{"id":35228,"date":"2019-10-31T22:03:05","date_gmt":"2019-10-31T19:03:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/blog\/is-polzu-j\/"},"modified":"2019-10-31T22:03:05","modified_gmt":"2019-10-31T19:03:05","slug":"is-polzu-j","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/blog\/news\/is-polzu-j","title":{"rendered":"\u0418\u0441[\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443]\u0439","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"

\u0160is ir visnoder\u012bg\u0101kais raksts, ko j\u016bs esat las\u012bjis. Jo tas ir par labumu un t\u0101 ieg\u016b\u0161anu.<\/p>\n

Manu v\u0113lmi to uzrakst\u012bt iedvesmoja saruna ar god\u0101jamo moderatoru vien\u0101 no platform\u0101m, kur es public\u0113ju savus rakstus. Un pirms tam \u2013 gandr\u012bz katrs koment\u0101rs, ko j\u016bs atst\u0101jat pie maniem rakstiem. Starp citu \u2013 gandr\u012bz viss, ko es redzu darb\u0101 katru dienu. Un pirms \u0161\u012b darba \u2013 iepriek\u0161\u0113jais, un v\u0113l pirms t\u0101 \u2013 v\u0113l viens, un t\u0101 l\u012bdz br\u012bdim, kad es sapratu, ka ir labums un k\u0101 to ieg\u016bt.<\/p>\n

Pirmais un galvenais<\/h4>\n

<\/a><\/noindex>
\nVisgalven\u0101kais, kas j\u0101zina par labumu \u2013 tas ir subjekt\u012bvs vai relat\u012bvs.<\/p>\n

L\u016bk, j\u016bs to tagad izlas\u012bj\u0101t un dom\u0101jat \u2013 j\u0101, es to jau zinu. M\u0113\u0123iniet atcer\u0113ties par to, kad n\u0101kamreiz rakst\u012bsiet koment\u0101ru, piem\u0113ram, \"\u0161eit nav nek\u0101 noder\u012bga\", vai diskut\u0113jot ar k\u0101du par k\u0101da labumu, vai pat dom\u0101jot par labumu vienatn\u0113. Es j\u016bs p\u0101rliecinu, atcer\u0113ties par labuma subjektivit\u0101ti ir \u0101rk\u0101rt\u012bgi gr\u016bti. Vienm\u0113r ir daudz viegl\u0101k uztvert labumu k\u0101 objekta, par kuru izp\u0113ti notiek runa \u2013 raksta, gr\u0101matas, filma, instrumenta utt. objekt\u012bv\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161\u012bba.<\/p>\n

Es \u0161obr\u012bd neizvirzu sevi pret jums \u2013 man ar\u012b ir gr\u016bti nepiecie\u0161amaj\u0101 br\u012bd\u012b atcer\u0113ties par subjektivit\u0101ti, relat\u012bvit\u0101ti labuma. M\u0113s esam vien\u0101 laiv\u0101, un m\u016bs taj\u0101 ir apm\u0113ram 7 miljardi.<\/p>\n

Ko noz\u012bm\u0113 \u201csubjektivit\u0101te\u201d? Viss ir vienk\u0101r\u0161i. Ir objekts \u2013 raksts, gr\u0101mata, filma, instruments, metodika utt. Ir subjekts \u2013 j\u016bs, vai es, vai Gena, vai br\u012bni\u0161\u0137\u012bgais moderators vien\u0101 platform\u0101. Un \u0161eit objekts satiek subjektu \u2013 Gena izlas\u012bja rakstu. Un izdar\u012bja secin\u0101jumu.<\/p>\n

Tradicion\u0101lais secin\u0101jums vid\u0113jam Genam \u2013 objekt\u0101 nav nek\u0101da labuma. Izlaid\u012bsim gad\u012bjumus, kad Gena mums nav adekv\u0101ts \u2013 pie\u0146emsim, ka vi\u0146\u0161 ir diezgan piekl\u0101j\u012bgs cilv\u0113ks, kvalitat\u012bvs subjekts. Ko tr\u016bkst fr\u0101z\u0113 \"objekt\u0101 nav nek\u0101da labuma\"?<\/p>\n

Pamatojoties uz labuma subjektivit\u0101ti, tr\u016bkst divu v\u0101rdu \u2013 \"man\u0101 skat\u012bjum\u0101\". Objekt\u0101 nav nek\u0101da labuma man. Skan jau ne tik fat\u0101li, vai ne? Galu gal\u0101, iz\u0146emot Genu, rakstu lasa V\u0101sa, Ser\u017es un Vika. Pie\u0146emsim, ka Vika saka cit\u0101di \u2013 \"objekt\u0101 ir labums man\".<\/p>\n

Ja, ja, ja, sv\u0113t\u012bti, ka sliktie, kas v\u0113l nesen biju\u0161i koment\u0101ros, var k\u013c\u016bt neapmierin\u0101ti, un, izsakot savu viedokli, nor\u0101d\u012bt, ka ir vai nu labums, vai nav, \u201eman\u201d person\u012bgi, tad, \u0161\u0137iet, viss b\u016bs skaidrs. Rezult\u0101t\u0101 viedok\u013ca spriedums \u2013 vai ir labums, vai n\u0113 \u2013 vienk\u0101r\u0161i nepar\u0101d\u012bsies, jo tam neb\u016bs nek\u0101das j\u0113gas.<\/p>\n

Protams, k\u0101ds tom\u0113r uzrakst\u012bs, ka nav labuma, ta\u010du visi apk\u0101rt\u0113jie to uzreiz saprat\u012bs \u2013 cilv\u0113ks vienk\u0101r\u0161i cen\u0161as piev\u0113rst sev uzman\u012bbu. Jo tagad runa vairs nav par to, lai saboj\u0101tu autora garast\u0101vokli, k\u0101 parasti. Ja izt\u0113lojamies paties\u012bbu, cilv\u0113ks apvaino visus kl\u0101teso\u0161os. Vienk\u0101r\u0161ojot, vi\u0146\u0161 vienk\u0101r\u0161i saka: \u201ej\u016bs visi neesat pareizi.\u201d<\/p>\n

T\u0101 k\u0101 pretruna ir ac\u012bmredzama. Viens saka \u2013 \u201ees \u0161eit atradu labumu sev\u201d. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka labums ir. Otrs saka \u2013 \u201e\u0161eit nav nek\u0101da labuma\u201d. T\u0101tad pirmais, kas atrada labumu, nav taisn\u012bba.<\/p>\n

Bet ko dar\u012bt autoram? \u0160is puisis visp\u0101r ir mal\u0101. Ja skat\u0101mies uz labumu k\u0101 subjekt\u012bvu fenomenu, tad autors \u0161aj\u0101 vien\u0101dojum\u0101 visp\u0101r nepiedal\u0101s. J\u0101, vi\u0146\u0161 rad\u012bja objektu. Bet, kad par\u0101d\u012bj\u0101s subjekts, autora blakus vairs nav.<\/p>\n

Protams, vi\u0146\u0161 var censties pan\u0101kt rietojo\u0161o sauli, uzs\u0101kot papildu skaidrojumus koment\u0101ros, bet, manupr\u0101t, t\u0101da nost\u0101ja ir k\u013c\u016bdaina \u2013 autors nekad nen\u0101c\u012bs klaj\u0101 ar labiem tekstiem, ja vi\u0146a apzi\u0146\u0101 b\u016bs doma \u201eak, labi, v\u0113l\u0101k izskaidro\u0161u koment\u0101ros, ja nu kas\u201d. Bet tas attiecas tikai uz rakstiem. Gr\u0101matas ir daudz maz\u0101k\u0101 m\u0113r\u0101, jo t\u0101s tiek redi\u0123\u0113tas. Ievie\u0161anas projektos, kas ar\u012b ir labuma ieg\u016b\u0161anas objekti, autors parasti pavada m\u0113ne\u0161us pie subjekta, pal\u012bdzot vi\u0146am izvilkt labumu.<\/p>\n

T\u0101tad, n\u0101kamaj\u0101 reiz\u0113, kad j\u016bs dom\u0101siet vai rakst\u012bsiet par k\u0101da labumu, m\u0113\u0123iniet pievienot divus burvju v\u0101rdus: objekt\u0101 nav nek\u0101 laba man.<\/p>\n

Bet ar\u012b tas nav viss paties\u012bba. Vai j\u016bs neuztrauc v\u0101rds \u201enav\u201d fr\u0101z\u0113 \u201eobjekt\u0101 nav nek\u0101 laba\u201d? Varb\u016bt Gena steidz\u0101s?<\/p>\n

Ieg\u016b\u0161ana<\/h4>\n

\nIr t\u0101da izplat\u012bta fr\u0101ze \u2013 ieg\u016bt labumu. Tik izplat\u012bta, ka taj\u0101 iek\u013cautais j\u0113dziens vairs netiek uztverts. Tagad apst\u0101jieties un padom\u0101jiet par \u0161o fr\u0101zi un to, kas aiz t\u0101s sl\u0113pjas.<\/p>\n

Piem\u0113ram, j\u016bs esat izlas\u012bjis k\u0101du rakstu. J\u016bs pa\u0161i zin\u0101t, ka las\u012bt var \u013coti at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bgi. Var pieskat\u012bt, pa diagon\u0101li, piev\u0113r\u0161ot uzman\u012bbu tikai uzsistaj\u0101m fr\u0101z\u0113m. Var las\u012bt, visu laiku dom\u0101jot par kaut ko savu, un nemaz nesaprast izlas\u012bt\u0101 j\u0113gu. Var las\u012bt, piev\u0113r\u0161ot uzman\u012bbu tikai autora gramatikai. Var las\u012bt tikai, lai atrastu, par ko rakst\u012bt koment\u0101r\u0101. Var las\u012bt uzman\u012bgi, analiz\u0113jot katru piem\u0113ru un secin\u0101jumu. Var izdruk\u0101t un las\u012bt ar z\u012bmuli, veicot piez\u012bmes mal\u0101s un izce\u013cot to, kas \u0161\u0137iet interesants. Var p\u0113c las\u012b\u0161anas pats uzrakst\u012bt anot\u0101ciju, izce\u013cot raksta galveno domu. Utt.<\/p>\n

K\u0101da ir at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bba? M\u0113r\u0137os un centienos. M\u0113r\u0137us \u0161obr\u012bd neapspried\u012bsim, tie nav saist\u012bti ar raksta t\u0113mu. Pie\u0146emsim, ka las\u012bt\u0101jam, m\u016bsu subjektiem, ir \u0161\u0101ds m\u0113r\u0137is \u2013 g\u016bt labumu.
\nTad paliek centieni. Centieni, lai ieg\u016btu labumu. T\u0101 ir, iesp\u0113jams, pati sare\u017e\u0123\u012bt\u0101k\u0101 un nepat\u012bkam\u0101k\u0101 da\u013ca laba ieg\u016b\u0161an\u0101 \u2013 j\u0101dara p\u016bles, lai to ieg\u016btu.<\/p>\n

Ir v\u0113l viens izplat\u012bts teiciens \u2013 \u201csako\u0161\u013c\u0101ts un mut\u0113 ielikts\u201d. Ja turpin\u0101m \u0161o analo\u0123iju, tad j\u016bs \u2013 tas ir j\u016bsu \u0137ermenis, bet objekts, no kura j\u0101ieg\u016bst labums \u2013 ir p\u0101rtika, ko j\u016bs sev ieliekat. J\u016bsu uzdevums ir ne tikai palaist objektu caur sevi, bet ieg\u016bt no t\u0101 maksim\u0101li \u2013 olbaltumvielas, taukus, og\u013chidr\u0101tus, vitam\u012bnus, mikroelementus utt.<\/p>\n

Da\u013ca no \u0161\u012b darba notiks pati no sevis \u2013 piem\u0113ram, pateicoties zarnu mikroflorai. Bet liel\u0101ko da\u013cu darba n\u0101ksies paveikt jums. S\u0101kum\u0101 j\u0101pavada darbs ar zobiem, m\u0113li un siekalu dziedzeriem. P\u0113c tam bar\u012bbas vads k\u0101du br\u012bdi paciet\u012bs. T\u0101l\u0101k ku\u0146\u0123is p\u0101ris stundas p\u0101rvietos \u0161o mais\u012bjumu no sienas pie sienas, vienlaikus veicot \u0137\u012bmisko p\u0101rtikas apstr\u0101di ar ku\u0146\u0123a sulu. P\u0113c tam aktiviz\u0113sies vair\u0101ki zarnu posmi, katrs no kuriem veiks savu funkciju, tostarp fizisko \u2013 virz\u012bt p\u0101rtiku t\u0101l\u0101k. Nu un visbeidzot notiks katarsis.<\/p>\n

Visas darb\u012bbas, ko organisms veic ar \u0113dienu \u2013 labuma ieg\u016b\u0161ana. J\u0101, da\u017ereiz ir t\u0101, ka vien\u012bgais labums no organisma darba ir \u0101tra t\u0101 izvad\u012b\u0161ana no \u0137erme\u0146a \u2013 nu, t\u0101da p\u0101rtika ir. Bet liel\u0101kaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 gad\u012bjumu labuma ieg\u016b\u0161anai b\u016bs j\u0101pacie\u0161\u0101s.<\/p>\n

Tagad iedom\u0101jieties, ka j\u016bs, k\u0101 cilv\u0113ka \u0137ermenis, esat p\u0101rtrauku\u0161i censties g\u016bt labumu. S\u0101kat ar to, ka p\u0101rst\u0101jat ko\u0161\u013c\u0101t un nor\u012bt \u2013 k\u0101 cilv\u0113ki, kas atrodas kom\u0101 vai apzin\u0101ti nol\u0113mu\u0161i nomirt bad\u0101. Kas notiks t\u0101l\u0101k?<\/p>\n

Tas ir atkar\u012bgs no j\u016bsu apk\u0101rt\u0113jiem. Ja apk\u0101rt ir cilv\u0113ki, kas v\u0113l\u0113sies jums pal\u012bdz\u0113t, vi\u0146i vai nu ievietos jums r\u012bkl\u0113 baro\u0161anas cauruli \u0161\u0137idru \u0113dienu, vai piespied\u012bs j\u016bs \u0113st. Citiem v\u0101rdiem sakot, vi\u0146i padar\u012bs objektu viegl\u0101k apstr\u0101d\u0101jamu. Turkl\u0101t vi\u0146i to dar\u012bs j\u016bsu viet\u0101, jo \u0161is objects vairs nav jums \"pa zobiem\". Tie\u0161i t\u0101pat man, piem\u0113ram, nav pa zobiem raksti \u0137\u012bnie\u0161u valod\u0101, k\u0101da laba tur var\u0113tu b\u016bt, \u2013 es vienk\u0101r\u0161i pat nevaru s\u0101kt labuma ieg\u016b\u0161anu.<\/p>\n

Ja, iz\u0146emot atteik\u0161anos no \u0113diena ko\u0161\u013c\u0101\u0161anas, j\u016bsu organisms izsl\u0113gs ar\u012b p\u0101r\u0113jos apstr\u0101des posmus, tad \u2013 viss. Gr\u0101mat\u0101s, protams, saka, ka zarn\u0101m tom\u0113r vajadz\u0113tu darboties, jo t\u0101m ir sava nervu sist\u0113ma, bet zarnas ir par maz.<\/p>\n

Lai g\u016btu labumu no \u0113diena, organisms iegulda milz\u012bgas p\u016bles. Bez t\u0101 tas nav iesp\u0113jams. M\u0113s esam vienk\u0101r\u0161i pieradu\u0161i pie t\u0101 un neuztveram \u0161\u012bs p\u016bles k\u0101 p\u016bles.<\/p>\n

Lai g\u016btu labumu no citiem objektiem, jums b\u016bs j\u0101pieliek p\u016bles. Nu, protams, jums ir izv\u0113le, at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bb\u0101 no j\u016bsu organisma, bet formula paliek t\u0101da pati: ja v\u0113laties labumu \u2013 pielieciet p\u016bles t\u0101 ieg\u016b\u0161anai.<\/p>\n

Atgriez\u012bsimies pie iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101 noda\u013cas nosl\u0113guma: \"objekt\u0101 nav nek\u0101 laba\". Tagad, saprotot, ka, lai g\u016btu labumu, nepiecie\u0161amas subjekta p\u016bles, m\u0113s varam modific\u0113t fr\u0101zi: \"es nevar\u0113ju ieg\u016bt nek\u0101du labumu no objekta\". Lai ar\u012b tas joproj\u0101m skan m\u012bksti. Liel\u0101koties tas skan t\u0101: \"es nepam\u0113\u0123in\u0101ju ieg\u016bt nek\u0101du labumu no objekta\". Un, protams, var piebilst \u2013 \", bet uzdro\u0161inos apgalvot, ka tur nav nek\u0101 laba.\"<\/p>\n

Piekr\u012btiet, \"es nevar\u0113ju ieg\u016bt labumu\" skan mazliet cit\u0101di nek\u0101 \"\u0161eit nav labuma\". Izskat\u0101s, ka tas vairs nav tik absol\u016bti, tendenciozi un pa\u0161p\u0101rliecin\u0101ti. Bet b\u016bt\u012bba nav taj\u0101.<\/p>\n

Galvenais ir tas, ka sarunas priek\u0161mets radik\u0101li main\u0101s, akt\u012bvais s\u0101kums, centrs labuma ieg\u016b\u0161anai un g\u016b\u0161anai. Tagad tas vairs nav objekts, bet subjekts. Cilv\u0113ks vairs nerun\u0101 par objektu, bet par sevi pa\u0161u un savu sp\u0113ju g\u016bt labumu.<\/p>\n

Apm\u0113ram t\u0101. Vect\u0113vs nopirka viedt\u0101lruni. Vect\u0113vs pacent\u0101s, paklik\u0161\u0137in\u0101ja, un t\u0101, un \u0161it\u0101 \u2013 nek\u0101.
\nPirmaj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 vi\u0146\u0161 saka: uh, \u013caunuma izgudrojums, nek\u0101da labuma no t\u0101! K\u0101das saj\u016btas rodas pret vect\u0113vu? Vai gribas vi\u0146am pal\u012bdz\u0113t? Ko dom\u0101jat par viedt\u0101lruni?<\/p>\n

Otraj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 vi\u0146\u0161 saka: ak, k\u0101da lieta, bet man nav pietiekami pr\u0101ta to izmantot, \u017e\u0113l l\u012bdz asar\u0101m. Tagad k\u0101das saj\u016btas? Vai gribas vi\u0146am pal\u012bdz\u0113t? Bet k\u0101da ir viedt\u0101lru\u0146a v\u0113rt\u0113jums?<\/p>\n

Es jau sen, visos gad\u012bjumos, cen\u0161os nekoment\u0113t l\u012bdz\u012bgus tekstus, piem\u0113ram, \"tas ir nev\u0113rt\u012bgs materi\u0101ls\". M\u0113r\u0137is ir, var teikt, merkantilais \u2013 varb\u016bt k\u0101ds dom\u0101 par labumu tie\u0161i t\u0101pat k\u0101 es. Tad vi\u0146\u0161 izlas\u012bs manu koment\u0101ru k\u0101 \"es esmu idiots, nesp\u0113j\u012bgs saprast materi\u0101lu un g\u016bt no t\u0101 labumu\". Daudzi jau t\u0101 mani uzskata par idiotu, nev\u0113los pasliktin\u0101t situ\u0101ciju.<\/p>\n

Bet, k\u0101 j\u016bs saprat\u0101t, tas v\u0113l nav viss.<\/p>\n

Labuma atra\u0161an\u0101s vieta<\/h4>\n

\nIepriek\u0161 es izmantoju, b\u016bt\u012bb\u0101, diezgan primit\u012bvas defin\u012bcijas labuma un t\u0101 atra\u0161an\u0101s vietas. Es teicu, ka labums past\u0101v objekt\u0101, bet subjekts to nevar ieg\u016bt.
\nBet viss ir nedaudz nopietn\u0101k. Atcer\u0113simies sist\u0113misko dom\u0101\u0161anu.<\/p>\n

Jebkura sist\u0113ma sast\u0101v no objektiem, to \u012bpa\u0161\u012bb\u0101m un sait\u0113m. M\u016bsu gad\u012bjum\u0101 sist\u0113ma ir vienk\u0101r\u0161a \u2013 objekts un subjekts ar sav\u0101m \u012bpa\u0161\u012bb\u0101m un saite starp tiem. Saite rodas, kad j\u016bs p\u0113tat objektu, un turpina dz\u012bvot k\u0101du laiku. Cik ilgi \u2013 atkar\u012bgs no jums (atmi\u0146a, interese par materi\u0101lu utt.), tehnikas, k\u0101 objekts tiek izvietots telp\u0101 (atg\u0101din\u0101jumi par jaunajiem koment\u0101riem utt.).<\/p>\n

T\u0101tad, kur tad ir labums? Ja ticam tam, kas rakst\u012bts \u0161aj\u0101 rakst\u0101, izn\u0101k vienk\u0101r\u0161s secin\u0101jums: labums \u2013 tas ir objekta \u012bpa\u0161\u012bba. Statisk\u0101 \u0161\u0101da \u012bpa\u0161\u012bba ar k\u0101du v\u0113rt\u012bbu. Bet, ja \u012bpa\u0161\u012bba ir statiska, tad t\u0101 nav atkar\u012bga no subjekta, t\u0101pat? Piem\u0113ram, \u0161im rakstam labums ir 100 vien\u012bb\u0101m, kas b\u016btu j\u0101noz\u012bm\u0113.<\/p>\n

Tad \u0146emam otro m\u016bsu t\u0113zi: labumu no objekta ir j\u0101ieg\u016bst, un sp\u0113ja to ieg\u016bt attiecas uz subjektu, nevis uz objektu. T\u0101tad, sp\u0113ja g\u016bt labumu \u2013 t\u0101 ir subjekta \u012bpa\u0161\u012bba. T\u0101 ta\u010du san\u0101k?<\/p>\n

Bet, \u0161\u0137iet, ka tas nav piln\u012bgs izskaidrojums. Augst\u0101k m\u0113s apspried\u0101m, k\u0101 var las\u012bt rakstu un cik at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bgu rezult\u0101tu var ieg\u016bt. T\u0101tad, viens un tas pats subjekts var, atkar\u012bb\u0101 no sava iek\u0161\u0113j\u0101 st\u0101vok\u013ca, ieg\u016bt at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bgu labuma daudzumu no objekta. T\u0101 ta\u010du?<\/p>\n

Ir ir divi varianti. Vai m\u0113s p\u0101rtraucam uzskat\u012bt subjekta statisku, pie\u0161\u0137irot tam, k\u0101 React, props un state, vai ar\u012b p\u0101rvietojam iepriek\u0161\u0113jo teikumu no subjekta uz saiti. \u013bausim saitei b\u016bt ar\u012b \u012bpa\u0161\u012bb\u0101m. Izskat\u0101s, ka tas ir sapr\u0101t\u012bg\u0101k.<\/p>\n

Saites ir veids, k\u0101 j\u016bs izp\u0113t\u0101t konkr\u0113tu objektu, \u0161\u012b veida \u012bpa\u0161\u012bbas, pielikt\u0101s p\u016bles utt. No saites kvalit\u0101tes atkar\u012bgs, cik daudz labuma j\u016bs g\u016bsiet no objekta.<\/p>\n

Tagad spert soli mal\u0101 un m\u0113\u0123in\u0101sim saprast to, kas neiek\u013caujas \u0161aj\u0101 model\u012b. Atcer\u0113simies filmu \"Pr\u0101ta sp\u0113les\", kas, \u0161\u0137iet, ir balst\u012bta uz re\u0101liem notikumiem. Kas neatceras, es past\u0101st\u012b\u0161u par vienu ainu.<\/p>\n

Filma galvenais varonis ir D\u017eons Ne\u0161s, topo\u0161ais zin\u0101tnieks, bet pagaid\u0101m \u2013 Prinstonas students. Vi\u0146\u0161 cen\u0161as izdom\u0101t k\u0101du l\u012bdzsvara teoriju, bet nekas nesan\u0101k. Vi\u0146\u0161 kop\u0101 ar draugiem dodas uz b\u0101ru, kur ierodas ar\u012b meitenes \u2013 skaista un da\u017eas simp\u0101tiskas. Draugi s\u0101k str\u012bd\u0113ties, kur\u0161 uz\u0146emsies r\u016bpes par skaisto, atceroties Adama Smita stundas par konkurenci k\u0101 tirdzniec\u012bbas dzin\u0113ju.<\/p>\n

D\u017eonam piezogas apgaism\u012bba. Ja visi skries pie skaist\u0101s, tad vi\u0146i trauc\u0113s viens otram, un nevienam vi\u0146a nepien\u0101ksies. Un simp\u0101tisk\u0101s meitenes aizvainosies un aizies. Pui\u0161i paliks bez meiten\u0113m. Bet, ja visi dosies pie simp\u0101tiskaj\u0101m, ignor\u0113jot skaisto, tad ieguv\u0113ji b\u016bs visi. Visiem pui\u0161iem ir meitenes, neviens nevienu neaizvainoja. Nu, iz\u0146emot skaisto, kas varb\u016bt aizvainosies.<\/p>\n

P\u0113c \u0161\u012b secin\u0101juma D\u017eons piecelsies, pateicas skaistajai un aizb\u0113g. Skaist\u0101, protams, neizprot, par ko vi\u0146a tiek pateic\u012bta. \u0160\u012b situ\u0101cija, ja tic\u0113t filmai, pal\u012bdz\u0113ja D\u017eonam izkust\u0113ties no miru\u0161\u0101 punkta un pabeigt teoriju, par kuru vi\u0146\u0161 v\u0113l\u0101k sa\u0146\u0113ma Nobela balvu.<\/p>\n

Nu, atgriez\u012bsimies pie m\u016bsu mode\u013ca. Subjekts ir skaidrs \u2013 tas ir D\u017eons. Objekts ir skaidrs \u2013 meitenes, puikas un kopum\u0101 \u2013 noteikta uzdevuma. Saiti ar\u012b ir skaidra \u2013 D\u017eons k\u013cuvis par liecinieku un mazliet dal\u012bbnieku \u0161aj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101. Un galvenais \u2013 skaidra ir labuma izpratne, ko D\u017eons sp\u0113ja ieg\u016bt.
\nUzman\u012bbu, jaut\u0101jums: no kurienes vi\u0146\u0161 ieguva labumu?<\/p>\n

Iepriek\u0161 m\u0113s apspried\u0101m, ka labums tiek g\u016bts no objekta. Bet ac\u012bmredzot \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 objekt\u0101 nebija labuma, ko D\u017eons ieguva. Atg\u0101din\u0101\u0161u \u2013 vi\u0146\u0161 izkust\u0113j\u0101s no miru\u0161\u0101 punkta teorij\u0101, par kuru neviens no b\u0101ra situ\u0101cijas dal\u012bbniekiem nezin\u0101ja.<\/p>\n

Ne v\u012bri, ne sievietes, ne b\u0101rmens, ne pudeles neko nezin\u0101ja par \u0161o teoriju un mir\u0161o punktu. \u0160\u012b inform\u0101cija nebija nevien\u0101 no objekta da\u013c\u0101m.<\/p>\n

Sliding question \u2013 vai \u0161\u012b labums bija subjekt\u0101? Ja tic da\u017e\u0101d\u0101m teorij\u0101m, tad smadzenes zina atbildes uz visiem jaut\u0101jumiem. Bet nav iesp\u0113jas p\u0101rbaud\u012bt \u0161o teoriju, t\u0101p\u0113c pied\u0101v\u0101ju uzskat\u012bt, ka inform\u0101cija smadzen\u0113s, iesp\u0113jams, bija, bet, ja t\u0101 nebija izvilkta l\u012bdz tik\u0161an\u0101s ar objektu, tad lab\u0101k uzskat\u012bt, ka t\u0101s tur nav.<\/p>\n

Jums, iesp\u0113jams, bie\u017ei ir n\u0101cies saskarties ar t\u0101d\u0101m situ\u0101cij\u0101m, un koment\u0101ros es bie\u017ei sastopu \u2013 it k\u0101 'ar\u012b man uzd\u012bgs pr\u0101t\u0101, tikai nevar\u0113ju formul\u0113t', vai 'tie\u0161i \u0161\u012b galven\u0101 doma tr\u016bka, lai virz\u012btos uz priek\u0161u, bet es ta\u010du to zin\u0101ju!'.<\/p>\n

T\u0101tad, D\u017eons guva labumu ne no objekta, ne no subjekta. Paliek saikne. Vai vi\u0146\u0161 var\u0113ja g\u016bt labumu no saiknes?<\/p>\n

B\u0101r\u0101 vi\u0146\u0161 nebija pirmo reizi, un meitenes tur regul\u0101ri n\u0101k, k\u0101d\u0101 reiz\u0113 D\u017eons pat m\u0113\u0123in\u0101ja ar vi\u0146\u0101m run\u0101t, bet nekas nesan\u0101ca. \u0160\u0101da saikne, proti, l\u012bdz\u012bga situ\u0101cija, rad\u0101s ar\u012b iepriek\u0161. Iesp\u0113jams, ka probl\u0113ma nav saikn\u0113.<\/p>\n

Tad kur\u0101 viet\u0101? Atgriez\u012bsimies pie sist\u0113misk\u0101 dom\u0101\u0161anas, kas saka \u2013 hei, pui\u0161i, nem\u0113\u0123iniet atrast atbildi, skatoties atsevi\u0161\u0137i uz objektiem un saikn\u0113m, tas ne vienm\u0113r noder. Ir ar\u012b t\u0101da lieta \u2013 emergenti, jeb rodas \u012bpa\u0161\u012bbas. Tas ir \u012bpa\u0161\u012bbas, kas par\u0101d\u0101s iesaist\u012bt\u0101 sist\u0113m\u0101, un t\u0101s nevar redz\u0113t, skatoties uz objektiem un saikn\u0113m atsevi\u0161\u0137i \u2013 k\u0101 m\u0113s to apskat\u012bj\u0101m iepriek\u0161.<\/p>\n

Emergenti \u012bpa\u0161\u012bbas, ja t\u0101 var teikt, ir sist\u0113mas \u012bpa\u0161\u012bbas kopum\u0101, kad t\u0101 darbojas. Protams, ja pamat\u012bgi un r\u016bp\u012bgi izp\u0113t\u0101m, m\u0113s atrad\u012bsim, no kurienes \u0161\u012bs \u012bpa\u0161\u012bbas n\u0101k. Bet, visticam\u0101k, to ra\u0161an\u0101s iemesls izr\u0101d\u012bsies sare\u017e\u0123\u012bts. Tas b\u016bs saist\u012bts gan ar objekta \u012bpa\u0161\u012bb\u0101m, gan subjekta \u012bpa\u0161\u012bb\u0101m, gan saik\u0146u \u012bpa\u0161\u012bb\u0101m. Zvaigznes sakr\u0101ju\u0161\u0101s, \u012bsum\u0101.<\/p>\n

T\u0101tad, labums rad\u0101s nekurien\u0113. Un t\u0101 notiek \u013coti bie\u017ei.<\/p>\n

J\u016bs las\u0101t tekstu par velosip\u0113distiem Amsterdam\u0101 un atceraties, ka esat aizmirsu\u0161i pa\u0146emt darb\u0101 algu apliec\u012bbu v\u012bzas ieg\u016b\u0161anai \u2013 v\u0113laties vasar\u0101 doties uz j\u016bru, uz Grie\u0137iju. Tekst\u0101 nebija ne v\u012bzas, ne Grie\u0137ijas, ne j\u016bs, ne j\u016bras.<\/p>\n

J\u016bs skat\u0101ties filmu \u00abMatrix\u00bb un nolemjat atmest sm\u0113\u0137\u0113\u0161anu. \u00abMatrix\u00bb neviens nesm\u0113\u0137\u0113. Neviens neapsprie\u017e vesel\u012bga uztura priek\u0161roc\u012bbas \u2013 tie\u0161i pret\u0113ji, periodiski tiek \u0113stas cepumi.<\/p>\n

Es kop\u0101 ar meitu ma\u0161\u012bn\u0101 klausos audiogr\u0101matu \u00abNezin\u012b\u0161a saulainaj\u0101 pils\u0113t\u0101\u00bb, un man k\u013c\u016bst skaidrs, k\u0101p\u0113c noda\u013cas vad\u012bt\u0101js, kur\u0101 ievie\u0161u izmai\u0146as, pretojas. Nezin\u012bt\u012b \u0161\u012bs inform\u0101cijas nebija.<\/p>\n

Es ce\u013c\u0101 uz darbu klausos Metallica dziesmu \u00abRonnie Rising Medley\u00bb (no tribi\u016btl albumu \u00abThis is your Life\u00bb, velt\u012bta Ronnie James Dio) un nolemju atst\u0101t darbu. Bet par ko dziesm\u0101 dzied \u2013 man nav ne jausmas, jo nezinu ang\u013cu valodu.<\/p>\n

J\u016bs saprotat, ka jebkur\u0101 no piem\u0113riem, ja padom\u0101jat, var izsekot dom\u0101\u0161anas \u0137\u0113di un saprast, k\u0101 s\u0101kotn\u0113j\u0101 inform\u0101cija noveda pie secin\u0101juma, l\u0113muma vai r\u012bc\u012bbas. Proti, pie labuma. J\u016bs to varat izdar\u012bt, ja esat subjekts.<\/p>\n

Tie\u0161i t\u0101pat var, ja gribat, izveidot \u0161o \u0137\u0113di jebkur\u0101 sist\u0113m\u0101, kur notika labuma ieg\u016b\u0161ana. Da\u017ereiz tas ir interesanti, lai izklaid\u0113tos, bet to nevar dar\u012bt past\u0101v\u012bgi. Katru dienu rodas p\u0101r\u0101k daudz t\u0101du situ\u0101ciju, tostarp \u2013 neapzin\u0101to. Pat pie jums.<\/p>\n

Bet svar\u012bg\u0101kais ir tas, ka \u0137\u0113de katru reizi b\u016bs at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bga. \u0160\u012b \u0137\u0113de ir emergent\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161\u012bba. Unik\u0101la, kas rad\u0101s vien\u0101 reiz\u0113, neatk\u0101rtojama br\u012bnums. \u0160odien objekts j\u016bsos rada saj\u016btu, l\u0113mumu, domu, apgaismojumu, bet p\u0113c gada \u2013 neko vai tie\u0161i pret\u0113ju.<\/p>\n

T\u0101p\u0113c iesaku necensties mekl\u0113t c\u0113lo\u0146sakar\u012bbas p\u0101r\u0101k bie\u017ei un uzst\u0101j\u012bgi. Lab\u0101k pie\u0146emt un izmantot faktu: labums var rasties jebkur, jebkur\u0101 laik\u0101 un jebkur\u0101 kombin\u0101cij\u0101.<\/p>\n

Labums nesl\u0113pjas rakstos, gr\u0101mat\u0101s, film\u0101s, r\u012bkos, metodolo\u0123ij\u0101s, uz\u0146\u0113mumos, draugos, organiz\u0101cij\u0101s, kopien\u0101s, soci\u0101lajos t\u012bklos. Labums nesl\u0113pjas j\u016bsos. Labums nesl\u0113pjas veid\u0101 un uzved\u012bb\u0101, k\u0101d\u0101 j\u016bs las\u0101t rakstus un gr\u0101matas, skat\u0101ties filmas, izmantojat r\u012bkus un metodolo\u0123ijas, pavad\u0101t laiku ar draugiem un uz\u0146\u0113mumos, str\u0101d\u0101jat organiz\u0101cij\u0101s, piedal\u0101ties kopien\u0101s un soci\u0101lajos t\u012bklos.<\/p>\n

Labums visp\u0101r nekur nesl\u0113pjas. Labums rodas, kad satiekas objekts, subjekts, un starp tiem rodas saite.<\/p>\n

K\u0101du laiku tas izklaus\u0101s stulbi un naivi, vai ne? L\u012bdz\u012bgi k\u0101 labums ir br\u012bnums, debesu manna, kas nokr\u012bt, k\u0101 Zil\u0101 putna, nezin\u0101m\u0101 apst\u0101k\u013cu sakrit\u012bb\u0101? Ko tagad dar\u012bt? M\u0101c\u012bties un gaid\u012bt? Kas tad tie\u0161i notiek ar \u0161\u012bm sist\u0113m\u0101m?<\/p>\n

N\u0113, tie\u0161i izpratne par labuma ieg\u016b\u0161anu caur sist\u0113m\u0101m \u013cauj pareizi novietot akcentus un atrast sviras. Atcerieties, ka sist\u0113misk\u0101 dom\u0101\u0161ana ir ne tikai anal\u012bze (k\u0101p\u0113c t\u0101?), bet ar\u012b sist\u0113mu izmai\u0146as. Ja labuma ieg\u016b\u0161anas sist\u0113ma nestr\u0101d\u0101, tai j\u0101b\u016bt j\u0101maina.<\/p>\n

Tie\u0161i ar to m\u0113s nodarbosimies n\u0101kamreiz. Un m\u0113s ar\u012b parun\u0101sim par to, ka nav nek\u0101 laba labuma ieg\u016b\u0161an\u0101. Iesp\u0113jams, run\u0101sim par Br\u016bsu L\u012b.
\n
Avots: habr.com<\/a><\/p>","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u042d\u0442\u043e \u2013 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u0430\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0437\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u044f \u0438\u0437 \u0432\u0441\u0435\u0445, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u044b \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438. \u041f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043e\u043d\u0430 \u043e \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0435 \u0438 \u0435\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438. \u041d\u0430 \u0435\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u0435\u043d\u044f \u043d\u0430\u0442\u043e\u043b\u043a\u043d\u0443\u043b\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0441 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u043c \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c \u043e\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0438\u0437 \u043f\u043b\u043e\u0449\u0430\u0434\u043e\u043a, \u0433\u0434\u0435 \u044f \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0443\u044e\u0441\u044c. \u0410 \u0434\u043e \u043d\u0435\u0435 \u2013 \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0436\u0434\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0439, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0439 \u0432\u044b \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043a \u043c\u043e\u0438\u043c \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u044f\u043c. \u0410 \u043c\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u043e\u043c \u2013 \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0438 \u0432\u0441\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u044f \u0432\u0438\u0436\u0443 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[702],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"\ud83e\udd47\u0418\u0441[\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443]\u0439 | ProHoster","description":"\u0160\u012b ir visnoder\u012bg\u0101k\u0101 raksts no visiem, ko esat las\u012bju\u0161i. Jo t\u0101 ir par labumu un t\u0101 ieg\u016b\u0161anu. Uzrakst\u012bt to mani iedvesmoja sazi\u0146a ar cien\u012bjamo moderatoru vien\u0101 no platform\u0101m, kur es public\u0113jos.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/blog\/news\/is-polzu-j","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"lv_LV","og:site_name":"ProHoster | \u041a\u0443\u043f\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0436\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0445\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043d\u0433 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0441\u0430\u0439\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u0441 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u043e\u0442 DDoS, VPS VDS \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044b","og:type":"article","og:title":"\ud83e\udd47\u0418\u0441[\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443]\u0439 | ProHoster","og:description":"\u042d\u0442\u043e \u2013 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u0430\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0437\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u044f \u0438\u0437 \u0432\u0441\u0435\u0445, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u044b \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438. \u041f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043e\u043d\u0430 \u043e \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0435 \u0438 \u0435\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438. \u041d\u0430 \u0435\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u0435\u043d\u044f \u043d\u0430\u0442\u043e\u043b\u043a\u043d\u0443\u043b\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0441 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u043c \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c \u043e\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0438\u0437 \u043f\u043b\u043e\u0449\u0430\u0434\u043e\u043a, \u0433\u0434\u0435 \u044f \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0443\u044e\u0441\u044c.","og:url":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/blog\/news\/is-polzu-j","og:image":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/logo-350.jpg","og:image:secure_url":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/logo-350.jpg","og:image:width":350,"og:image:height":350,"article:published_time":"2019-10-31T19:03:05+00:00","article:modified_time":"2019-10-31T19:03:05+00:00","article:publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/prohoster","article:author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/prohoster"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"35228","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":null,"schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"seo_analyzer_scan_date":"2026-01-21 22:25:22","breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"reviewed_by":null,"ai":null,"created":"2021-03-01 02:07:29","updated":"2026-01-21 22:25:22","focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"link","format":"url"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35228","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35228"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35228\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}