{"id":163337,"date":"2026-03-06T23:11:59","date_gmt":"2026-03-06T21:11:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/blog\/novosti-interneta\/perepisyvanie-koda-pri-pomoshhi-ai-dlya-pereliczenzirovaniya-otkrytyh-proektov"},"modified":"2026-03-06T23:11:59","modified_gmt":"2026-03-06T21:11:59","slug":"perepisyvanie-koda-pri-pomoshhi-ai-dlya-pereliczenzirovaniya-otkrytyh-proektov","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/sq\/blog\/novosti-interneta\/perepisyvanie-koda-pri-pomoshhi-ai-dlya-pereliczenzirovaniya-otkrytyh-proektov","title":{"rendered":"Rikthimi i kodeve me ndihm\u00ebn e AI p\u00ebr riligjin e projekteve t\u00eb hapura","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"
Dan Blanchard, zhvilluesi i bibliotek\u00ebs chardet p\u00ebr p\u00ebrcaktimin e kodimit t\u00eb karaktereve n\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn Python, ka l\u00ebshuar nj\u00eb version t\u00eb ri t\u00eb bibliotek\u00ebs n\u00ebn nj\u00eb licenc\u00eb t\u00eb re. N\u00eb versionin 7.0, p\u00ebrdoret licenca MIT n\u00eb vend t\u00eb licenc\u00ebs LGPL. Zhvilluesi pretendon se asistenti AI Anthropic Claude, i cili tani \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb list\u00ebn e kontribuuesve, ka shkruar p\u00ebrs\u00ebri bibliotek\u00ebn pa p\u00ebrdorur kodin origjinal, duke i mund\u00ebsuar t\u00eb z\u00ebvend\u00ebsoj\u00eb licenc\u00ebn copyleft me nj\u00eb licenc\u00eb permissive. <\/p>\n
Nj\u00eb p\u00ebrdorues q\u00eb paraqitet si Mark Pilgrim, krijuesi origjinal i bibliotek\u00ebs, u bashkua n\u00eb diskutimin e k\u00ebsaj veprimi (p\u00ebr fat t\u00eb keq, llogaria e k\u00ebtij p\u00ebrdoruesi \u00ebsht\u00eb bosh dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb e pamundur t\u00eb verifikohet n\u00ebse ai \u00ebsht\u00eb ai q\u00eb thot\u00eb se \u00ebsht\u00eb) dhe krijoi nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ai thot\u00eb se Dan nuk ka t\u00eb drejta p\u00ebr t\u00eb ndryshuar licenc\u00ebn e projektit. <\/p>\n
Dan kund\u00ebrshtoi, duke th\u00ebn\u00eb se ai kishte krahasuar versionet 7.0.0 dhe 6.0.0 me ndihm\u00ebn e nj\u00eb biblioteke p\u00ebr zbulimin e plagjiatur\u00ebs dhe ngjashm\u00ebria midis versioneve ishte m\u00eb pak se 1.3%. Sipas tij, asnj\u00eb skedar n\u00eb baz\u00ebn e kodit t\u00eb versionit 7.0.0 nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i ngjash\u00ebm n\u00eb struktur\u00eb me ndonj\u00eb skedar nga ndonj\u00eb l\u00ebshim t\u00eb m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm. <\/p>\n
Den tha se d\u00ebshironte q\u00eb biblioteka chardet t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihej n\u00eb bibliotek\u00ebn standarde Python, sepse ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb var\u00ebsi ky\u00e7e p\u00ebr shum\u00eb projekte n\u00eb Python. Por integrimi pengohej nga tri barrier\u00eb \u2014 licenca, shpejt\u00ebsia dhe sakt\u00ebsia. Si rezultat i pun\u00ebs s\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb, shpejt\u00ebsia e identifikimit t\u00eb kodimit nga biblioteka u rrit 48 her\u00eb. P\u00ebr nj\u00eb projekt q\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret aktivisht n\u00eb shum\u00eb projekte t\u00eb tjera, kjo optimizim do t\u00eb sjell\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsim t\u00eb duksh\u00ebm t\u00eb performanc\u00ebs p\u00ebr miliona p\u00ebrdorues (paketi shkarkohet rreth 130 milion her\u00eb n\u00eb muaj). <\/p>\n
Zoe Koyman, drejtoresha e Fondacionit p\u00ebr Softin e Lir\u00eb, i tha publikimit The Register: \"Nuk mund t\u00eb komentojm\u00eb detaje t\u00eb caktuara ose ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e k\u00ebtij projekti pa b\u00ebr\u00eb k\u00ebrkime shtes\u00eb ose konsultime me avokat\u00ebt, por nuk ka asgj\u00eb 't\u00eb past\u00ebr' n\u00eb faktin q\u00eb nj\u00eb model i madh gjuh\u00ebsor (LLM) p\u00ebrdor kod q\u00eb i k\u00ebrkohet t\u00eb riaplikohet.\" <\/p>\n
N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kontekst, Zoe vendosi t\u00eb jap\u00eb nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim moral p\u00ebr veprimin e Denit: \"Sa i p\u00ebrket kuptimit t\u00eb GPL, licenca permissive teknikisht \u00ebsht\u00eb ende nj\u00eb licenc\u00eb software t\u00eb lir\u00eb, por minimi i copyleft \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb veprim serioz. Refuzimi p\u00ebr t'u ofruar t\u00eb tjer\u00ebve t\u00eb drejtat q\u00eb keni marr\u00eb si p\u00ebrdorues \u00ebsht\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonisht antisosial, pavar\u00ebsisht nga metoda q\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret.\" <\/p>\n
Bruce Perens, autor i definicionit origjinal t\u00eb kodit burimor t\u00eb hapur, shprehu shqet\u00ebsim p\u00ebr situat\u00ebn e krijuar: \"Ndryshimet sociale q\u00eb po vijn\u00eb jan\u00eb t\u00eb m\u00ebdha, dhe, si\u00e7 e shohim, akoma m\u00eb t\u00eb frikshme.\" <\/p>\n
Pasojat juridike t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb nj\u00eb modeli t\u00eb madh gjuh\u00ebsor p\u00ebr t\u00eb ripar\u00eb projekte t\u00eb hapura dhe t\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb (t\u00eb cilat kishin kodin e vjedhur) jan\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebshtira p\u00ebr t'u parashikuar dhe varen shum\u00eb nga precedentet e krijuara nga gjykatat. Megjithat\u00eb, n\u00ebse nj\u00eb model i madh gjuh\u00ebsor shkruan p\u00ebrs\u00ebri kod n\u00eb nj\u00eb gjuh\u00eb programuese q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb ndryshe nga origjinali, at\u00ebher\u00eb t\u00eb provosh krijimin e nj\u00eb vepre derivative b\u00ebhet praktikisht e pamundur. <\/p>\n
Koh\u00ebt e fundit, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb e Shtet\u00ebve t\u00eb Bashkuara refuzoi t\u00eb rishikonte \u00e7\u00ebshtjen \"Thaler kund\u00ebr Perlmutters\", n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn padit\u00ebsi p\u00ebrpiqej t\u00eb anullonte vendimin e gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb m\u00ebparshme, sipas s\u00eb cil\u00ebs ai nuk mund t\u00eb mbronte me t\u00eb drejtat e autorit nj\u00eb imazh t\u00eb krijuar nga inteligjenca artificiale. Gjykata e Lart\u00eb la n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb m\u00ebparshme q\u00eb veprat e krijuara plot\u00ebsisht nga AI nuk mbrohen nga t\u00eb drejtat e autorit. \n Burimi: opennet.ru<\/a> <\/p>","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"