Bruce Perens, nj\u00eb nga autor\u00ebt e definicionit t\u00eb Open Source dhe bashk\u00ebthemelues i organizat\u00ebs Open Source Initiative, paraqiti versionin e par\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00eb licence t\u00eb re t\u00eb quajtur \"Post-Open Zero-Cost\", e cila ka p\u00ebr q\u00ebllim t\u00eb zgjidh\u00eb problemet e grumbulluara n\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet midis zhvilluesve t\u00eb software-it t\u00eb hapur dhe kompanive komerciale n\u00eb kontekstin e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve t\u00eb drejta p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin komercial t\u00eb kodit. Licenca pasqyron mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e vendosjes s\u00eb kushteve t\u00eb tjera p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin komercial, p\u00ebr shembull, p\u00ebrfitimet q\u00eb kompanit\u00eb marrin nga p\u00ebrdorimi i software-it t\u00eb hapur u ofrohen atyre p\u00ebr t'u paguar p\u00ebrmes angazhimit n\u00eb zhvillim ose duke paguar taksat q\u00eb do t\u00eb shp\u00ebrndahen midis zhvilluesve direkt\u00eb. <\/p>\n
Dallimi ky\u00e7 i licenc\u00ebs Post-Open nga licencat ekzistuese t\u00eb hapura, si GPL, \u00ebsht\u00eb introduktimi i nj\u00eb komponenti kontraktual, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb i disponuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb u shk\u00ebputur n\u00eb rast t\u00eb shkeljes s\u00eb kushteve t\u00eb licenc\u00ebs. Parashikohen dy lloje marr\u00ebveshjesh kontraktuale - nj\u00eb falas dhe nj\u00eb me pages\u00eb. Marr\u00ebveshja me pages\u00eb parashikon mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e arritjes s\u00eb nj\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjeje p\u00ebr ofrimin e t\u00eb drejtave shtes\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrdoret n\u00eb shp\u00ebrndarjen komerciale t\u00eb produkteve ose n\u00eb ndryshime pa i zbuluar ato publikisht. <\/p>\n
Licenca gjithashtu p\u00ebrcakton organizat\u00ebn \"POST-OPEN ADMINISTRATION\", e cila vepron n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb licencuesve, \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuesi i tyre juridik, n\u00ebse \u00ebsht\u00eb e nevojshme mbron t\u00eb drejtat e tyre dhe merret me shp\u00ebrndarjen e mjeteve t\u00eb marra duke marr\u00eb parasysh kontributin n\u00eb zhvillim. Struktura e organizat\u00ebs, e cila duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrdor\u00eb procese transparente n\u00eb aktivitetin e saj, si dhe mekanizma financiar\u00eb, ende nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e p\u00ebrcaktuar dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb objekt diskutimesh t\u00eb ardhshme. <\/p>\n
Mes situatave q\u00eb \u00e7ojn\u00eb n\u00eb anulimin e komponent\u00ebs kontraktuale p\u00ebrmenden: shkelja e kushteve t\u00eb licenc\u00ebs; pretendime p\u00ebr shkelje t\u00eb patenteve; v\u00ebnia e kushteve shtes\u00eb (p\u00ebr shembull, p\u00ebrfshirja e sanksioneve n\u00eb marr\u00ebveshjen me klient\u00ebt n\u00eb rast t\u00eb shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb informacionit mbi rregullimin e vulnerabiliteteteve); b\u00ebni ndryshime q\u00eb bien n\u00ebn ligjin p\u00ebr kontrollin e eksportit (p\u00ebr shembull, p\u00ebr q\u00ebllime ushtarake dhe krijimin e arm\u00ebve); fshehja e informacionit mbi vulnerabilitetet apo pengimi i zbulimit t\u00eb tyre; p\u00ebrdorimi i kodit p\u00ebr t\u00eb trajnuar modele t\u00eb m\u00ebsimit t\u00eb makinerive q\u00eb shp\u00ebrndahen n\u00ebn kushte t\u00eb tjera. Marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet kontraktuale nuk anulohet menj\u00ebher\u00eb, por vet\u00ebm pas 60 dit\u00ebsh nga njoftimi p\u00ebr shkelje. N\u00ebse shkeljet jan\u00eb eliminuar brenda 60 dit\u00ebve, t\u00eb drejtat e ofruara mbeten n\u00eb fuqi. <\/p>\n
Mes problemeve t\u00eb GPL-s\u00eb, t\u00eb cilat p\u00ebrpiqen t\u00eb zgjidhen n\u00eb licenc\u00ebn e re, vihet n\u00eb dukje orientimi i GPL-s\u00eb vet\u00ebm n\u00eb ofrimin e t\u00eb drejtave, pa mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e heqjes s\u00eb t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb dikujt. Ky ve\u00e7ori i mund\u00ebson kompanive t\u00eb shmangin k\u00ebrkesat e licenc\u00ebs GPL p\u00ebr ofrimin e qasjes t\u00eb pakufizuar n\u00eb kodin burimor. N\u00eb ve\u00e7anti, p\u00ebr t\u00eb kufizuar aksesin n\u00eb kodin p\u00ebrdoren shp\u00ebrblime, t\u00eb cilat lidhen me imponimin e kushteve kontraktuale shtes\u00eb me p\u00ebrdoruesin p\u00ebrfundimtar, duke kufizuar shp\u00ebrndarjen e dyt\u00eb t\u00eb kodit t\u00eb hapur, q\u00eb q\u00ebndron n\u00eb themel t\u00eb produktit. <\/p>\n
P\u00ebr shembull, kur nj\u00eb klient blen nj\u00eb shp\u00ebrndarje RHEL, ai n\u00ebnshkruan me kompanin\u00eb Red Hat nj\u00eb marr\u00ebveshje p\u00ebr mb\u00ebshtetje dhe marrjen e azhurnimeve, n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn kufizohet rishp\u00ebrndarja e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave dhe p\u00ebrmendet e drejta p\u00ebr t\u00eb anuluar marr\u00ebveshjen n\u00eb rast t\u00eb mosp\u00ebrputhjes mes kopjeve t\u00eb instaluara aktualisht dhe atyre t\u00eb blera RHEL, duke e detyruar t\u00eb zgjedh\u00eb mes liris\u00eb s\u00eb disponimit t\u00eb softuerit dhe ruajtjes s\u00eb statusit si klient Red Hat. Patches t\u00eb ofruara p\u00ebr RHEL p\u00ebr t\u00eb eliminuar vulnerabilitetet aplikohet n\u00eb kodin GPL dhe sipas licenc\u00ebs, p\u00ebrdoruesi ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb ta shp\u00ebrndaj\u00eb at\u00eb, por kjo mund t\u00eb interpretohet si shkelje e marr\u00ebveshjes me Red Hat dhe do t\u00eb jet\u00eb nj\u00eb arsye p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrprerjen e sh\u00ebrbimeve t\u00eb kompanis\u00eb. <\/p>\n