tak-i-nikakogo-tika-chem-otlichayutsya-proczessory-intel-core-raznyh-pokolenij-na-osnove-odnoj-arhitektury","title":{"rendered":"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/50f68eb8971617360008007e4c4fb35b.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n<br \/>\nIntel Core'i seitsmenda p\u00f5lvkonna protsessorite tulekuga sai paljudele selgeks, et Intel'i \"Tick-Tock\" strateegia, millele nad on seni toetunud, on eba\u00f5nnestunud. Lubadus v\u00e4hendada tehnoloogilist protsessi 14-lt 10 nm-ile j\u00e4i lubaduseks ning algas pikk \"Tock\" ajastu Skylake, mille k\u00e4igus ilmus Kaby Lake (seitsmes p\u00f5lvkond), ootamatu Coffee Lake (kaheksas), millel oli vaid v\u00e4ike muutus tehnoloogiaprotsessis 14 nm-lt 14 nm+-le ja isegi Coffee Lake Refresh (\u00fcheksas). Tundub, et Intelil oli t\u00f5esti vaja v\u00e4ikest kohvipausi. L\u00f5pptulemuseks on meile mitmed erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest protsessorid, mis on loodud \u00fche ja sama mikroarhitektuuri Skylake alusel, \u00fchel pool. Ja Intel'i kinnitused, et iga uus protsessor on parem kui eelmine, teisest k\u00fcljest. T\u00f5si, pole p\u00e4ris selge, mille poolest\u2026<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/0fe80826fc8b808c173606441982d49b.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n<br \/>\nSeega naaseme j\u00e4lle meie p\u00f5lvkondade juurde. Ja vaatame, millega nad erinevad.<br \/>\n<noindex><a rel=\"nofollow\" name=\"habracut\"><\/a><\/noindex><br \/>\n<b>Kaby Lake<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Protsessorite turule tulek toimus 2017. aasta alguses. Mis on selle pereliikme uued omadused v\u00f5rreldes eelk\u00e4ijaga? Esiteks on see uus graafikatuum \u2014 Intel UHD 630. Lisaks Intel Optane m\u00e4lu (3D Xpoint) toe lisamine ja uus 200. seeria chipset (6. p\u00f5lvkond t\u00f6\u00f6tas 100. seeria chipsetiga). Ja see oli k\u00f5ik, mis t\u00f5eliselt huvitavat esile t\u00f5i. <\/p>\n<p><b>Coffee Lake<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Kaheksanda p\u00f5lvkonna, koodnimega Coffee Lake, t\u00f5i turule 2017. aasta l\u00f5pus. Selle p\u00f5lvkonna protsessorites lisati tuuma ja vastavalt suurenes ka kolmanda taseme vahem\u00e4lu, t\u00f5steti Turbo Boost 200 MHz v\u00f5rra, lisati DDR4-2666 tugi (enne seda oli DDR4-2400), kuid DDR3 tugi eemaldati. Graafikatuum j\u00e4i samaks, kuid sellele lisati 50 MHz. K\u00f5ik sageduste t\u00f5usud t\u00e4hendasid, et soojuspaket t\u00f5usis 95 watini. Ja muidugi, uus 300. seeria chipsets. Viimane polnud sugugi vajalik, kuna spetsialistid suutsid selle pereliikmed kiiresti t\u00f6\u00f6le saada 100. seeria chipsetides, kuigi Intel'i esindajad v\u00e4itsid, et see pole v\u00f5imalik toiteahelate \u00fclesehituse erip\u00e4ra t\u00f5ttu. Hiljem tunnustas Intel ametlikult, et nad eksisid. Mis siis on uut kaheksanda p\u00f5lvkonna peres? Tegelikult n\u00e4eb see rohkem v\u00e4lja nagu tavaline v\u00e4rskendus koos tuumade ja sageduste lisamisega.<\/p>\n<p><b>Coffee Lake Refresh<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Haha! And here comes the refresh! In the fourth quarter of 2018, Coffee Lake 9th generation processors were released, equipped with hardware protections against some Meltdown\/Spectre vulnerabilities. The hardware changes made in the new chips protect against Meltdown V3 and L1 Terminal Fault (L1TF Foreshadow). Software and microcode changes protect against Spectre V2, Meltdown V3a, and V4 attacks. Protection against Spectre V1 will still be provided through operating system-level patches. The introduction of fixes at the hardware level should reduce the impact of software patches on processor performance. However, all this joy with protections was implemented by Intel only in processors for the mass market: i5-9600k, i7-9700k, i9-9900k. Everyone else, including server solutions, did not receive hardware protections. For the first time in the history of consumer processors, Intel's Coffee Lake processors support up to 128 GB of RAM. And that's it, no more changes.<\/p>\n<p>So, what do we have in the end? Two years of refreshes, games with cores and frequencies, plus a set of minor improvements. I really wanted to objectively assess and compare the performance of the main representatives of these families. Therefore, when I got my hands on a set from the seventh to the ninth generation \u2014 our i7-7700 and i7-7700k were recently joined by the fresh i7-8700, i7-9700k, and i9-9900k, I took the opportunity and made five different Intel Core processors show what they are capable of. <\/p>\n<p><b>Testimine<\/b><\/p>\n<p>The testing involves five Intel processors: i7-7700, i7-7700k, i7-8700, i7-9700k, i9-9900k.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/ff5fc14062a30d7bcc7b23b7ac893d9d.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n <br \/>\n<b>Taktikalis-tehnilised spetsifikatsioonid<\/b><\/p>\n<p>The Intel i7-8700, i7-9700k, and i9-9900k processors have the same base configuration:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310T (BIOS 1405),<\/li>\n<li> RAM: 16 GB DDR4-2400 MT\/s Kingston (2 pieces), totaling 32 GB.<\/li>\n<li> SSD drive: 240 GB Patriot Burst (2 pieces in RAID 1, a habit developed over the years).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\nThe Intel i7-7700 and i7-7700k processors also operate on the same platform:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Motherboard: Asus H110T (BIOS 3805),<\/li>\n<li>RAM: 8 GB DDR4-2400 MT\/s Kingston (2 pieces), totaling 16 GB.<\/li>\n<li>SSD-ketas: 240 GB Patriot Burst 2 t\u00fckki RAID 1-s.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\nWe use custom-made chassis with a height of 1.5 units. Four platforms are placed in them.<\/p>\n<p>Software: OS CentOS Linux 7 x86_64 (7.6.1810).<br \/>\nKernel: 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64<br \/>\nOptimizations made compared to the standard installation: kernel boot options added: elevator=noop selinux=0.<\/p>\n<p>Testimine toimub k\u00f5igi Spectre, Meltdown ja Foreshadow r\u00fcnnakute plaastritega, mis on selle tuuma tagasiviidud. Pole v\u00e4listatud, et testitulemused uuematelt ja aktuaalsematelt Linuxi tuumadelt v\u00f5ivad erineda ja n\u00e4itajad v\u00f5ivad olla paremad. Ent, esiteks, mulle isiklikult meeldib CentOS 7 rohkem, ja teiseks, RedHat t\u00f6\u00f6tab aktiivselt uute tuumadega seoses seadme toe t\u00e4iustuste tagasiviimisega oma LTS-sse. Seda ma ka loodan \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p><b>Testid, mida kasutasin uurimiseks<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Sysbench<\/li>\n<li>Geekbench<\/li>\n<li>Phoronix Test Suite<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>\n<b>Sysbench test<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Sysbench on testide (v\u00f5i b\u00e4nkimise pakett) kogum, mida kasutatakse arvuti erinevate alams\u00fcsteemide j\u00f5udluse hindamiseks: protsessor, t\u00f6\u00f6m\u00e4lu, andmehoidlad. Test on mitme tuumaga, k\u00f5igi tuumadega. Selles testis m\u00f5\u00f5tsin kahte n\u00e4itajat:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>CPU speed events per second \u2014 protsessori sekundi jooksul teostatavate operatsioonide arv: mida k\u00f5rgem v\u00e4\u00e4rtus, seda tootlikum on s\u00fcsteem.<\/li>\n<li>General statistics total number of events \u2014 teostatavate s\u00fcndmuste koguarv. Mida k\u00f5rgem n\u00e4itaja, seda parem.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>\n<b>Geekbench test<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Testide pakett, mis toimub \u00fchesuunalises ja mitmesuunalises re\u017eiimis. Tulemuseks on mingisugune j\u00f5udluse indeks m\u00f5lemas re\u017eiimis. Allpool on lingid testide tulemustele. Selles testis vaatame kahte p\u00f5hin\u00e4itajat: <br \/>\n \u2014 Single-Core Score \u2014 \u00fchesuunalised testid.<br \/>\n \u2014 Multi-Core Score \u2014 mitmesuunalised testid. <br \/>\nM\u00f5\u00f5t\u00fchikud: abstraktsed \"papagoid\". Mida rohkem \"papagoisid\", seda parem.<\/p>\n<p><b>Phoronix Test Suite test<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Phoronix Test Suite on v\u00e4ga rikas testide kogum. Kuigi k\u00f5ik pts\/cpu paketi testid on l\u00e4bi viidud, toon v\u00e4lja ainult need, mis mulle isiklikult tundusid eriti huvitavad, veel enam, et puudu j\u00e4\u00e4vate testide tulemused vaid kinnitavad \u00fcldist tendentsi. <\/p>\n<p>Peaaegu k\u00f5ik siin esitatud testid on mitme tuumaga. Erandiks on vaid kaks neist: \u00fchesuunalised testid Himeno ja LAME MP3 Encoding.<\/p>\n<p><b>Nendes testides mida suurem n\u00e4itaja, seda parem<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Mitme suunaline test John the Ripper paroolide purustamiseks. V\u00f5tame kr\u00fcptoalgoritmi Blowfish. M\u00f5\u00f5dab operatsioonide arvu sekundis. <\/li>\n<li>Himeno test \u2014 lineaarne Poissoni r\u00f5hu lahendaja, mis kasutab punktmeetodit Jacobi. <\/li>\n<li>7-Zip Compression \u2014 7-Zipi test, kasutades p7zip koos integreeritud j\u00f5udluse testimise funktsiooniga.<\/li>\n<li>OpenSSL on t\u00f6\u00f6riistade kogum, mis rakendab SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) ja TLS (Transport Layer Security) protokolle. M\u00f5\u00f5dab RSA 4096-bitise OpenSSL-i j\u00f5udlust. <\/li>\n<li>Apache Benchmark \u2014 test m\u00f5\u00f5dab, kui palju p\u00e4ringuid sekundis suudab antud s\u00fcsteem taluda, tehes 1 000 000 p\u00e4ringut, samal ajal kui 100 p\u00e4ringut t\u00e4idetakse korraga. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>\n<b>Ja nendes, kui v\u00e4iksem, siis parem <\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>C-Ray testib CPU j\u00f5udlust arvutustes, mis sisaldavad ujukoma numbreid. See test on mitme l\u00f5imega (16 l\u00f5ime tuuma kohta), tulistab igast pikslist 8 kiirt, et sujuvamalt toota pilti 1600&#215;1200. Ajavahemik testi l\u00f5petamiseks m\u00f5\u00f5detakse. <\/li>\n<li>Paralleelne BZIP2 kompressioon \u2014 test m\u00f5\u00f5dab aega, mis kulub faili (.tar Linuxi tuuma l\u00e4htekood) BZIP2 tihendamiseks. <\/li>\n<li>Audio- ja videomaterjali kodeerimine. LAME MP3 Encoding test viiakse l\u00e4bi \u00fchesuunalises re\u017eiimis, samas kui ffmpeg x264 test on mitmesuunaline. m\u00f5\u00f5detakse testi l\u00e4bimise aega. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>\nNagu n\u00e4ete, sisaldab testimiskomplekt rangelt s\u00fcnteetilisi teste, mis n\u00e4itavad erinevust protsessorite vahel teatud \u00fclesannete t\u00e4itmisel, n\u00e4iteks paroolide kl\u00f5psamine, meediainfode kodeerimine, kr\u00fcptograafia.<\/p>\n<p>S\u00fcntetiline test, erinevalt testist, mis viiakse l\u00e4bi reaalsusele l\u00e4hedastes tingimustes, suudab tagada katse teatud puhtuse. Just seet\u00f5ttu langes valik s\u00fcntetika kasuks. <\/p>\n<p>Pole v\u00e4listatud, et eritingimustes t\u00e4iendavate \u00fclesannete lahendamisel v\u00f5ite saada \u00e4\u00e4rmiselt huvitavaid ja ootamatuid tulemusi, kuid siiski on \u201e\u00fcldine temperatuuri keskmine\u201c maksimaalselt l\u00e4hedane sellele, mida ma sain testide tulemustes. Samuti ei saa v\u00e4listada, et kui v\u00e4lja l\u00fclitada Spectre\/Meltdown kaitse 9. p\u00f5lvkonna protsessorite testimise ajal, v\u00f5iksin saada k\u00f5rgemaid tulemusi. Kuid edasiba lugedes \u00fctlen - nad n\u00e4itasid end niigi suurep\u00e4raselt.<\/p>\n<p>Spoiler: valitsejatena on teemad s\u00fcdamikud, vood ja sagedused.<\/p>\n<p>Veel enne testimist uurisin hoolikalt nende protsessorite perede arhitektuuri, seet\u00f5ttu ootasid, et katsealuste vahel olulisi erinevusi pole. Ja mitte niiv\u00f5rd olulisi kui erakordseid: miks oodata huvitavaid n\u00e4itajaid testides, kui teostate m\u00f5\u00f5tmisi protsessoritel, mis on p\u00f5him\u00f5tteliselt ehitatud \u00fchel ja samal s\u00fcdame jaoks. Mu ootused osutusid \u00f5igeks, kuid m\u00f5ned asjad ei olnud siiski t\u00e4pselt sellised, nagu ma arvasin\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Ja n\u00fc\u00fcd, sisuliselt testide tulemused. <\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/c4e7d0c96fe4ca8f3ade9411a35a5db2.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n <br \/>\nTulemus on t\u00e4iesti loogiline: kellel on rohkem vooge ja k\u00f5rgem sagedus, sellel on ka rohkem punkte. Vastavalt on i7-8700 ja i9-9900k eespool. Erinevus i7-7700 ja i7-7700k vahel on 10% \u00fchesuunalises ja mitmesuunalises testis. i7-7700 k\u00e4rpimine i7-8700 ees on 38% ja i9-9900k ees 49%, mis t\u00e4hendab peaaegu 2 korda, kuid samal ajal on i7-7700 ja i7-9700k vahe vaid 15%.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/1b8152df5808c42619ac59eacee2ccca.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n<br \/>\nLingid testide tulemustele:<\/p>\n<p><noindex><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/browser.geekbench.com\/v4\/cpu\/11876104\">Intel i7-7700<\/a><\/noindex><br \/>\n<noindex><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/browser.geekbench.com\/v4\/cpu\/11877446\">Intel i7-7700k<\/a><\/noindex><br \/>\n<noindex><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/browser.geekbench.com\/v4\/cpu\/11823518\">Intel i7-8700<\/a><\/noindex><br \/>\n<noindex><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/browser.geekbench.com\/v4\/cpu\/11822880\">Intel i7-9700k<\/a><\/noindex><br \/>\n<noindex><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/browser.geekbench.com\/v4\/cpu\/11823325\">Intel i9-9900k<\/a><\/noindex><\/p>\n<p><b>Testide tulemused The Phoronix Test Suite'i pakist<\/b><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/439d71afc19c01ad805cac77f083cf5e.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n<br \/>\nJohn The Ripper testis on vahe venna-twin i7-7700 ja i7-7700k vahel 10% k-i kasuks, t\u00e4nu erinevusele Turbo Boostis. i7-8700 ja i7-9700k protsessorite vahel on vahe \u00fcsna v\u00e4henenud. i9-9900k \u00fcletab k\u00f5iki suurema voogude arvu ja k\u00f5rgema taktsageduse t\u00f5ttu. Twinid on m\u00e4rkamatult peaaegu 2 korda.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/259cd127217b3803f79cec522ba8beea.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n<br \/>\nC-Ray testi tulemus tundub mulle k\u00f5ige huvitavam. Hyper-Threading tehnoloogia olemasolu i9-9900k puhul annab selle mitme voolu testis vaid ebaolulise t\u00f5usu i7-9700k suhtes. Kuid kaksikvennad j\u00e4id liidrist peaaegu 2 korda maha.<\/p>\n<p>\n<img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/ff57885e92f03a156067dfb49a63dbe5.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n<br \/>\n\u00dche s\u00fcdamiku testis Himeno ei ole vahe nii suur. Tunnusjoon 8. ja 9. p\u00f5lvkonna vahel on, et i9-9900k edestab neid 18% ja 15% vastavalt. i7-8700 ja i7-9700k vahe on vahemikus m\u00f5\u00f5tmisvea piiresse.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/0cbf742b1a9cf510ac905ca5ceac0e09.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n<br \/>\n7zipi kompressioonitestis saavutavad kaksikprotsessorid 44-48% halvemad tulemused kui liider i9-9900k. Rohkemate niitide t\u00f5ttu edestab i7-8700 i7-9700k 9%. Kuid seda ei piisa, et i9-9900k \u00fcletada, mist\u00f5ttu n\u00e4eme peaaegu 18% mahaj\u00e4\u00e4must. <\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/ef72fd10957113dc6ac70bf2fb25c057.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n <br \/>\nBZIP2 algoritmiga kokku surumise testi tulemused on sarnased: vood v\u00f5idavad.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/60b2f765ca1c7e2d04549cbaeda46328.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n<br \/>\nMP3 kodeerimine \u2014 \"trepp\", mille maksimaalne vahe on 19,5%. Kuid ffmpeg testis j\u00e4\u00e4b i9-9900k i7-8700 ja i7-9700k-st taha, kuid \u00fcletab kaksikprotsessoreid. Olen mitu korda seda testi i9-9900k jaoks \u00fcmber teinud, kuid tulemus on alati sama. See on t\u00f5eliselt \u00fcllatav \ud83d\ude42 Mitme niitide testis n\u00e4itas k\u00f5ige rohkem niite sisaldav protsessor nii madalat tulemust, madalam kui 9700k ja 8700. Selle n\u00e4htuse suhtes ei ole selgeid seletusi, ja ma ei taha spekuleerida.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/fd44ffccee566297e6dc953183355d09.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n<br \/>\nOpenschl testi tulemused n\u00e4itavad \"treppi\" teise ja kolmanda astme vahel. Vahe kaksikprotsessorite ja liider i9-9900k vahel on 42% kuni 47%. Vahe i7-8700 ja i9-9900k vahel on 14%. Peamine on vood ja sagedused.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/4c6c8529fbf2d3e67cd2bddd34dfec92.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n <br \/>\nApache testis edestas i7-9700k k\u00f5iki, sealhulgas i9-9900k-d (6%). Kuid \u00fcldiselt pole vahe t\u00e4helepanuv\u00e4\u00e4rne, kuigi halvem tulemuse i7-7700 ja parim i7-9700k vahel on 24%.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tikk-tikki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core protsessorid erinevatest p\u00f5lvkondadest, mis baseeruvad \u00fchel arhitektuuril.\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/d176a698495d5de9545a8a897874bca1.png\" style=\"display:block;margin: 0 auto;\" \/><br \/>\n <br \/>\n\u00dcldiselt on enamikus testides liidiks i9-9900k, vaid ffmpegis on tulemused kehvemad. Kui kavatsete t\u00f6\u00f6tada videoga, valige parem i7-9700k v\u00f5i i7-8700. Teisel kohal kokkuv\u00f5ttes on i7-9700k, mis j\u00e4\u00e4b liidrist veidi taha, ja ffmpeg ja apache testides isegi \u00fcletab. Seega soovitan seda ja i9-9900k kalduvalt neile, kellel on regulaarseid suuri k\u00fclastusvooge saidile. Protsessorid ei peta teid. Videost olen ma juba r\u00e4\u00e4kinud. <\/p>\n<p>i7-8700 sooritus on hea Sysbench, 7zip ja ffmpeg testides. <br \/>\nK\u00f5igis testides on i7-7700k parem kui i7-7700 vahemikus 2% kuni 14%, ffmpeg testis 16%.<br \/>\nKordan, et ma ei teinud muid optimeerimisi, peale alguses mainitud, mis t\u00e4hendab, et kui installite puhta s\u00fcsteemi meie uusostetud dedikiga, saate t\u00e4pselt sellised tulemused. <\/p>\n<p><b>Tuumar, vood, sagedused \u2014 see on meie k\u00f5ik<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Kokkuv\u00f5ttes olid tulemused etteennustatavad ja oodatavad. Peaaegu k\u00f5igis testides ilmneb 'taevast \u00fcles ronimine', mis n\u00e4itab tulemuslikkuse s\u00f5ltuvust tuumade, l\u00f5ngade ja sageduste arvust: rohkem sellest k\u00f5igest \u2014 paremad tulemused. <\/p>\n<p>Kuna k\u00f5ik aluseks olevad protsessorid on tegelikult sama tuuma v\u00e4rskendused samal tehnoloogia protsessil ja neil ei ole mingeid fundamentaalseid arhitektuurilisi erinevusi, ei suutnud me saada '\u0161okeerivaid' t\u00f5endeid, et protsessorid erinevad \u00fcksteisest kvaliteedilt. <\/p>\n<p>Erinevus protsessorite i7-9700k ja i9-9900k vahel k\u00f5igis testides, v\u00e4lja arvatud Sysbench, l\u00e4heneb nullile, kuna nad erinevad p\u00f5him\u00f5tteliselt vaid Hyper-Threading tehnoloogia olemasolu ja i9-9900k Turbo Boost re\u017eiimis lisasaja megahertsiga. Sysbench'i testis on aga vastupidi: otsustab mitte tuumade arv, vaid l\u00f5ngade arv.<br \/>\n\u00c4\u00e4rmiselt suur vahe mitme l\u00f5nga testides i7-7700(k) ja i9-9900k vahel, kohati lausa kaks korda. Samuti on erinevus i7-7700 ja i7-7700k vahel \u2014 lisandunud 300 MHz toob viimasesse rohkem s\u00e4hvakat.<\/p>\n<p>Samuti ei saa ma r\u00e4\u00e4kida olulistest m\u00f5judest, mida sordi vahem\u00e4lu vol\u00fc\u00fcm testitulemustele avaldab \u2014 meil on, mis on. Veelgi enam, aktiveeritud Spectre\/Meltdown kaitse peaks tuntavalt v\u00e4hendama selle mahu m\u00f5ju testitulemustele, kuid see ei ole kindel. Kui austatud lugeja n\u00f5uab 'leiba ja meelelahutust' meie turundusosakonnast, viin ma teie jaoks r\u00f5\u00f5muga l\u00e4bi testimise ilma kaitse aktiveerimata.<\/p>\n<p>\u00dcldiselt, kui mind k\u00fcsitaks: millise protsessori valiksid sina ise? \u2014 alustaksin ma rahakoti sisu hindamisest ja valiksin selle, mille jaoks raha jagub. Kui l\u00fchidalt \u00f6elda, siis A-st B-sse v\u00f5ib s\u00f5ita ka '\u017diguliga', kuid 'Mercedesega' on seda siiski kiirem ja meeldivam. Protsessorid, millel on \u00fcks ja sama arhitektuur, hakkavad teistega sarnaste \u00fclesannetega \u00fchel v\u00f5i teisel viisil toime tulema \u2014 keegi lihtsalt h\u00e4sti, keegi suurep\u00e4raselt. Jah, nagu testimine n\u00e4itas, ei ole nende vahel suuri erinevusi. Kuid i7 ja i9 vahe ei ole seet\u00f5ttu kuhugi kadunud. <\/p>\n<p>M\u00f5nede spetsiifiliste \u00fclesannete, nagu mp3-de t\u00f6\u00f6tlemine, l\u00e4htekoodist kompileerimine v\u00f5i kolmem\u00f5\u00f5tmeliste stseenide renderdamine valguse t\u00f6\u00f6tlemisega, puhul on m\u00f5istlik l\u00e4htuda vastavatest testitulemustest. N\u00e4iteks v\u00f5ivad disainerid kohe keskenduda i7-9700k ja i9-9900k protsessoritele, samas kui keerukate arvutuste jaoks tasub valida Hyper-Threading tehnoloogiaga protsessor, st m\u00f5ni muu kui i7-9700k. Siin juhivad vood. <\/p>\n<p>Seet\u00f5ttu soovitan valida midagi, mida saate oma spetsifikatsiooni arvesse v\u00f5ttes endale lubada, ja see toob teile \u00f5nne. <\/p>\n<p>Testimisel kasutati servereid i7-7700, i7-7700k, i7-8700k, i7-9700k ja i9-9900k protsessoritega,\u00a0<noindex><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/1dedic.ru\/ready_servers\/?utm_source=habr&amp;utm_medium=article&amp;utm_campaign=product&amp;utm_content=i9&amp;utm_term=1dedic_ready\">1dedic.ru<\/a><\/noindex>. Iga\u00fcht neist saab tellida 5% soodustusega 3 kuuks \u2013 p\u00f6\u00f6rduge <noindex><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/1dedic.ru\/contacts?utm_source=habr&amp;utm_medium=article&amp;utm_campaign=product&amp;utm_content=i9&amp;utm_term=salesdep\">m\u00fc\u00fcgiosakonna<\/a><\/noindex>\u00a0juurde koodifraasiga \u201eMa olen Habrast\u201c. Aasta makse korral veel 10% soodsam.<\/p>\n<p><b>Kogu \u00f5htu areenil <noindex><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/habr.com\/ru\/users\/trashwind\/\" class=\"user_link\">Trashwind<\/a><\/noindex>, s\u00fcsteemihaldur FirstDEDIC<\/b><br \/>\n<br \/>Allikas: <a content=\"nofollow\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/habr.com\/ru\/company\/first\/blog\/443650\/\">habr.com<\/a> <\/p>","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0421 \u043f\u043e\u044f\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0446\u0435\u0441\u0441\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432 Intel Core \u0441\u0435\u0434\u044c\u043c\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u043e\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u0438\u043c \u0441\u0442\u0430\u043b\u043e \u043f\u043e\u043d\u044f\u0442\u043d\u043e, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0435\u0433\u0438\u044f \u00ab\u0422\u0438\u043a-\u0442\u0430\u043a\u00bb, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0439 \u0418\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b \u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043b \u0432\u0441\u0451 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f, \u0434\u0430\u043b\u0430 \u0441\u0431\u043e\u0439. \u041e\u0431\u0435\u0449\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u044c\u0448\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0442\u0435\u0445\u043d\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0446\u0435\u0441\u0441 \u0441 14 \u0434\u043e 10 \u043d\u043c \u0442\u0430\u043a \u0438 \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0441\u044c \u043e\u0431\u0435\u0449\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c, \u043d\u0430\u0447\u0430\u043b\u0430\u0441\u044c \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0433\u0430\u044f \u044d\u043f\u043e\u0445\u0430 \u00ab\u0422\u0430\u043a\u0430\u00bb Skylake, \u0432\u043e \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u043b\u0441\u044f Kaby Lake (\u0441\u0435\u0434\u044c\u043c\u043e\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435), \u0432\u043d\u0435\u0437\u0430\u043f\u043d\u044b\u0439 Coffee Lake (\u0432\u043e\u0441\u044c\u043c\u043e\u0435) \u0441 \u043d\u0435\u0437\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u043c \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u0442\u0435\u0445\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0446\u0435\u0441\u0441\u0430 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":1,"featured_media":92117,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[688],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-92116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-administrirovanie"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.1.1 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Yuri Gagarin\"\/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/blog\/administrirovanie\/tak-tak-tak-i-nikakogo-tika-chem-otlichayutsya-proczessory-intel-core-raznyh-pokolenij-na-osnove-odnoj-arhitektury\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.1.1\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"et_EE\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"ProHoster | \u041a\u0443\u043f\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0436\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0445\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043d\u0433 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0441\u0430\u0439\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u0441 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u043e\u0442 DDoS, VPS VDS \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044b\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\ud83e\udd47\u0422\u0430\u043a-\u0422\u0430\u043a-\u0422\u0430\u043a \u0438 \u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0422\u0438\u043a\u0430. \u0427\u0435\u043c \u043e\u0442\u043b\u0438\u0447\u0430\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0446\u0435\u0441\u0441\u043e\u0440\u044b Intel Core \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043f\u043e\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043d\u0430 \u043e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0435 \u043e\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0430\u0440\u0445\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0440\u044b | ProHoster\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/blog\/administrirovanie\/tak-tak-tak-i-nikakogo-tika-chem-otlichayutsya-proczessory-intel-core-raznyh-pokolenij-na-osnove-odnoj-arhitektury\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/logo-350.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:secure_url\" content=\"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/logo-350.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"350\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"350\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-08-23T17:42:14+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-23T17:42:14+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/prohoster\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/prohoster\" \/>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"\ud83e\udd47Nii-Nii-Nii ja mitte mingit Tiki. Kuidas erinevad Intel Core erinevate p\u00f5lvkondade protsessorid sama arhitektuuri p\u00f5hjal | ProHoster","description":"","canonical_url":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/blog\/administrirovanie\/tak-tak-tak-i-nikakogo-tika-chem-otlichayutsya-proczessory-intel-core-raznyh-pokolenij-na-osnove-odnoj-arhitektury","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"et_EE","og:site_name":"ProHoster | \u041a\u0443\u043f\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0436\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0445\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043d\u0433 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0441\u0430\u0439\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u0441 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u043e\u0442 DDoS, VPS VDS \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044b","og:type":"article","og:title":"\ud83e\udd47\u0422\u0430\u043a-\u0422\u0430\u043a-\u0422\u0430\u043a \u0438 \u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0422\u0438\u043a\u0430. \u0427\u0435\u043c \u043e\u0442\u043b\u0438\u0447\u0430\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0446\u0435\u0441\u0441\u043e\u0440\u044b Intel Core \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043f\u043e\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043d\u0430 \u043e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0435 \u043e\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0430\u0440\u0445\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0440\u044b | ProHoster","og:url":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/blog\/administrirovanie\/tak-tak-tak-i-nikakogo-tika-chem-otlichayutsya-proczessory-intel-core-raznyh-pokolenij-na-osnove-odnoj-arhitektury","og:image":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/logo-350.jpg","og:image:secure_url":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/logo-350.jpg","og:image:width":350,"og:image:height":350,"article:published_time":"2020-08-23T17:42:14+00:00","article:modified_time":"2020-08-23T17:42:14+00:00","article:publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/prohoster","article:author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/prohoster"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"92116","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":null,"schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"reviewed_by":null,"ai":null,"created":"2021-02-28 12:14:23","updated":"2022-09-30 00:01:44","focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"link","format":"url"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92116"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92116\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/92117"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}