Nj\u00eb diskutim i ri midis Linus Torvalds dhe Kent Overstreet, autor i Bcachefs, p\u00ebrfundoi me k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00eb Linus shprehu gatishm\u00ebrin\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb kodin Bcachefs nga b\u00ebrthama e Linux 6.17. N\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn koh\u00eb, Linus p\u00ebrfshiu n\u00eb b\u00ebrtham\u00ebn 6.16 ndryshimet n\u00eb Bcachefs, t\u00eb cilat ishin subjekt i pak\u00ebnaq\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb re p\u00ebr veprimet e Kentit. Linus shkroi: <\/p>\n
\nMendoj se rrug\u00ebt tona do t\u00eb ndahen n\u00eb dritaren e bashkimit 6.17. <\/p>\n
Ju e keni b\u00ebr\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb qart\u00eb q\u00eb un\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb v\u00eb n\u00eb dyshim asnj\u00eb rregullim gabimi dhe duhet thjesht t\u00eb pranoja gjith\u00e7ka. <\/p>\n
Sinqer\u00eb, nuk ndihem ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht rehat, duke qen\u00eb i p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb gjith\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb, dhe e vetmja gj\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ne t\u00eb dy, duket se jemi v\u00ebrtet dakord gjat\u00eb diskutimit, \u00ebsht\u00eb se \"ne kemi p\u00ebrfunduar.\" <\/p><\/blockquote>\n
P\u00ebrgjigjja paraprake ndaj k\u00ebtij deklarimi mes Kentit dhe Linusit \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb personale dhe detajet ende nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb qarta. Megjithat\u00eb, n\u00eb diskutimin e k\u00ebtij subjekti, Kenti shkroi se ndoshta fjal\u00ebt e tij n\u00eb bised\u00eb private ishin interpretuar gabim dhe ai nuk beson se BcacheFS duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtohet nga b\u00ebrthama. Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb i gatsh\u00ebm t\u00eb nd\u00ebrpres\u00eb shp\u00ebrndarjen e Bcachefs n\u00eb b\u00ebrtham\u00ebn kryesore t\u00eb Linux dhe kjo nuk do ta shkat\u00ebrroj\u00eb projektin, megjithat\u00eb do t\u00eb jet\u00eb nj\u00eb problem i madh. N\u00eb rast se Bcachefs hiqet, zhvillimi do t\u00eb vazhdoj\u00eb dhe ky sistem do t\u00eb shp\u00ebrndahet si nj\u00eb modul DKMS. Kenti vuri gjithashtu n\u00eb dukje se p\u00ebrjashtimi i BcacheFS nga b\u00ebrthama do t\u00eb ishte opsioni m\u00eb i mir\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb dhe Linus, por k\u00ebt\u00eb do t\u00eb ishte padyshim nj\u00eb zgjidhje m\u00eb e keqe p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdoruesit dhe komunitetin e zhvilluesve. <\/p>\n
Kontestet midis Kentit dhe Linusit jan\u00eb shkaktuar nga shkeljet e vazhdueshme t\u00eb rregullave p\u00ebr d\u00ebrgimin e ndryshimeve dhe rregullimeve n\u00eb b\u00ebrtham\u00eb. Kenti beson se rregullimet e problemeve n\u00eb sistemin e skedar\u00ebve duhet t\u00eb avancohen menj\u00ebher\u00eb dhe me \u00e7do mjet q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb dispozicion. Linus insistion se ndryshime funksionale dhe rregullime t\u00eb m\u00ebdha jan\u00eb t\u00eb lejuara n\u00eb fillim t\u00eb zhvillimit t\u00eb nj\u00eb dege t\u00eb re t\u00eb b\u00ebrtham\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa kandidat\u00ebt e vonsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr l\u00ebshim p\u00ebrqendrohen vet\u00ebm n\u00eb rregullimin e gabimeve. Kenti shpesh shkel k\u00ebt\u00eb rregull dhe d\u00ebrgon ndryshime t\u00eb m\u00ebdha n\u00eb moment t\u00eb pap\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm, q\u00eb \u00e7on n\u00eb pak\u00ebnaq\u00ebsi t\u00eb Linusit dhe nj\u00eb val\u00eb t\u00eb re kontestesh. M\u00eb par\u00eb, Linus kishte paralajm\u00ebruar Kentin p\u00ebr d\u00ebshir\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb hequr Bcachefs nga b\u00ebrtham\u00ebn kryesore, pasi Kenti vazhdon t\u00eb luaj\u00eb vet\u00ebm n\u00eb sandsin e tij, nuk angazhohet n\u00eb pun\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrbashk\u00ebt dhe nuk d\u00ebshiron t\u00eb pranoj\u00eb rregullat e loj\u00ebs s\u00eb komunitetit t\u00eb zhvilluesve t\u00eb b\u00ebrtham\u00ebs. <\/p>\n
N\u00eb rastin e b\u00ebrtham\u00ebs 6.16, Kent d\u00ebrgoi nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb patchesh p\u00ebr t'u p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrdit\u00ebsimin RC3, mes t\u00eb cilave ishte patchi me zbatimin e opsionit t\u00eb ri \"journal_rewind.\" Linus shkroi se Kent harroi se pasi u mbyll dritarja e pranimit t\u00eb ndryshimeve funksionale, nuk lejohet shtimi i funksionaliteteve t\u00eb reja n\u00eb b\u00ebrtham\u00eb, edhe n\u00ebse lidhen me rregullimin e defekteve t\u00eb tjera, pasi shtimi i mund\u00ebsive t\u00eb reja n\u00eb fazat e vonshme t\u00eb formimit t\u00eb l\u00ebshimit mund t\u00eb shkaktoj\u00eb regresione. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, Bcachefs vazhdon t\u00eb pozicionohet si nj\u00eb sistem filesh eksperimental dhe urgjenca e elimimin t\u00eb defekteve n\u00eb t\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb kaq kritike. <\/p>\n
Kent p\u00ebrgjigjej se q\u00ebllimi kryesor i zhvillimit \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb ofroj\u00eb p\u00ebrdoruesve kod t\u00eb funksionuar, prandaj ai nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i gatsh\u00ebm t\u00eb t\u00ebrhiqet n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjet q\u00eb kan\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me rregullimin e defekteve q\u00eb ndikojn\u00eb n\u00eb ruajtjen e integritetit t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave. N\u00eb dallim nga subsistem\u00ebt e tjer\u00eb, defektet n\u00eb sistemet e fichiers nuk zgjidhen duke e rinisur sistemin dhe mund t\u00eb \u00e7ojn\u00eb n\u00eb d\u00ebmtimin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave, prandaj, sipas Kentit, vonimi i rregullimit t\u00eb tyre deri n\u00eb dritaren e ardhshme t\u00eb pranimit t\u00eb ndryshimeve \u00ebsht\u00eb i papranuesh\u00ebm, edhe n\u00ebse nj\u00eb rregullim i till\u00eb k\u00ebrkon nd\u00ebrrime t\u00eb m\u00ebdha. <\/p>\n