{"id":92131,"date":"2020-08-23T19:42:26","date_gmt":"2020-08-23T17:42:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/blog\/administrirovanie\/i9-10900k-protiv-i9-9900k-chto-mozhno-vyzhat-iz-novyh-intel-core-na-staroj-arhitekture"},"modified":"2020-08-23T19:42:26","modified_gmt":"2020-08-23T17:42:26","slug":"i9-10900k-protiv-i9-9900k-chto-mozhno-vyzhat-iz-novyh-intel-core-na-staroj-arhitekture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/et\/blog\/administrirovanie\/i9-10900k-protiv-i9-9900k-chto-mozhno-vyzhat-iz-novyh-intel-core-na-staroj-arhitekture","title":{"rendered":"i9-10900K versus i9-9900K: what can we squeeze from the new Intel Core on the old architecture","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"

\"i9-10900K
\n
\nJust over a year has passed since I tested the brand new Intel Core i9-9900K.<\/a><\/noindex>But time goes on, everything changes, and now Intel has released the fresh line of 10th generation Intel Core i9-10900K processors. What surprises these processors hold for us and is it true that everything changes \u2014 let's talk about it right now.
\n<\/a><\/noindex><\/p>\n

Comet Lake-S <\/h3>\n

\nThe codename for the 10th generation Intel Core processors is Comet Lake. And yes, it remains at 14 nm. Another refresh Skylake<\/a><\/noindex>, which Intel themselves call an 'evolution.' It's their right. Let them name it as they wish. Meanwhile, let's take a look at what has changed in the new generation compared to the previous, ninth one. And we'll find out how far the i9-10900K has moved from the i9-9900K. So, let's dive into the points. <\/p>\n

Socket change<\/b><\/p>\n

Socket LGA 1151<\/a><\/noindex> (Socket H4) was designed in 2015 and lasted a whole 5 years, seeing four generations of processors, which is generally unusual for Intel, who likes to change sockets every two years. However, it is worth noting that the company compensated for this point with incompatibility between new\/old processors and chipsets\u2026<\/p>\n

Yes, nothing is eternal under the moon, and Intel simultaneously with the release of the 10th generation rolled out a new socket \u2014 LGA 1200 (Socket H5). Although it is compatible in mounting hole dimensions (75 mm) with existing cooling systems, the faint hope that they wouldn't need to be replaced dissolved after the first preliminary tests. But more on that later. <\/p>\n

More cores, higher frequency<\/b><\/p>\n

As is traditional for Intel, the remedy for nanometer stagnation: if you don\u2019t change the manufacturing process, then add cores and increase frequencies. It worked this time too. The Intel i9-10900K has been outfitted with two more cores, resulting in 4 additional threads in<\/a><\/noindex>Hyper-threading
\n(HT). As a result, the total number of cores increased to 10, and the number of threads \u2014 to 20. Given that the manufacturing process has not changed, the thermal design power, or<\/a><\/noindex> TDP <\/p>\n

, has increased from 95W to 125W \u2014 that is, more than 30% higher. Let me remind you that these are the figures with all cores running at base frequency. Cooling this 'heat monster' with air alone is not easy. It is advisable to use a liquid cooling system (LCS). But there is a nuance here. If the base frequency of the new processor has increased by only 100 MHz \u2014 from 3.6 to 3.7, then with<\/a><\/noindex>Turbo Boost <\/p>\n

Kui uue protsessori baas sagedus t\u00f5usis vaid 100 MHz \u2014 3,6-lt 3,7-le, siis Turbo Boostiga<\/a><\/noindex> Asjad on muutunud huvitavamaks. Kui m\u00e4letate, siis i9-9900K suudab Turbo Boosti re\u017eiimis saavutada 5 GHz \u00fche tuuma kohta (harva kahel), 4,8 GHz kahel ja \u00fclej\u00e4\u00e4nud t\u00f6\u00f6tavad sagedusel 4,7 GHz. i9-10900K puhul t\u00f6\u00f6tab n\u00fc\u00fcd \u00fcks tuum kiirusel 5,1-5,2 GHz, samas kui k\u00f5ik \u00fclej\u00e4\u00e4nud t\u00f6\u00f6tavad 4,7 GHz peal. Kuid Intel ei peatunud sellega. <\/p>\n

Peale juba tuttava Turbo Boost tehnoloogia on lisandunud mega-super-turbo-boost. Selle ametlik nimi on Thermal Velocity Boost (TVB)<\/b>. Tuleb m\u00e4rkida, et seda tehnoloogiat rakendati juba Intel Core'i kaheksandas p\u00f5lvkonnas, kuid seda said vaid valitud mudelid. N\u00e4iteks on mulle tuntud i9-9980HK ja i9-9880H. <\/p>\n

Tehnoloogia olemus seisneb selles, et teatud protsessori temperatuuril t\u00f5useb \u00fche v\u00f5i mitme tuuma sagedus k\u00f5rgemale Turbo Boost\u2019ist. Lisanduv sagedus s\u00f5ltub sellest, kui palju protsessori t\u00f6\u00f6temperatuur j\u00e4\u00e4b maksimaalsest alla. Intel Thermal Velocity Boost tehnoloogia aktiveerimise korral saavutatakse protsessori tuumade maksimaalne sagedus t\u00f6\u00f6temperatuuril mitte \u00fcle 50\u00b0C. Tulemusena t\u00f5useb TVB re\u017eiimis \u00fche tuuma kellafrekvents t\u00f5us kuni 5,3 GHz ning \u00fclej\u00e4\u00e4nud tuumade kellafrekvents kuni 4,9 GHz. <\/p>\n

Kuna uue p\u00f5lvkonna tuumi on n\u00fc\u00fcd kaks rohkem, siis maksimaalses automaatse \u00fclevoolu re\u017eiimis k\u00f5ikide boost-t\u00fc\u00fcpide abil eraldab see \u201eahi\u201c kuni 250 W, mis on isegi veep\u00f5hise jahutuss\u00fcsteemi (CWS) jaoks v\u00e4ljakutse, eriti kompaktses korpuses, ilma veebloki v\u00e4ljastamiseta... <\/p>\n

R\u00e4\u00e4giti tuumadest, selgitati sagedusi, kaevati pistikutest, liikume edasi. Peamiste muudatuste hulka kuulub veidi suurenenud L3 vahem\u00e4lu ja t\u00f5stetud toetatud RAM-i sagedus \u2014 DDR-2666-lt DDR4-2933-le. Sisuliselt on see k\u00f5ik. Intel ei uuendanud isegi integreeritud graafikatuuma. RAM-i maht ei ole samuti muutunud, sama 128 GB on p\u00e4randatud eelmise p\u00f5lvkonna mudelitelt. See t\u00e4hendab, et nagu alati uuenduste puhul, lisati tuumi ja sagedusi, t\u00f5si, vahetati ka pistik. Pole mingeid olulisi muudatusi, v\u00e4hemalt serverite kontekstis, ei ole. Pakun, et liikumine testimise poolele ja vaatame, kuidas uue p\u00f5lvkonna j\u00f5udlus v\u00f5rreldes eelneva p\u00f5lvkonnaga on muutunud. <\/p>\n

Testimine <\/h3>\n

\nTestimises osaleb kaks Intel Core protsessorit: <\/p>\n