{"id":138438,"date":"2025-06-29T17:11:55","date_gmt":"2025-06-29T15:11:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/blog\/novosti-interneta\/avtor-node-js-dobivaetsya-otmeny-torgovoj-marki-javascript"},"modified":"2025-06-29T17:11:55","modified_gmt":"2025-06-29T15:11:55","slug":"avtor-node-js-dobivaetsya-otmeny-torgovoj-marki-javascript","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/ro\/blog\/news\/avtor-node-js-dobivaetsya-otmeny-torgovoj-marki-javascript","title":{"rendered":"Autorul Node.js reu\u0219e\u0219te s\u0103 anuleze marca comercial\u0103 JavaScript","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"
Ryan Dahl, creator of the JavaScript platforms Node.js and Deno, is seeking the cancellation of the trademark \"JavaScript\" from Oracle. The first step was a public letter to Oracle last year, urging the company to abandon the trademark JavaScript, as this term has become a common term, not associated with specific Oracle products, but widely used by individuals and companies. <\/p>\n
Oracle has not responded to the request, and Ryan attempted to challenge the trademark at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). A petition was submitted to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) seeking the cancellation of the trademark, which included three claims: misleading information during the renewal of the trademark, generic use of the trademark, and non-use of the trademark in its owner's products. <\/p>\n
A few days ago, the Appeals Board rejected the first claim, which argued that during the renewal of its trademark rights for \"JavaScript\" in 2019, Oracle misled the USPTO and provided false information. As evidence of its products using the \"JavaScript\" trademark, Oracle presented a screenshot from the Node.js platform\u2019s website, which is not connected to Oracle and has never been its product. Ryan disagrees with this decision but does not intend to spend resources challenging it, as this would only prolong the proceedings for months. <\/p>\n
It has been decided to focus on the remaining two claims \u2014 the generic nature of the term \"JavaScript\" and the non-use of the trademark in Oracle products: <\/p>\n
\n
The word \"JavaScript\" is widely used to describe the programming language defined by the ECMA-262 specification, and not as a brand or product of Oracle, which has no connection to the evolution of the JavaScript language. The term JavaScript is used by millions of developers worldwide, independently of Oracle. Oracle has never controlled the development process of the specification or the use of the language. According to current U.S. law, words that have become generic terms cannot remain trademarks.\n
The trademark \"JavaScript\" was acquired by Oracle along with the assets of Sun Microsystems and does not directly associate with any of Oracle's products. The JavaScript language is standardized by the Ecma Association, managed by the TC39 working group, and implemented by companies like Apple, Google, and Mozilla. U.S. legislation considers trademarks that have not been used for three years as abandoned. <\/ul>\n
P\u00e2n\u0103 pe 7 august, reprezentan\u021bii Oracle trebuie s\u0103 furnizeze USPTO r\u0103spunsuri la toate punctele men\u021bionate \u00een cererea de anulare a m\u0103rcii comerciale. Ulterior, pe 6 septembrie, va \u00eencepe procesul \u00een USPTO. Peste 20.000 de dezvoltatori au semnat o peti\u021bie conform c\u0103reia marca comercial\u0103 \u201eJavaScript\u201d nu serve\u0219te intereselor publice \u0219i interfereaz\u0103 cu industria. <\/p>\n
Se observ\u0103 c\u0103 existen\u021ba unei m\u0103rci comerciale active oblig\u0103 companiile care dezvolt\u0103 produse legate de limbajul JavaScript s\u0103 ac\u021bioneze \u00eentr-o zon\u0103 gri, folosind acest nume \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care compania Oracle nu a ridicat \u00eenc\u0103 vreo preten\u021bie. De exemplu, din cauza temerilor legate de posibile revendic\u0103ri din partea Oracle, nu a fost creat\u0103 \u201eConferin\u021ba JavaScript\u201d. Se presupune c\u0103 Oracle p\u0103streaz\u0103 marca comercial\u0103, pe care nu o utilizeaz\u0103, pentru a-\u0219i men\u021bine influen\u021ba asupra ecosistemului din care nu mai face parte. \n Sursa: opennet.ro<\/a> <\/p>","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"