Kotun kolin Amurka ta fitar da wani hukunci dangane da la'akari da shari'ar Oracle v. Google, wanda ake ta tafkawa tun a shekarar 2010, dangane da amfani da Java API a dandalin Android. Kotun koli ta goyi bayan Google kuma ta gano cewa amfani da API ɗin Java yayi daidai da amfani.
Kotun ta amince da cewa, manufar Google ita ce samar da wani tsari na daban da ya mayar da hankali kan magance matsalolin da ke tattare da muhallin kwamfuta na daban (wayoyin wayoyi), kuma ci gaban da aka samu na manhajar Android ya taimaka wajen cimma wannan buri da kuma yada shi. Tarihi ya nuna cewa akwai hanyoyi daban-daban da sake aiwatar da tsarin sadarwa zai iya ba da gudummawa ga ci gaban shirye-shiryen kwamfuta. Manufar Google ita ce cimma irin wannan ci gaba na ƙirƙira, wanda shine babbar manufar dokar haƙƙin mallaka.
Google ya aro kusan layukan API 11500, wanda shine kawai 0.4% na aiwatar da API na layukan miliyan 2.86. Idan aka yi la’akari da girma da muhimmancin lambar da aka yi amfani da ita, kotu ta ɗauki layukan 11500 a matsayin ƙaramin sashi na gabaɗaya mai girma. A matsayin wani ɓangare na mu'amalar shirye-shirye, igiyoyin da aka kwafi suna da alaƙa da wasu lambobi (marasa Oracle) waɗanda masu shirye-shirye ke amfani da su. Google ya kwafi guntun lambar da ake tambaya ba saboda kamala ko fa'idar aikin sa ba, amma saboda ya baiwa masu shirye-shirye damar amfani da dabarun da ake da su a cikin sabon yanayin kwamfuta na wayoyi.
Bari mu tuna cewa a cikin 2012, wani alkali tare da ƙwarewar shirye-shirye ya yarda da matsayin Google kuma ya gane cewa bishiyar sunan da ke samar da API wani ɓangare ne na tsarin umarni - jerin haruffan da ke da alaƙa da takamaiman aiki. Irin wannan saitin umarni ana fassara shi ta hanyar haƙƙin mallaka kamar yadda ba a ƙarƙashin haƙƙin mallaka ba, tunda kwafin tsarin umarni shine buƙatu don tabbatar da dacewa da aiki. Sabili da haka, ainihin layin tare da sanarwa da bayanin kai na hanyoyin ba shi da mahimmanci - don aiwatar da ayyuka iri ɗaya, sunayen aikin da ke kafa API dole ne su dace, koda kuwa an aiwatar da aikin da kansa daban. Tun da akwai hanya ɗaya kawai ta bayyana ra’ayi ko aiki, kowa yana da ’yancin yin amfani da furci iri ɗaya, kuma babu wanda zai iya sarrafa irin waɗannan kalaman.
Oracle ya shigar da kara kuma ya samu Kotun daukaka kara ta Amurka ta soke hukuncin - kotun daukaka kara ta gane cewa Java API mallakin hankali ne na Oracle. Bayan haka, Google ya canza dabaru kuma ya yi ƙoƙarin tabbatar da cewa aiwatar da Java API a cikin dandali na Android ya yi amfani da adalci, kuma wannan ƙoƙarin ya sami nasara. Matsayin Google shine ƙirƙirar software mai ɗaukuwa baya buƙatar lasisin API, kuma ana ɗaukar kwafin API don ƙirƙirar daidaitattun ayyuka masu dacewa da "amfani mai kyau." A cewar Google, rarraba APIs a matsayin mallakar fasaha zai yi mummunan tasiri a kan masana'antar, saboda yana lalata ci gaban kirkire-kirkire, kuma ƙirƙirar kwatankwacin aiki na dandamali na software na iya zama batun shari'a.
Oracle ya sake daukaka kara a karo na biyu, kuma an sake duba karar a madadinta. Kotun ta yanke hukuncin cewa ka'idar "amfani da gaskiya" ba ta shafi Android ba, tun da Google ke haɓaka wannan dandamali don dalilai na son kai, ba ta hanyar siyar da samfuran software kai tsaye ba, amma ta hanyar sarrafa ayyukan da ke da alaƙa da talla. A lokaci guda, Google yana riƙe da iko akan masu amfani ta hanyar API na mallakar mallaka don hulɗa tare da ayyukansa, wanda aka hana amfani da shi don ƙirƙirar analogues masu aiki, watau. Amfani da API ɗin Java baya iyakance ga amfanin da ba na kasuwanci ba. Dangane da mayar da martani, Google ya shigar da kara zuwa kotun koli, kuma Kotun Koli ta Amurka ta dawo don duba batun ko aikace-aikacen shirye-shiryen shirye-shiryen (API) na mallakar fasaha ne kuma ta yanke shawara ta ƙarshe don goyon bayan Google.
source: budenet.ru