Wani sabon juyi a cikin shari'ar da ke da alaƙa da keta haddin lasisin GPL Vizio

Kungiyar kare hakkin dan Adam ta Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) ta sanar da wani sabon zagaye na shari'a tare da Vizio, wanda ake zargi da rashin bin ka'idodin lasisin GPL lokacin rarraba firmware don TV mai wayo bisa tsarin SmartCast. Wakilan SFC sun yi nasarar mayar da shari'ar daga Kotun Tarayya ta Amurka zuwa Kotun Gundumar California, wanda ke da mahimmanci daga ra'ayi na rarraba GPL ba kawai a matsayin abubuwa na haƙƙin mallaka ba, har ma a cikin yankin. dangantakar kwangila.

A baya Vizio ya tura karar zuwa Kotun Tarayya, wacce ke da ikon warware batutuwan da suka shafi keta haƙƙin mallaka. Shari'ar da ake magana a kai sananne ne saboda a karo na farko a cikin tarihi ba a gabatar da shi ba a madadin ɗan takarar ci gaba wanda ke da haƙƙin haƙƙin mallaka ga lambar, amma a ɓangaren mabukaci wanda ba a ba da lambar tushe na abubuwan haɗin ba. rarraba ƙarƙashin lasisin GPL. Ta hanyar matsawa GPL mayar da hankali ga dokar haƙƙin mallaka, Vizio yana gina kariyarsa a ƙoƙarin tabbatar da cewa masu amfani ba su da cin gajiyar kuma ba su da hakkin kawo irin wannan da'awar. Wadancan. Vizio na neman korar karar ne bisa dalilin zubar da ciki, ba tare da jayayya da zarge-zargen cin zarafin GPL ba.

Wakilan kungiyar SFC sun fara daga gaskiyar cewa GPL yana da abubuwa na kwangila da mabukaci, wanda lasisin ya ba da wasu haƙƙoƙin, shi ne ɗan takara kuma yana iya buƙatar aiwatar da haƙƙinsa don samun lambar samfurin samfurin. Yarjejeniyar Kotun Tarayya ta mayar da karar zuwa Kotun Lardi ta tabbatar da cewa dokar kwangila za ta iya aiki ga cin zarafin GPL (ana gudanar da shari'ar keta hakkin mallaka a Kotunan Tarayya, yayin da ake gudanar da shari'ar kwangila a Kotunan Lardi).

Alkalin kotun, Josephine Staton, ta ki yin watsi da karar ne bisa dalilin cewa mai shigar da kara bai kasance mai cin gajiyar kararrakin keta haƙƙin mallaka ba saboda aiwatar da ƙarin aikin kwangila a ƙarƙashin GPL ya bambanta da haƙƙin da dokokin haƙƙin mallaka suka bayar. Umurnin mayar da karar zuwa kotun gundumar ya lura cewa GPL yana aiki duka a matsayin lasisi don amfani da aikin haƙƙin mallaka da kuma matsayin yarjejeniyar kwangila.

An shigar da karar Vizio a cikin 2021 bayan shekaru uku na kokarin aiwatar da GPL cikin lumana. A cikin firmware na Vizio smart TVs, fakitin GPL kamar Linux kernel, U-Boot, Bash, gawk, GNU tar, glibc, FFmpeg, Bluez, BusyBox, Coreutils, glib, dnsmasq, DirectFB, libgcrypt da systemd an gano su, amma kamfanin bai ba da damar mai amfani don neman rubutun tushen abubuwan GPL firmware ba, kuma a cikin kayan bayanan ba a ambaci amfani da software a ƙarƙashin lasisin haƙƙin mallaka da haƙƙoƙin da waɗannan lasisin ke bayarwa ba. Shari'ar ba ta neman diyya ta kuɗi; SFC tana neman kotu kawai ta umurci Vizio ta bi sharuɗɗan GPL a cikin samfuran ta kuma don sanar da masu amfani da haƙƙoƙin da lasisin haƙƙin mallaka ya bayar.

Maƙerin da ke amfani da lambar lasisin kwafin-hagu a cikin samfuransa dole ne ya samar da lambar tushe, gami da lambar don ayyukan da aka samo asali da umarnin shigarwa, don adana 'yancin software. Idan ba tare da irin waɗannan ayyuka ba, mai amfani yana rasa iko akan software kuma ba zai iya gyara kurakurai da kansa ba, ƙara sabbin abubuwa ko cire ayyukan da ba dole ba. Kuna iya buƙatar yin canje-canje don kare sirrin ku, gyara matsalolin da kanku waɗanda masana'anta suka ƙi gyarawa, da kuma tsawaita tsawon rayuwar na'urar bayan an daina goyan bayan ta a hukumance ko kuma ta daina aiki don ƙarfafa siyan sabon ƙira.

source: budenet.ru

Add a comment