REG.RU vs Beget: taƙaitawa

An fara ɗan ƙasa da shekara guda da ta wuce labari mai ban sha'awa, lokacin da REG.RU ba tare da izini ba ya ƙare yarjejeniyar haɗin gwiwa tare da Beget. Na yi sha'awar yadda al'amura ke tafiya da wannan batu, kuma na yanke shawarar yin tambaya game da ci gaban shari'ar daga mahalarta kai tsaye, tun da maganganun kowane bangare ba su da tushe. Na yi tambayoyi ga bangarorin biyu. REG.RU sun iyakance kansu ga amsar da ke ɗauke da jimlar jimloli, amma Beget ya wakilta redphoenix sun amince su bayyana matsayinsu kuma su ba da duk takardu.

REG.RU vs Beget: taƙaitawa

- Don Allah a gaya mana me ya jawo rikicin?

A Yuni 06, 2018, yawancin masu yanki sun fara karɓar imel daga mai rejista REG.RU. Sun bayyana cewa kamfanin Beget, wanda a baya ya kasance abokin tarayya na REG.RU, zai daina yin la'akari da haka, kuma REG.RU za ta yi amfani da sunayen yanki kai tsaye.

Shekara guda da ta gabata, mun zama mai rijistar sunan yankin mai zaman kansa, wanda, mun yi imani, shine yunƙurin kawo ƙarshen kwangilar tare da mu da kuma zarge-zarge iri-iri.

- Wadanne hukumomi ne kuke hulɗa da su kuma akan wadanne batutuwa?

8 Yuni 2018 REG.RU ya shigar da kara a kan mu ga Cibiyar Haɗin gwiwar ANO don Domain Intanet na Ƙasa. A ciki, wakilan REG.RU sun bukaci:

  • gudanar da binciken da ba a shirya ba na mai rejista mai suna Beget LLC don biyan bukatun mai gudanarwa;
  • dakatar da amincewar mai rejista Beget LLC.

Cibiyar Haɗin kai ta ƙaddamar da binciken da ba a shirya ba na duka masu rajista. A sakamakon haka, Beget ba a samu cin zarafi ba, da REG.RU an gano cin zarafi.

Korafe-korafe da mafita

13 Yuni 2018 REG.RU ya shigar da kara ga Hukumar Kula da Antimonopoly ta Tarayya (FAS):

An yarda da korafin don yin la'akari, kuma an gudanar da tarurruka uku. Dole ne mu shirya adadi mai yawa na ƙididdiga, amma an ɗauki fiye da mako guda don tattara ma'aunin. Ana samun maganin FAS a mahada, masu rajista sun shiga a matsayin masu sha'awar RU-CENTER и R01.

FAS yanke shawara - Kashe la'akari da shari'ar No. 1-14.6-429 / 78-01-18, tun da babu wani cin zarafi na antimonopoly doka a cikin ayyukan Beget LLC (OGRN 1077847645590, INN 7801451618) da hukumar ta yi la'akari.

Korafe-korafe da mafita

Koka ga Roskomnadzor -Ba a gano cin zarafi daga bangarenmu ba, babu bincike - kawai an nemi mu yi sharhi.

- Shin kun ɗauki wani mataki don mayar da martani?

Ee, mun shigar da kara don dakatar da kwangilar ba bisa ka'ida ba.

Wani al’amari mai ban sha’awa ya taso: Kotun matakin farko ta ki amincewa da da’awarmu, tun da ba mu yi bukatar kudi ba, kuma maganar ta kasance kamar haka:

Bayan da kotun ta yi nazari kan wadannan hukunce-hukunce, ta yanke hukuncin cewa mai shigar da karar ya zabi hanyar da ba ta dace ba ta kare hakkin da aka keta, tun da ba a yi shi ne don maido da huldar kwangila ba. A wannan yanayin, za a iya yin la'akari da hujjar mai gabatar da kara game da rashin dalilan shari'a don kin amincewa da kwangilar daya daga cikin bangarorin yayin la'akari da da'awar daya daga cikin bangarorin don biyan diyya ga asarar da ke hade da irin wannan ƙarewa. Ko kuma a cikin da'awar da ke da nufin kare martabar kasuwanci, kamar yadda mai ƙara kuma ya nuna.

Hukuncin daukaka kara de jure ya gane cewa ba mu da wani laifi:

A lokaci guda, a zaman kotun na kotun daukaka kara, mai zartarwa (Domain Name Registrar REG.RU LLC) ba zai iya bayyana ainihin abin da abokin ciniki ya keta yarjejeniyar (Beget LLC) ba kuma ya ba da duk wata shaida da ke nuna irin wannan. take hakki .
Dan kwangila (Domain Name Registrar REG.RU LLC) ya aiwatar da tanadin da aka bayar a cikin sashe na 2 na Art. 782 na Civil Code na Rasha Federation da hakkin ya ƙi aiwatar da kwangila ga biya ayyuka bayar cikakken maidawa abokin ciniki (LLC "Beget") asarar.

Wannan hukunci na kotu ya dace da mu, tun da kotu ta gane cewa ba mu da keta kwangilar.

Bayanin da'awar da matani na yanke shawara

- Shin ana ci gaba da bincike ko za a iya la'akarin warware matsalar?

Yanzu mun ƙaddamar da aikace-aikacen ga FAS, saboda mun yi imani cewa REG.RU:

  1. Ya keta dokar talla ta ƙaddamarwa talla akan VK tare da bayanin cewa muna karya doka. Ko da yake wannan ba gaskiya ba ne, kuma hukumomi masu izini ne kawai za su iya kafa wannan;
  2. Gabatar da masu amfani da mu a ciki rudu kuma ya aika musu da buƙatun cire wannan kayan daga Intanet;
  3. Ta ƙara wani keɓaɓɓen magana ga yarjejeniyar haɗin gwiwa, yana cin zarafin babban matsayinsa a kasuwa. A wasu kalmomi, yana iya rinjayar farashin sabis ta amfani da hanyoyin da ba na kasuwa ba. Matsayi mai rikitarwa;
  4. Yana tauye hakkinsa ta hanyar fara bincike kan mu da yawa, wadanda a ma’anarsu ba wai don ganowa da kawar da cin zarafi ba.

Ana iya samun rubutun bayanin mu ga FAS a nan. A halin yanzu FAS yana la'akari bayanin mu.

Daga marubucin, a takaice

Don taƙaita takaddun da aka bayar:

  1. Koka ga CC - ba a sami cin zarafi ba a Beget, amma a REG.RU an same su;
  2. Koka ga Roskomnadzor - ba a sami cin zarafi ba a Beget, babu dubawa;
  3. Koka ga FAS - ba a sami cin zarafi ba a Beget; REG.RU a halin yanzu ana la'akari;
  4. An yi watsi da bukatar da aka yi wa kotun, kodayake Beget ya gamsu da kalmomin da ke cikin tasiri.

Ina son jin tsokaci daga wakilan REG.RU akan wannan batu.

source: www.habr.com

Add a comment