<\/a><\/noindex>Tani q\u00eb e lexoni k\u00ebt\u00eb, ndoshta mendoni \u2013 po, un\u00eb e di k\u00ebt\u00eb. Provoni ta kujtoni k\u00ebt\u00eb, kur her\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb shkruani nj\u00eb koment si 'k\u00ebtu nuk ka asgj\u00eb t\u00eb dobishme', ose t\u00eb diskutoni me dik\u00eb rreth dobis\u00eb s\u00eb di\u00e7kaje, ose madje t\u00eb mendoni p\u00ebr dobin\u00eb n\u00eb vetmi. Ju siguroj se \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb t\u00eb mbani mend subjektivitetin e dobis\u00eb. Gjithmon\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb e leht\u00eb ta shikoni dobin\u00eb si nj\u00eb atribut objektiv t\u00eb objektit t\u00eb studimit \u2013 nj\u00eb artikull, nj\u00eb lib\u00ebr, nj\u00eb film, nj\u00eb mjet etj.<\/p>\n
Un\u00eb tani nuk po i kund\u00ebrshtoj juve \u2013 po m\u00eb v\u00ebshtir\u00eb q\u00eb n\u00eb momentin e duhur t\u00eb mbaj mend subjektivitetin, relativitetin e dobis\u00eb. Ne jemi n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn anije, dhe n\u00eb at\u00eb anije kemi rreth 7 miliard\u00eb.<\/p>\n
\u00c7far\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb 'subjektivitet'? E gjith\u00eb kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb e thjesht\u00eb. Ka nj\u00eb objekt \u2013 nj\u00eb artikull, nj\u00eb lib\u00ebr, nj\u00eb film, nj\u00eb mjet, nj\u00eb metodologji etj. Ka nj\u00eb subjekt \u2013 ju, ose un\u00eb, ose Gena, ose nj\u00eb moderator i mrekulluesh\u00ebm n\u00eb nj\u00eb platform\u00eb. Dhe k\u00ebshtu objekti dhe subjekti jan\u00eb p\u00ebrball\u00eb \u2013 Gena lexon artikullin. Dhe nxjerr nj\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebrfundimi tradicional i Gena-s s\u00eb zakonsh\u00ebm \u2013 n\u00eb objekt nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi. T\u00eb kalojm\u00eb p\u00ebrpara rasteve kur Gena \u00ebsht\u00eb jo adekuat \u2013 le t\u00eb jet\u00eb ai nj\u00eb njeri t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht i arsyesh\u00ebm, nj\u00eb subjekt i mir\u00eb. \u00c7far\u00eb i mungon fraz\u00ebs 'n\u00eb objekt nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi'?<\/p>\n
Duke iu referuar subjektivizmit t\u00eb dobis\u00eb, dy fjal\u00eb mungojn\u00eb \u2013 'p\u00ebr mua'. N\u00eb objekt nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi p\u00ebr mua. Tani ting\u00ebllon ndryshe, apo jo? Sepse p\u00ebrve\u00e7 Genes, artikullin e lexon Vasja, Seriozha dhe Vika. Le t\u00eb themi se Vika e thot\u00eb ndryshe \u2013 'n\u00eb objekt ka dobi p\u00ebr mua'.<\/p>\n
N\u00ebse, p\u00ebr fat t\u00eb keq, ata takohen n\u00eb komentet p\u00ebr objektin, mund t\u00eb fluturojn\u00eb shk\u00ebndija dhe t\u00eb skuqen minuset dhe t\u00eb kalohet n\u00eb personalitete. Por mjafton, kur shprehni mendimin tuaj, t\u00eb sqaroni se ka dobi ose nuk ka 'p\u00ebr mua', dhe duket se nuk ka asgj\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u2019u debatuar. Dhe nj\u00eb verdikt p\u00ebrfundimtar \u2013 ka dobi, ose nuk ka \u2013 thjesht nuk do t\u00eb vij\u00eb, sepse nuk do t\u00eb ket\u00eb kuptim.<\/p>\n
Sigurisht, dikush do t\u00eb shkruaj\u00eb q\u00eb nuk ka dobi, por t\u00eb gjith\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt do ta kuptojn\u00eb menj\u00ebher\u00eb \u2013 njeriu thjesht po t\u00ebrheq v\u00ebmendjen ndaj vetes. Sepse nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb fjala p\u00ebr t\u00eb prishur humorin e autorit, si\u00e7 ndodhte zakonisht. Njeriu, n\u00ebse e shikoni realisht, po i hedh llom\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00ebve t\u00eb pranish\u00ebm. N\u00ebse ta thjeshtojm\u00eb, ai po thot\u00eb: 't\u00eb gjith\u00eb ju jeni gabim'.<\/p>\n
Sepse kontradita \u00ebsht\u00eb evidente. Nj\u00eb thot\u00eb \u2013 'gjeta dobi k\u00ebtu p\u00ebr veten time'. K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb, ka dobi. Tjetri thot\u00eb \u2013 'k\u00ebtu nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi'. K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb, i pari, ai q\u00eb gjeti dobi, \u00ebsht\u00eb gabim.<\/p>\n
Po \u00e7far\u00eb ndodhi me autorin? Ky djal\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb krejt jasht\u00eb. N\u00ebse shikoni dobin\u00eb si nj\u00eb fenomen subjektiv, at\u00ebher\u00eb autori n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb ekuacion nuk merr pjes\u00eb fare. Po, ai krijoi objektin. Por kur erdhi subjekti, autori nuk ishte m\u00eb atje.<\/p>\n
Sigurisht, ai mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrpiqet t\u00eb arrij\u00eb diellin q\u00eb po per\u00ebndon, duke ndihmuar me shpjegime t\u00eb m\u00ebtejshme n\u00eb komentet, por n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, mendoj se \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb pozicion i gabuar \u2013 autori nuk do t\u00eb m\u00ebsoj\u00eb ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb t\u00eb shkruaj\u00eb tekste t\u00eb mira, n\u00ebse mendimi 'ah, mir\u00eb, m\u00eb von\u00eb do t\u00eb shpjegoj n\u00eb komentet, n\u00ebse ka ndonj\u00eb' do t\u00eb q\u00ebndroj\u00eb n\u00eb n\u00ebnnd\u00ebrgjegje. Por kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr artikuj. Libri \u2013 n\u00eb nj\u00eb mas\u00eb shum\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb vog\u00ebl, pasi ato redaktohen. N\u00eb projektet e zbatimit, t\u00eb cilat gjithashtu jan\u00eb objekte p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi, autori \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb pranin\u00eb e subjektit gjat\u00eb muajve, duke i ndihmuar atij t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi.<\/p>\n
Prandaj, her\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr kur t\u00eb diskutoni ose shkruani p\u00ebr dobin\u00eb e di\u00e7kaje, provoje t\u00eb shtosh dy fjal\u00eb magjike: n\u00eb objekt nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi p\u00ebr mua.<\/p>\n
Por kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e gjitha e v\u00ebrteta. A nuk ju shqet\u00ebson fjala 'nuk' n\u00eb fraz\u00ebn 'n\u00eb objekt nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi'? Ndoshta, Gena u ngut?<\/p>\n
Nxjerrja<\/h4>\n \nKa nj\u00eb shprehje t\u00eb njohur \u2013 t\u00eb nxjerr\u00ebsh dobi. Aq e njohur, saq\u00eb kuptimi i saj tashm\u00eb nuk perceptohet. Tani ndaluni dhe mendoni p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb fraz\u00eb dhe at\u00eb q\u00eb q\u00ebndron pas saj.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr shembull, keni lexuar ndonj\u00eb artikull. E dini vet\u00eb se leximi mund t\u00eb b\u00ebhet n\u00eb m\u00ebnyra t\u00eb ndryshme. Mund t\u00eb lexoni shpejt, duke kaluar ngadal\u00eb, duke iu kushtuar v\u00ebmendje vet\u00ebm frazave t\u00eb theksuara. Mund t\u00eb lexoni, duke menduar p\u00ebr di\u00e7ka tjet\u00ebr dhe nuk do t\u00eb kuptoni fare kuptimin e lexuar. Mund t\u00eb lexoni duke v\u00ebn\u00eb re vet\u00ebm gramatik\u00ebn e autorit. Mund t\u00eb lexoni p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjetur di\u00e7ka p\u00ebr t\u00eb komentuar. Mund t\u00eb lexoni me v\u00ebmendje, duke analizuar \u00e7do shembull dhe p\u00ebrfundim. Mund ta printoni dhe ta lexoni me nj\u00eb laps, duke b\u00ebr\u00eb sh\u00ebnime n\u00eb margjin\u00eb dhe duke theksuar at\u00eb q\u00eb duket interesant. Pas leximit, mund t\u00eb shkruani vet\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrmbledhje, duke theksuar kuptimin kryesor t\u00eb artikullit. Dhe k\u00ebshtu me radh\u00eb.<\/p>\n
\u00c7far\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb ndryshimi? N\u00eb q\u00ebllime dhe p\u00ebrpjekje. Q\u00ebllimet p\u00ebr momentin nuk do ti diskutoj, ato nuk jan\u00eb n\u00eb tem\u00ebn e artikullit. Le t\u00eb supozojm\u00eb se lexuesi, subjekti yn\u00eb, ka nj\u00eb q\u00ebllim \u2013 t\u00eb marr\u00eb dobi.
Ka nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr shprehje t\u00eb zakonshme \u2013 \"e shpifur dhe e vendosur n\u00eb goj\u00eb\". N\u00ebse e vazhdojm\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb analogji, ju jeni trupi juaj, nd\u00ebrsa objekti nga i cili duhet t\u00eb nxirrni dobi \u00ebsht\u00eb ushqimi, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb vendosur brenda jush. Detyra juaj \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb mos e kaloni vet\u00ebm objektin, por t\u00eb merrni maksimumin \u2013 proteina, yndyra, karbohidrate, vitamina, mikroelemente, etj.<\/p>\n
Nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e k\u00ebsaj pune do t\u00eb kryhet vet\u00eb \u2013 p\u00ebr shembull, fal\u00eb mikroflor\u00ebs intestine. Por shumic\u00ebn e pun\u00ebs do t\u00eb duhet ta b\u00ebni vet\u00eb. Fillimisht do t\u00eb punoni me dh\u00ebmb\u00ebt, gjuh\u00ebn dhe gj\u00ebndrat e p\u00ebshtym\u00ebs. M\u00eb pas, ezofagu do t\u00eb ket\u00eb disa probleme p\u00ebr nj\u00eb minut\u00eb. M\u00eb pas, stomaku do t\u00eb kaloj\u00eb disa or\u00eb duke e l\u00ebvizur k\u00ebt\u00eb p\u00ebrzierje nga muri n\u00eb mur, duke kryer nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht trajtimin kimik t\u00eb ushqimit me l\u00ebngun stomakor. M\u00eb pas disa seksione t\u00eb zorr\u00ebve do t\u00eb fillojn\u00eb t\u00eb funksionojn\u00eb, secila do t\u00eb kryej\u00eb funksionin e saj, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb edhe at\u00eb fizik \u2013 t\u00eb shtyj\u00eb ushqimin p\u00ebrpara. Dhe, n\u00eb fund, do t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb nj\u00eb katarsis.<\/p>\n
\u00c7do gj\u00eb q\u00eb trupi b\u00ebn me ushqimin \u2013 \u00ebsht\u00eb nxjerrja e dobis\u00eb. Po, ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb ndodh q\u00eb dobia e vetme nga puna e trupit \u00ebsht\u00eb nxjerrja e saj sa m\u00eb shpejt nga trupi \u2013 ndodhin edhe ushqime t\u00eb tilla. Por, n\u00eb shumic\u00ebn e rasteve, p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebni p\u00ebrpjekje.<\/p>\n
Tani imagjinoni se ju, si trupi i njeriut, ndaloni s\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi. Filloni duke ndaluar s\u00eb gufituari dhe g\u00eblltituri \u2013 si njer\u00ebzit q\u00eb ndodhen n\u00eb koma ose ata q\u00eb vendosin vet\u00eb ta l\u00ebn\u00eb veten t\u00eb uritur. \u00c7far\u00eb do t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb m\u00eb pas?<\/p>\n
Varet nga mjedisi juaj. N\u00ebse ka njer\u00ebz q\u00eb duan t'ju ndihmojn\u00eb, at\u00ebher\u00eb ose do t'ju vendosin nj\u00eb tub n\u00eb fyt p\u00ebr ushqim t\u00eb l\u00ebngsh\u00ebm, ose do t'ju ushqejn\u00eb me forc\u00eb. Pra, do ta b\u00ebjn\u00eb objektin m\u00eb t\u00eb thjesht\u00eb p\u00ebr nxjerrjen e dobis\u00eb. Madje, do ta b\u00ebjn\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb p\u00ebr ju, sepse ky objekt nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb \"p\u00ebr dh\u00ebmb\u00ebt\" tuaj. Po ashtu, p\u00ebr shembull, nuk mundem t\u00eb lexoj artikuj n\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn kineze, pavar\u00ebsisht nga dobia q\u00eb mund t\u00eb fshihet atje \u2013 thjesht nuk do t\u00eb mund t\u00eb filloj as nxjerrjen e dobis\u00eb.<\/p>\n
N\u00ebse, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 ndalimit t\u00eb bluarjes s\u00eb ushqimit, trupi juaj ndalon edhe fazat tjera t\u00eb procesimit t\u00eb tij, at\u00ebher\u00eb \u2013 gjith\u00e7ka. N\u00eb libra, megjithat\u00eb, thuhet se zorr\u00ebt do t\u00eb vazhdojn\u00eb t\u00eb funksionojn\u00eb, sepse kan\u00eb sistemin e tyre nervor, por zorr\u00ebt jan\u00eb t\u00eb pakta.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi nga ushqimi, trupi po b\u00ebn p\u00ebrpjekje t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme. Pa k\u00ebt\u00eb, nuk funksionon. Ne jemi thjesht m\u00ebsuar me k\u00ebt\u00eb dhe nuk e perceptojm\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje si p\u00ebrpjekje.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi nga objekte t\u00eb tjera, do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebni p\u00ebrpjekje. Po, pra, ju keni zgjedhje, ndryshe nga trupi juaj, por formula mbetet e nj\u00ebjt\u00eb: n\u00ebse d\u00ebshiron dobi \u2013 b\u00ebj p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb at\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Kthehemi te fundi i seksionit t\u00eb m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm: \"objekti nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi\". Tani, duke e kuptuar se p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi nevojiten p\u00ebrpjekjet e subjektit, mund t\u00eb modifikojm\u00eb fraz\u00ebn: \"nuk mund t\u00eb nxirrja asnj\u00eb dobi nga objekti\". Megjithat\u00eb, kjo ting\u00ebllon akoma ngjash\u00ebm. N\u00eb shumic\u00ebn e rasteve, ajo ting\u00ebllon k\u00ebshtu: \"nuk kam provuar t\u00eb nxjerr asnj\u00eb dob\u00ebsi nga objekti\". Dhe p\u00ebrfundimisht \u2013 \", por guxoj t\u00eb them se aty nuk ka dobi\".<\/p>\n
Prandaj, pajtohuni, \"nuk mund t\u00eb nxirrja dobi\" ting\u00ebllon ndryshe nga \"k\u00ebtu nuk ka dobi\". Duket se nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ashtu kaq absolute, tendencioze dhe vet\u00ebbesuese. Por thelbi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb.<\/p>\n
E r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme \u00ebsht\u00eb se ndryshon radikalisht tema e bised\u00ebs, fillimi aktiv, qendra e gjetjes dhe marrjes s\u00eb dobis\u00eb. Tani nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb objekt, por subjekt. Njeriu tashm\u00eb nuk flet p\u00ebr objektin, por p\u00ebr veten e tij dhe aft\u00ebsin\u00eb e tij p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi.<\/p>\n
Dikush e bleu nj\u00eb smartphone. Dedi k\u00ebrkoi, provoi ta p\u00ebrdor\u00eb, ashtu, dhe me at\u00eb \u2013 pa sukses.
N\u00eb rastin e dyt\u00eb thot\u00eb: dreq, nj\u00eb gj\u00eb e till\u00eb, dhe un\u00eb nuk kam mendje t'i shfryt\u00ebzoj, m\u00eb vjen keq deri n\u00eb pik\u00ebn e lot\u00ebve. Tani \u00e7far\u00eb ndjenjash ka? A ka d\u00ebshir\u00eb t'i ndihmoj\u00eb? E \u00e7far\u00eb mendoni p\u00ebr smartphone-in?<\/p>\n
Un\u00eb prej koh\u00ebsh, p\u00ebr \u00e7do rast, p\u00ebrpiqem t\u00eb mos shkruaj komente si \u00abky \u00ebsht\u00eb material i padobish\u00ebm\u00bb. Q\u00ebllimi, mund t\u00eb thuhet, \u00ebsht\u00eb mercenar - ndoshta ndokush mendon p\u00ebr dobin\u00eb ashtu si un\u00eb. At\u00ebher\u00eb, ai do ta lexoj\u00eb komentarim tim si \u00abun\u00eb jam idiot, i paaft\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb kuptuar materialin dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi prej tij\u00bb. Edhe ashtu, shum\u00eb njer\u00ebz m\u00eb konsiderojn\u00eb si idiot, nuk dua ta p\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsoj.<\/p>\n
Por, si\u00e7 e kuptuat, kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb gjith\u00e7ka.<\/p>\n
Vendi i dobis\u00eb<\/h4>\n \nM\u00eb lart kam p\u00ebrdorur, n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi, definita mjaft primitive t\u00eb dobis\u00eb dhe vendndodhjes s\u00eb saj. Kam th\u00ebn\u00eb se dobia \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb objekt, dhe subjekti nuk mund ta nxjerr\u00eb at\u00eb.
\u00c7do sistem p\u00ebrb\u00ebhet nga objekte, pronat e tyre dhe lidhjet. N\u00eb rastin ton\u00eb, sistemi \u00ebsht\u00eb i thjesht\u00eb - objekti dhe subjekti me pronat e tyre, dhe lidhja midis tyre. Lidhja lind kur studioni objektin dhe vazhdon t\u00eb ekzistoj\u00eb nj\u00ebfar\u00eb kohe. Sa do t\u00eb zgjas\u00eb - varet nga ju (memoria, interesi p\u00ebr materialin etj.), teknikat e vendosjes s\u00eb objektit n\u00eb hap\u00ebsir\u00eb (k\u00ebmb\u00ebngulje p\u00ebr komentet e reja etj.).<\/p>\n
Pra, ku \u00ebsht\u00eb dobia? N\u00ebse besojm\u00eb se \u00e7far\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb shkruar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb artikull, at\u00ebher\u00eb nxjerrim nj\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb thjesht\u00eb: dobia \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb pron\u00eb e objektit. Nj\u00eb pron\u00eb statike, me nj\u00eb vler\u00eb t\u00eb caktuar. Por n\u00ebse prona \u00ebsht\u00eb statike, at\u00ebher\u00eb ajo nuk varet nga subjekti, apo jo? P\u00ebr shembull, kjo artikull ka dobi - 100 nj\u00ebsi, \u00e7far\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb kjo.<\/p>\n
At\u00ebher\u00eb merremi me tez\u00ebn ton\u00eb t\u00eb dyt\u00eb: dobin\u00eb nga objekti duhet ta nxjerr\u00eb, dhe aft\u00ebsia p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb nxjerrje i takon subjektit, jo objektit. K\u00ebshtu, aft\u00ebsia p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi - \u00ebsht\u00eb pron\u00eb e subjektit. Ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb k\u00ebshtu?<\/p>\n
Por, duket se kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb shpjegim i plot\u00eb. M\u00eb lart ne diskutonim se si mund t\u00eb lexosh nj\u00eb artikull, dhe sa rezultat t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm mund t\u00eb marr\u00ebsh. K\u00ebshtu, i nj\u00ebjti subjekt mund, var\u00ebsisht nga gjendja e tij t\u00eb brendshme, t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb nj\u00eb sasi t\u00eb ndryshme dobie nga objekti. Ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb?<\/p>\n
K\u00ebtu ka dy mund\u00ebsi. Ose ne ndalojm\u00eb s\u00eb konsideruari subjektin si statik, duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb atij, si n\u00eb reakt, props dhe state, ose e transferojm\u00eb paragrafin\u00eb e m\u00ebparshme nga subjekti n\u00eb lidhje. Le t\u00eb ket\u00eb edhe pronat e lidhjes. K\u00ebshtu, duket m\u00eb logjike.<\/p>\n
Lidhja \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00ebnyra e studimit t\u00eb objektit t\u00eb caktuar, karakteristikat e k\u00ebsaj m\u00ebnyre, p\u00ebrpjekjet e p\u00ebrdorura etj. Nga cil\u00ebsia e lidhjes varet sasia e dobis\u00eb q\u00eb do t\u00eb nxirrni nga objekti.<\/p>\n
Dhe tani b\u00ebjm\u00eb nj\u00eb hap n\u00eb an\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrpiqemi t\u00eb kuptojm\u00eb at\u00eb q\u00eb nuk p\u00ebrputhet me k\u00ebt\u00eb model. Le t\u00eb kujtojm\u00eb filmin \u00abLojra mendore\u00bb, i bazuar n\u00eb ngjarje reale. Kush nuk e mban mend, do t'ju tregoj nj\u00eb sken\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Heroi kryesor i filmit - John Nash, nj\u00eb shkenc\u00ebtar i ardhsh\u00ebm, ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb - nj\u00eb student i doktorat\u00ebs n\u00eb Princeton. Po p\u00ebrpiqet t\u00eb sajoj\u00eb nj\u00eb teori ekuilibri, por nuk po ia del. Vjen me miqt\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb bar, dhe aty vijn\u00eb edhe vajzat - nj\u00eb e bukur dhe disa t\u00eb bukura. Miqt\u00eb fillojn\u00eb t\u00eb diskutojn\u00eb se kush do t\u00eb p\u00ebrkujdeset p\u00ebr t\u00eb bukur\u00ebn, duke p\u00ebrmendur m\u00ebsimet e Adam Smith-it p\u00ebr konkurrenc\u00ebn, si motorin e tregtis\u00eb.<\/p>\n
John ka nj\u00eb mbushje. N\u00ebse t\u00eb gjith\u00eb do t\u00eb shkonin tek e bukura, ata do t\u00eb pengonin nj\u00ebri-tjetrin dhe ajo nuk do t'i takonte askujt. Dhe vajzat e bukura do t\u00eb l\u00ebndoheshin dhe do t\u00eb iknin. Djemt\u00eb do t\u00eb mbeteshin pa vajza. N\u00ebse t\u00eb gjith\u00eb do t\u00eb shkonin tek vajzat e bukura, duke e injoruar t\u00eb bukur\u00ebn, at\u00ebher\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb do t\u00eb fitonin. T\u00eb gjith\u00eb djemt\u00eb do t\u00eb kishin vajza, askush nuk do t\u00eb l\u00ebndohej. Po, ndoshta, e bukura do t\u00eb l\u00ebndohej.<\/p>\n
Pas k\u00ebsaj konkludimi, John ngrihet, fal\u00ebnderon t\u00eb bukur\u00ebn dhe ik\u00ebn. E bukura, natyrisht, nuk ka asnj\u00eb ide p\u00ebrse u fal\u00ebnderua. Kjo situat\u00eb, n\u00ebse besoni filmin, ndihmoi John-in t\u00eb p\u00ebrparoj\u00eb nga pika e tij e ngjashme dhe t\u00eb p\u00ebrfundoj\u00eb teorin\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn m\u00eb von\u00eb mori \u00c7mimin Nobel.<\/p>\n
K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb, le t\u00eb kthehemi n\u00eb modelin ton\u00eb. Subjekti \u00ebsht\u00eb i qart\u00eb - ai \u00ebsht\u00eb John. Objekti \u00ebsht\u00eb i qart\u00eb - vajzat, djemt\u00eb dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi - nj\u00eb detyr\u00eb e caktuar. Lidhja \u00ebsht\u00eb gjithashtu e qart\u00eb - John ishte d\u00ebshmitar dhe thuajse pjes\u00ebmarr\u00ebs n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb situat\u00eb. Dhe e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishmja - dobia q\u00eb John arriti t\u00eb nxirrte \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb.
M\u00eb lart diskutonim se dobia nxirret nga objekti. Por \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb se n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast objekteve nuk i mungonin dobit\u00eb q\u00eb John e nxori. Ti kujtojn\u00eb - ai u p\u00ebrparua nga pika e ngjashme n\u00eb teorin\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn askush nuk dinte nga pjes\u00ebmarr\u00ebsit e situat\u00ebs n\u00eb bar.<\/p>\n
Asnj\u00eb djal\u00eb, asnj\u00eb vajz\u00eb, asnj\u00eb barman, asnj\u00eb shishe nuk e dinte k\u00ebt\u00eb teori dhe pik\u00ebn e vdekjes. K\u00ebto informacione nuk ishin n\u00eb asnj\u00ebr\u00ebn nga pjes\u00ebt e objektit.<\/p>\n
Nj\u00eb pyetje e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb \u2013 a kishte ndonj\u00eb dobi n\u00eb subjekt? N\u00ebse besojm\u00eb teorit\u00eb e ndryshme, truri di p\u00ebrgjigjet p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjitha pyetjet. Por nuk ka mund\u00ebsi t\u00eb verifikohet kjo teori, prandaj propozoj q\u00eb t\u00eb mendojm\u00eb se informatat ndoshta ishin n\u00eb tru, por, ngaq\u00eb nuk u nxor\u00ebn para takimit me objektin, \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb e thjesht\u00eb t\u00eb mendojm\u00eb se ato nuk ishin aty.<\/p>\n
Ndoshta ju vet\u00eb shpesh keni r\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb situat\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb, dhe n\u00eb komentet e mia shpesh shoh di\u00e7ka si \"edhe mua m\u00eb ka marr\u00eb mendja, vet\u00ebm se s'po dija si ta formuloja\", ose \"ah, kjo ishte pik\u00ebrisht ajo ide ky\u00e7e q\u00eb m\u00eb mungonte p\u00ebr t\u00eb ecur p\u00ebrpara, por e dija!\".<\/p>\n
Pra, Joni nuk e nxori dobin\u00eb nga objekti, dhe as nga subjekti. Mbete lidhja. A kishte mund\u00ebsi q\u00eb t\u00eb merrte dobi nga lidhja?<\/p>\n
Ai nuk ishte p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb n\u00eb bar, dhe vajzat vijn\u00eb aty rregullisht, nj\u00ebher\u00eb madje Joni p\u00ebrpiqej t\u00eb fliste me to, por nuk arriti asgj\u00eb. Nj\u00eb lidhje e till\u00eb, pra nj\u00eb situat\u00eb e ngjashme, kishte ndodhur edhe m\u00eb par\u00eb. Ndoshta problemi nuk ishte te lidhja.<\/p>\n
At\u00ebher\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb ishte? Le t\u00eb kthehemi te mendimi sistemor, i cili thot\u00eb \u2013 hey, burra, mos p\u00ebrpiqni t\u00eb gjeni p\u00ebrgjigje duke par\u00eb ve\u00e7mas objektet dhe lidhjet, kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb e dobishme. Ka nj\u00eb gj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr \u2013 pron\u00ebsi emergjente, ose pron\u00ebsi q\u00eb shfaqen. K\u00ebto jan\u00eb pron\u00ebsi q\u00eb shfaqen n\u00eb nj\u00eb sistem t\u00eb angazhuar dhe nuk mund t\u00eb shihen duke par\u00eb objektet dhe lidhjet ve\u00e7mas \u2013 ashtu si\u00e7 e shikuam m\u00eb sip\u00ebr.<\/p>\n
Pron\u00ebsit\u00eb emergjente, n\u00ebse mund t\u00eb thuhet k\u00ebshtu, jan\u00eb pron\u00ebsit\u00eb e sistemit n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi, kur ai funksionon. Sigurisht, n\u00ebse e thellojm\u00eb dhe eksploatojm\u00eb mir\u00eb, do gjejm\u00eb prejardhjen e k\u00ebtyre pron\u00ebsive. Por, me shum\u00eb gjas\u00eb, shkaku i shfaqjes s\u00eb tyre do t\u00eb rezultoj\u00eb kompleks. Do t\u00eb ket\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me pron\u00ebsit\u00eb e objektit, pron\u00ebsit\u00eb e subjektit dhe pron\u00ebsit\u00eb e lidhjeve. Yjet jan\u00eb rreshtuar, me fjal\u00eb t\u00eb tjera.<\/p>\n
Pra, dobia u shfaq nga asgj\u00eb. Dhe kjo ndodh shum\u00eb shpesh.<\/p>\n
Po lexoni nj\u00eb tekst p\u00ebr \u00e7iklist\u00ebt n\u00eb Amsterdam dhe kujtoni se keni harruar t\u00eb merrni n\u00eb pun\u00eb certifikat\u00ebn e pag\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb viz\u00ebn \u2013 d\u00ebshironi t\u00eb shkoni ver\u00ebs n\u00eb plazh, n\u00eb Greqi. N\u00eb tekst nuk kishte as p\u00ebr viz\u00ebn, as p\u00ebr Greqin\u00eb, as p\u00ebr ju, as p\u00ebr detin.<\/p>\n
Po shikoni filmin \"Matrix\" dhe vendosni t\u00eb ndaloni duhanin. N\u00eb \"Matrix\" askush nuk pi duhan. Askush nuk diskuton p\u00ebr dobin\u00eb e nj\u00eb diete t\u00eb sh\u00ebndetshme \u2013 p\u00ebrkundrazi, her\u00eb pas here han\u00eb biskota.<\/p>\n
Un\u00eb, s\u00eb bashku me vajz\u00ebn time, po d\u00ebgjoj n\u00eb makin\u00eb audiokranin \"Neznaika n\u00eb qytetin diellor\", dhe m\u00eb arrin n\u00eb mendje pse shefi i departamentit, ku po zbatoj ndryshime, \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht i rezistenc\u00ebs. N\u00eb Neznaika nuk kishte asnj\u00eb informacion p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Po d\u00ebgjoj n\u00eb rrug\u00eb p\u00ebr n\u00eb pun\u00eb k\u00ebng\u00ebn e Metallica \"Ronnie Rising Medley\" (nga albumi homenaje \"This is your Life\", dedikuar Ronnie James Dio) dhe vendos t\u00eb jap\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjen nga puna. \u00c7far\u00eb k\u00ebndojn\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebng\u00eb \u2013 nuk kam iden\u00eb, sepse nuk di anglisht.<\/p>\n
E kuptoni, n\u00eb secilin nga shembujt, po t\u00eb shqyrtojm\u00eb me kujdes, mund t\u00eb ndjekim nj\u00eb zinxhir arsyetimesh dhe t\u00eb kuptojm\u00eb se si informacioni fillestar ka \u00e7uar n\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, vendim ose veprim. Pra, n\u00eb dobi. Ju mund ta b\u00ebni k\u00ebt\u00eb, n\u00ebse jeni \u2013 subjekt.<\/p>\n
Pik\u00ebrisht ashtu, mund t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtosh k\u00ebt\u00eb zinxhir n\u00eb \u00e7do sistem ku ka ndodhur marrja e dobis\u00eb. Ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb interesante, p\u00ebr arg\u00ebtim, por nuk do t\u00eb jet\u00eb e mundur ta b\u00ebsh k\u00ebt\u00eb vazhdimisht. Ka shum\u00eb situata t\u00eb tilla q\u00eb ndodhin \u00e7do dit\u00eb, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb ato \u2013 t\u00eb pavet\u00ebdijshme. Edhe p\u00ebr ju.<\/p>\n
Por m\u00eb e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishmja \u2013 zinxhiri do t\u00eb jet\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb i ndrysh\u00ebm. Ky zinxhir \u00ebsht\u00eb pron\u00ebsia emergjente. Unike, e shfaqur nj\u00eb her\u00eb, nj\u00eb mrekulli e padashur. Sot objekti ju b\u00ebn t\u00eb ndiheni, vendosni, mendoni, ndri\u00e7oni, nd\u00ebrsa pas nj\u00eb viti \u2013 asgj\u00eb, ose krejt e kund\u00ebrta.<\/p>\n
Prandaj, propozoj t\u00eb mos k\u00ebrkoni lidhje shkak-pasoj\u00eb shum\u00eb shpesh dhe me insistim. M\u00eb mir\u00eb pranojeni dhe p\u00ebrdorni faktin: dobia mund t\u00eb shfaqet kudo, n\u00eb \u00e7do koh\u00eb, dhe n\u00eb \u00e7do kombinim.<\/p>\n
Dobia nuk ekziston n\u00eb artikuj, libra, filma, mjete, metoda, kompani, miq, organizata, komunitete, rrjete sociale. Dobia nuk q\u00ebndron n\u00eb ju. Dobia nuk q\u00ebndron n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn dhe sjelljen me t\u00eb cilat lexoni artikuj dhe libra, shikoni filma, p\u00ebrdorni mjete dhe metoda, kaloni koh\u00eb me miqt\u00eb dhe n\u00eb kompani, punoni n\u00eb organizata, merrni pjes\u00eb n\u00eb komunitete dhe rrjete sociale.<\/p>\n
Dobia n\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb nuk q\u00ebndron askund. Dobia shfaqet, kur objekti, subjekti dhe nd\u00ebrmjet tyre krijohet nj\u00eb lidhje.<\/p>\n
Duket disi budallall\u00ebk dhe naiv, a nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb? P.sh., dobia \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb mrekulli, mana nga qielli, q\u00eb u zbret, si Nj\u00eb Paj\u00eb e Blert\u00eb, n\u00eb nj\u00eb situat\u00eb t\u00eb paparashikuar? \u00c7far\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb tani? T\u00eb studiojm\u00eb dhe t\u00eb presim? \u00c7far\u00eb lloj marr\u00ebzie \u00ebsht\u00eb kjo me k\u00ebto sisteme?<\/p>\n
Jo, pik\u00ebrisht kuptimi i p\u00ebrfitimit p\u00ebrmes sistemeve lejon p\u00ebrcaktimin e akcentit dhe gjetjen e mekanizmave. Mos harroni, se t\u00eb menduarit sistemor nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm analiz\u00eb (p\u00ebrse ndodhi k\u00ebshtu?), por edhe ndryshimi i sistemeve. N\u00ebse sistemi i p\u00ebrfitimit nuk funksionon, duhet t\u00eb ndryshohet.<\/p>\n
K\u00ebt\u00eb do ta b\u00ebjm\u00eb her\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr. Gjithashtu do t\u00eb flasim p\u00ebr faktin se nuk ka asnj\u00eb p\u00ebrfitim n\u00eb p\u00ebrfitim. Ndoshta do t\u00eb flasim p\u00ebr Bruce Lee.habr.com<\/a><\/p>","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\u042d\u0442\u043e \u2013 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u0430\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0437\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u044f \u0438\u0437 \u0432\u0441\u0435\u0445, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u044b \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438. \u041f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043e\u043d\u0430 \u043e \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0435 \u0438 \u0435\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438. \u041d\u0430 \u0435\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u0435\u043d\u044f \u043d\u0430\u0442\u043e\u043b\u043a\u043d\u0443\u043b\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0441 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u043c \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c \u043e\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0438\u0437 \u043f\u043b\u043e\u0449\u0430\u0434\u043e\u043a, \u0433\u0434\u0435 \u044f \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0443\u044e\u0441\u044c. \u0410 \u0434\u043e \u043d\u0435\u0435 \u2013 \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0436\u0434\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0439, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0439 \u0432\u044b \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043a \u043c\u043e\u0438\u043c \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u044f\u043c. \u0410 \u043c\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u043e\u043c \u2013 \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0438 \u0432\u0441\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u044f \u0432\u0438\u0436\u0443 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[702],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-novosti-interneta"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t