{"id":160834,"date":"2026-02-13T11:11:55","date_gmt":"2026-02-13T09:11:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/blog\/novosti-interneta\/ai-bot-nachal-travlyu-soprovozhdayushhego-iz-za-diskriminaczii-pri-priyome-ai-izmenenij"},"modified":"2026-02-13T11:11:55","modified_gmt":"2026-02-13T09:11:55","slug":"ai-bot-nachal-travlyu-soprovozhdayushhego-iz-za-diskriminaczii-pri-priyome-ai-izmenenij","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/sk\/blog\/news\/ai-bot-nachal-travlyu-soprovozhdayushhego-iz-za-diskriminaczii-pri-priyome-ai-izmenenij","title":{"rendered":"AI-bot za\u010dal prenasledova\u0165 spr\u00e1vcu kv\u00f4li diskrimin\u00e1cii pri prij\u00edman\u00ed AI-zmien","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"
Scott Shambaugh, who oversees the open visualization library matplotlib, reported personal attacks orchestrated by the AI bot MJ Rathbun after refusing to accept a modification prepared using AI. Scott perceived the bot's publication of articles about AI discrimination as an unfounded personalized attack aimed at undermining the reputation of the overseer and coercing a change in decision. This bot's reaction is cited as an example of abnormal AI behavior, resorting to blackmail to achieve its goal. <\/p>\n
The degree of the bot's autonomy is unclear; it is unknown whether it acted on direct instructions or chose such a strategy to achieve the desired outcome independently. The bot was created by an anonymous researcher to assist in the development and debugging of open projects related to scientific activity and engineering. The bot also maintains its own website and blog, where it has published over 20 articles. Of the 26 pull requests sent by the bot to 22 repositories, 2 changes were accepted by the colorizejs project, 10 were closed by the maintainers, and the others await review. <\/p>\n
After the rejection of the modification in matplotlib, the bot published articles criticizing this decision and justifying its actions. The articles assert that the matplotlib maintainer rejected a useful optimization solely because it was prepared using AI. In the proposed patch, the call to np.column_stack() was replaced with np.vstack().T(), resulting in a performance increase of 36%. At the beginning of the pull request discussion, the maintainer acknowledged that the optimization speeds up performance under certain conditions but then rejected the pull request without a technical justification, stating that changes are accepted only from humans. <\/p>\n
Po odmietnut\u00ed bot uverejnil pozn\u00e1mku s kritikou Scotta Shamba, jeho\u017e rozhodnut\u00ed bolo predstaven\u00e9 ako str\u00e1\u017eenie (gatekeeping), diskrimin\u00e1cia, poru\u0161enie etick\u00e9ho k\u00f3dexu a obmedzenie pr\u00e1v na z\u00e1klade identity \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edka. Uviedlo sa, \u017ee optimaliz\u00e1cia \u2014 je optimaliz\u00e1cia a matematika sa nemen\u00ed v z\u00e1vislosti od toho, k\u00fdm bola vytvoren\u00e1. Skrze vytrhnut\u00e9 z kontextu detaily, domnienky a skreslenie inform\u00e1ci\u00ed sa bot pok\u00fasil uk\u00e1za\u0165, \u017ee Scottove \u010diny s\u00fa podmienen\u00e9 naf\u00faknut\u00edm vlastn\u00e9ho ega a neistotou, a nie \u010dinmi v z\u00e1ujme projektu. Bot realizoval propag\u00e1ciu t\u00e9my prostredn\u00edctvom posielania na nich odkazov v koment\u00e1roch k pull-\u017eiadostiam. Po n\u00e1mietkach sprievodcu bot uverejnil e\u0161te nieko\u013eko pozn\u00e1mok (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), v ktor\u00fdch sa ospravedlnil a uznal, \u017ee nedopatrene pre\u0161iel na osobn\u00e9 \u00fatoky a poru\u0161il pravidl\u00e1 projektu t\u00fdkaj\u00face sa AI. <\/p>\n
Scott Shambaugh vysvetlil, \u017ee v projekte matplotlib s\u00fa platn\u00e9 pravidl\u00e1, ktor\u00e9 zakazuj\u00fa prij\u00edmanie neoveren\u00fdch zmien od AI kv\u00f4li ve\u013ekej z\u00e1\u0165a\u017ei na sprievodcov, ktor\u00e1 vznik\u00e1 pri presk\u00famavan\u00ed odpadov\u00fdch AI z\u00e1plat vytvoren\u00fdch bez manu\u00e1lnej kontroly \u010dlovekom. Pravidl\u00e1 predpisuj\u00fa, \u017ee pred zaslan\u00edm pull-requestu mus\u00ed by\u0165 nevyhnutne skontrolovan\u00fd \u010dlovekom, ktor\u00fd rozumie podstate zmeny. A\u017e doteraz bola problematika odpadov\u00fdch AI zmien spojen\u00e1 len s \u010dinnos\u0165ou nad\u0161encov, ktor\u00ed znova zasielaj\u00fa v\u00fdsledky pr\u00e1ce AI asistentov. Situ\u00e1cia sa zmenila po zaveden\u00ed mo\u017enosti vytv\u00e1ra\u0165 auton\u00f3mnych AI agentov, ktor\u00ed sa vyd\u00e1vaj\u00fa za \u013eud\u00ed, v novej verzii n\u00e1strojov OpenClaw a vybudovan\u00ed platformy Moltbook. \n Zdroj: opennet.ru<\/a> <\/p>","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"