<\/a><\/noindex>Tani e keni lexuar k\u00ebt\u00eb dhe mendoni - ah, k\u00ebt\u00eb e di. Provoni ta mbani mend k\u00ebt\u00eb her\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr kur t\u00eb shkruani nj\u00eb koment si 'nuk ka asgj\u00eb t\u00eb dobishme k\u00ebtu', ose kur t\u00eb diskutoni me dik\u00eb p\u00ebr dobin\u00eb e di\u00e7kaje, ose madje t\u00eb mendoni p\u00ebr dobin\u00eb n\u00eb vetmi. Ju siguroj, \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb t\u00eb mbani mend subjektivitetin e dobis\u00eb. Gjithmon\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb m\u00eb e leht\u00eb t\u00eb shikoni dobin\u00eb si nj\u00eb pron\u00eb objektive t\u00eb objektit t\u00eb studimit - artikullit, librit, filmit, mjetit etj.<\/p>\n
Tani nuk po ju p\u00ebrplas me ju - p\u00ebr mua \u00ebsht\u00eb po aq e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb n\u00eb momentin e duhur t\u00eb mbaj mend subjektivitetin, relativitetin e dobis\u00eb. Ne jemi n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn bark\u00eb, dhe aty jemi rreth 7 miliard\u00eb.<\/p>\n
\u00c7far\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb 'subjektivitet'? \u00cbsht\u00eb e thjesht\u00eb. Ka nj\u00eb objekt - artikull, lib\u00ebr, film, mjet, metod\u00eb etj. Ka nj\u00eb subjekt - ju, apo un\u00eb, ose Gena, ose moderatorin e mrekulluesh\u00ebm t\u00eb nj\u00eb platforme. Dhe ky objekt me subjektin u takuan - Gena e lexoi artikullin. Dhe nxjerr nj\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebrfundimi tradicional i mesatares Gena \u00ebsht\u00eb - n\u00eb objekt nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi. T\u00eb l\u00ebm\u00eb m\u00ebnjan\u00eb rastet kur Gena nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb adekuat - le t\u00eb jet\u00eb ai nj\u00eb njeri krejt\u00ebsisht i pranuesh\u00ebm, nj\u00eb subjekt i kualitetit. \u00c7far\u00eb i mungon fraz\u00ebs 'n\u00eb objekt nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi'?<\/p>\n
Duke u bazuar n\u00eb subjektivizmin e dobis\u00eb, i mungojn\u00eb dy fjal\u00eb - 'p\u00ebr mua'. N\u00eb objekt nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi p\u00ebr mua. Tani ting\u00ebllon ndryshe, apo jo? Sepse p\u00ebrve\u00e7 Gen\u00ebs, artikullin e lexon Vasia, Serjozha dhe Vika. Le t\u00eb themi se Vika thot\u00eb ndryshe - 'n\u00eb objekt ka dobi p\u00ebr mua'.<\/p>\n
N\u00ebse ndodhin ndodhi t\u00eb \u00e7uditshme, dhe fatkeq\u00ebsisht takohen n\u00eb komentet rreth objektit, at\u00ebher\u00eb mund t\u00eb fluturojn\u00eb shk\u00ebndija, t\u00eb kuqen minuset dhe t\u00eb kalojn\u00eb n\u00eb person. Mjafton, kur shprehim mendimin ton\u00eb, t\u00eb sqarojm\u00eb se ka dobi apo nuk ka \"p\u00ebr mua\", q\u00eb ashtu duket se nuk do t\u00eb ket\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb t\u00eb diskutohet. Dhe verdikti p\u00ebrfundimtar - ka dobi apo jo - thjesht nuk do t\u00eb vij\u00eb, sepse nuk do t\u00eb ket\u00eb kuptim.<\/p>\n
Natyrisht, dikush do t\u00eb shkruaj\u00eb se nuk ka dobi, por t\u00eb gjith\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt menj\u00ebher\u00eb do ta kuptojn\u00eb - personi thjesht po t\u00ebrheq v\u00ebmendjen. Sepse tani \u00ebsht\u00eb fjala p\u00ebr t\u00eb prishur humorin e autorit, si\u00e7 ndodhte zakonisht. Nj\u00eb person, n\u00ebse i shikon gj\u00ebrat si\u00e7 jan\u00eb, po i hedh balt\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb t\u00eb pranishm\u00ebve. N\u00ebse e thjeshtojm\u00eb, ai thot\u00eb: \"ju t\u00eb gjith\u00ebve jeni gabim\".<\/p>\n
P\u00ebrve\u00e7 k\u00ebsaj, ka nj\u00eb kontradikt\u00eb t\u00eb dukshme. Nj\u00ebri thot\u00eb - \"kam gjetur dobi k\u00ebtu p\u00ebr vete\". Kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se ka dobi. Tjetri thot\u00eb - \"k\u00ebtu nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi\". Kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se i pari, q\u00eb ka gjetur dobi, \u00ebsht\u00eb gabim.<\/p>\n
Por \u00e7far\u00eb thot\u00eb autori? Ky djal\u00eb nuk ka asnj\u00eb rol. N\u00ebse e shohim dobin\u00eb si nj\u00eb fenomen subjektiv, at\u00ebher\u00eb autori nuk merr pjes\u00eb fare n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb ekuacion. Po, ai krijoi objektin. Por kur subjekti ka ardhur, autori nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb af\u00ebr.<\/p>\n
Natyrisht, ai mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrpiqet t\u00eb arrij\u00eb per\u00ebndimin e diellit, duke ofruar shpjegime shtes\u00eb n\u00eb komente, por kjo, sipas mendimit tim, \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb pozicion i gabuar - autori kurr\u00eb nuk do t\u00eb m\u00ebsoj\u00eb t\u00eb shkruaj\u00eb tekste t\u00eb mira, n\u00ebse n\u00eb subconscious-in e tij ka mendimin \"ah, mir\u00eb, m\u00eb von\u00eb do t\u00eb shpjegoj n\u00eb komente, n\u00ebse \u00ebsht\u00eb e nevojshme\". Por kjo vlen vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr artikuj. P\u00ebr librat - n\u00eb nj\u00eb shkall\u00eb shum\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb vog\u00ebl, pasi ata redaktohen. N\u00eb projektet e zbatimit, t\u00eb cilat gjithashtu jan\u00eb objekte p\u00ebr nxjerrjen e dobis\u00eb, autori \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb an\u00eb me subjektin p\u00ebr muaj t\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00eb, duke i ndihmuar atij t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb p\u00ebrfitim.<\/p>\n
Pra, her\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr kur do t\u00eb diskutoni ose shkruani p\u00ebr dobin\u00eb e di\u00e7kaje, provojeni t\u00eb shtoni dy fjal\u00ebt magjike: nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi n\u00eb objekt p\u00ebr mua.<\/p>\n
Por edhe kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e gjitha e v\u00ebrteta. A ju shqet\u00ebson fjala \"nuk ka\" n\u00eb fraz\u00ebn \"n\u00eb objekt nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi\"? Ndoshta, Gena u nxituar?<\/p>\n
Nxjerrja<\/h4>\n \nKa nj\u00eb fraz\u00eb t\u00eb zakonshme - t\u00eb nxjerrim dobi. Aq e zakonshme saq\u00eb kuptimi i saj tashm\u00eb nuk perceptohet. Tani ndaloni dhe mendoni p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb fraz\u00eb dhe at\u00eb q\u00eb q\u00ebndron pas saj.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr shembull, lexuat nj\u00eb artikull. E dini vet\u00eb se si mund t\u00eb lexoni ndryshe. Mund t\u00eb lexoni shpejt, n\u00ebp\u00ebr diagonale, duke v\u00ebn\u00eb re vet\u00ebm shprehjet e karakterizuara. Mund t\u00eb lexoni duke menduar vazhdimisht p\u00ebr di\u00e7ka tjet\u00ebr dhe t\u00eb mos kuptoni kuptimin e asaj q\u00eb lexoni. Mund t\u00eb lexoni duke i kushtuar v\u00ebmendje vet\u00ebm korrekt\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb autorit. Mund t\u00eb lexoni vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjetur di\u00e7ka p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn mund t\u00eb komentoni. Mund t\u00eb lexoni me v\u00ebmendje, duke analizuar \u00e7do shembull dhe p\u00ebrfundim. Mund ta printoni dhe ta lexoni me nj\u00eb laps, duke b\u00ebr\u00eb sh\u00ebnime n\u00eb an\u00eb dhe duke nxjerr\u00eb n\u00eb pah at\u00eb q\u00eb ju duket interesante. Pas leximit, mund t\u00eb shkruani ve\u00e7mas nj\u00eb p\u00ebrmbledhje, duke theksuar kuptimin kryesor t\u00eb artikullit. Etj.<\/p>\n
Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb diferenca? N\u00eb q\u00ebllime dhe p\u00ebrpjekje. Nuk do t\u00eb flas tani p\u00ebr q\u00ebllimet, ato nuk i p\u00ebrkasin tem\u00ebs s\u00eb artikullit. Le t\u00eb supozojm\u00eb se lexuesi yn\u00eb, subjekti, ka nj\u00eb q\u00ebllim t\u00eb till\u00eb \u2013 t\u00eb marr\u00eb dobi.
Ka nj\u00eb shprehje t\u00eb zakonshme \u2013 \u2018t\u00eb shpjegosh dhe ta fus\u00ebsh n\u00eb goj\u00eb\u2019. N\u00ebse e vazhdojm\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb analogji, ju jeni trupi juaj, nd\u00ebrsa objekti nga i cili duhet t\u00eb nxirrni dobi \u00ebsht\u00eb ushqimi q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb vendosur n\u00eb ju. Detyra juaj \u00ebsht\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm ta kaloni objektin n\u00ebp\u00ebr vete, por t\u00eb merrni maksimumin \u2013 proteina, yndyra, karbohidrate, vitamina, mikroelemente etj.<\/p>\n
Nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e k\u00ebsaj pune do t\u00eb kryhet vetvetiu \u2013 p\u00ebr shembull, fal\u00eb mikroflor\u00ebs intestinale. Por pjesa m\u00eb e madhe e pun\u00ebs do t\u00eb duhet ta b\u00ebni ju. Fillimisht do t\u00eb punoni me dh\u00ebmb\u00ebt, gjuh\u00ebn dhe gj\u00ebndrat e p\u00ebshtym\u00ebs. M\u00eb pas, ezofagu do t\u00eb ket\u00eb pak mundim. Pastaj, stomaku do t\u00eb kaloj\u00eb disa or\u00eb duke l\u00ebvizur k\u00ebt\u00eb p\u00ebrzierje nga muri n\u00eb mur, duke kryer nj\u00eb trajtim kimik t\u00eb ushqimit me l\u00ebngun e stomakut. M\u00eb pas do t\u00eb fillojn\u00eb disa departamente t\u00eb zorr\u00ebve, secila prej t\u00eb cil\u00ebve do t\u00eb kryej\u00eb funksionin e vet, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb fizik \u2013 t\u00eb shtyj\u00eb ushqimin m\u00eb tutje. Dhe, p\u00ebrfundimisht, do t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb katarsisi.<\/p>\n
\u00c7do gj\u00eb q\u00eb organi b\u00ebn me ushqimin \u00ebsht\u00eb nxjerrja e dobis\u00eb. Po, ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb ndodh q\u00eb dobi e vetme nga puna e organizmit \u00ebsht\u00eb nxjerrja e saj sa m\u00eb shpejt nga trupi \u2013 ndodhin edhe k\u00ebto ushqime. Por, n\u00eb shumic\u00ebn e rasteve, p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb punoni.<\/p>\n
Tani tani parafyshni nj\u00eb pamje se ju, si trupi i njeriut, keni ndaluar t\u00eb b\u00ebni p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi. Keni filluar duke ndaluar t\u00eb kafshoni dhe gllab\u00ebroni \u2013 si njer\u00ebzit q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb koma ose ata q\u00eb vendosin me vet\u00ebdije t\u00eb vdesin nga uria. \u00c7far\u00eb do t\u00eb ndodhte m\u00eb pas?<\/p>\n
Varet nga ambienti juaj. N\u00ebse ka njer\u00ebz q\u00eb duan t'ju ndihmojn\u00eb, ata do t'ju vendosin ose nj\u00eb tub p\u00ebr ushqim n\u00eb zgavr\u00ebn tuaj ose do t'ju ushqejn\u00eb me dhun\u00eb. Pra, ata do ta b\u00ebjn\u00eb objektin m\u00eb t\u00eb thjesht\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi. Dhe k\u00ebt\u00eb do ta b\u00ebjn\u00eb p\u00ebr ju, sepse ky objekt nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb \u2018n\u00eb goj\u00ebn tuaj\u2019. Po ashtu, p\u00ebr mua, for example, artikujt n\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn kineze nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb \u2018n\u00eb goj\u00ebn\u2019 time, pavar\u00ebsisht se \u00e7far\u00eb dobie mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb atje \u2013 un\u00eb thjesht nuk mund t\u00eb filloj t\u00eb nxjerr dobi.<\/p>\n
N\u00ebse, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 ndales\u00ebs s\u00eb kafshimit t\u00eb ushqimit, trupi juaj ndalon gjithashtu dhe hapat e tjer\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrpunimit t\u00eb saj, at\u00ebher\u00eb \u2013 p\u00ebrfundimisht. N\u00eb libra, n\u00eb fakt, thuhet se zorr\u00ebt do t\u00eb vazhdojn\u00eb t\u00eb funksionojn\u00eb, pasi ato kan\u00eb nj\u00eb sistem nervor t\u00eb vetin, por kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb e pak\u00ebt.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi nga ushqimi, trupi b\u00ebn p\u00ebrpjekje t\u00eb m\u00ebdha. Pa k\u00ebto, asnj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb. Ne thjesht jemi m\u00ebsuar me k\u00ebt\u00eb dhe nuk e perceptojm\u00eb k\u00ebto p\u00ebrpjekje si p\u00ebrpjekje.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi nga objektet e tjera, p\u00ebrpjekjet do t'ju nevojiten ju. Pra, keni zgjedhje, n\u00eb ndryshim nga trupi juaj, por formula mbetet e nj\u00ebjt\u00eb: d\u00ebshiron dobi \u2013 b\u00ebj p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr ta nxjerr\u00eb at\u00eb.<\/p>\n
T\u00eb kthehemi n\u00eb fundin e seksionit t\u00eb kaluar: \u2018n\u00eb objekt nuk ka asnj\u00eb dobi\u2019. Tani, duke e kuptuar se p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi nevojitet p\u00ebrpjekja e subjektit, mund t\u00eb modifikojm\u00eb fraz\u00ebn: \u2018un\u00eb nuk kam qen\u00eb n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb nxjerr ndonj\u00eb dobi nga objekti\u2019. Megjithat\u00eb, kjo ting\u00ebllon ende but\u00eb. N\u00eb shumic\u00ebn e rasteve, ting\u00ebllon k\u00ebshtu: \u2018un\u00eb nuk kam provuar t\u00eb nxjerr ndonj\u00eb dobi nga objekti\u2019. Dhe p\u00ebr ta p\u00ebrmbyllur \u2013 \u2018, por guxoj t\u00eb them se atje nuk ka dobi\u2019.<\/p>\n
Mund t\u00eb pajtohemi se \u2018un\u00eb nuk kam arritur t\u00eb nxjerr dobi\u2019 ting\u00ebllon ndryshe nga \u2018k\u00ebtu nuk ka dobi\u2019. Duket, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb aq absolut, tendencioz dhe i sigurt. Por thelbi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb k\u00ebtu.<\/p>\n
E r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishmja \u2013 tem\u00eb e bised\u00ebs ndryshon radikalisht, fillimi aktiv, qendra e gjetjes dhe marrjes s\u00eb dobis\u00eb. Tani, kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb objekt, por subjekt. Njeriu tashm\u00eb nuk flet p\u00ebr objektin, por p\u00ebr veten e tij dhe aft\u00ebsin\u00eb e tij p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr shkak se. Nj\u00eb gjysh bleu nj\u00eb smartphone. Ai e shikoi gjyshi, e preku, k\u00ebshtu dhe ashtu \u2013 asnj\u00eb rezultat.
N\u00eb rastin e dyt\u00eb thot\u00eb: o Zot, nj\u00eb gj\u00eb kaq e shk\u00eblqyer, e un\u00eb nuk kam mendje p\u00ebr ta p\u00ebrdorur, m\u00eb vjen keq deri n\u00eb lot. Tani \u00e7far\u00eb ndjenjash? A d\u00ebshiron t'i ndihmosh atij? E \u00e7far\u00eb mendimi ke p\u00ebr smartphone-in?<\/p>\n
Prej disa koh\u00ebsh, n\u00eb \u00e7do rast, p\u00ebrpiqem t\u00eb mos shkruaj komente si \"kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb material i padobish\u00ebm\". Q\u00ebllimi, mund t\u00eb them, \u00ebsht\u00eb mercenar - ndoshta dikush mendon p\u00ebr dobin\u00eb po ashtu si un\u00eb. At\u00ebher\u00eb ai do ta lexoj\u00eb komentin tim, si \"un\u00eb jam nj\u00eb idiot, q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb kuptoj\u00eb materialin dhe t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi prej tij\". Edhe ashtu shum\u00eb njer\u00ebz m\u00eb konsiderojn\u00eb idiot, nuk dua ta p\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsoj.<\/p>\n
Por, si\u00e7 e kuptuat, kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e gjitha.<\/p>\n
Vendi i dobis\u00eb<\/h4>\n \nM\u00eb sip\u00ebr kam p\u00ebrdorur, n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi, definita mjaft primitive t\u00eb dobis\u00eb dhe vendit t\u00eb saj. Kam th\u00ebn\u00eb se dobi ka n\u00eb objekt, nd\u00ebrsa subjekti nuk mund ta nxjerr\u00eb at\u00eb.
\u00c7do sistem p\u00ebrb\u00ebhet nga objekte, vetit\u00eb e tyre dhe lidhjet. N\u00eb rastin ton\u00eb sistemi \u00ebsht\u00eb i thjesht\u00eb - objekti dhe subjekti me ve\u00e7orit\u00eb e tyre, dhe lidhja midis tyre. Lidhja lind kur ju studioni objektin, dhe vazhdon t\u00eb jetoj\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb koh\u00eb. Sa koh\u00eb - varet nga ju (memoria, interesi p\u00ebr materialin etj.), teknikat e vendosjes s\u00eb objektit n\u00eb hap\u00ebsir\u00eb (kujtesat p\u00ebr komentet e reja etj.).<\/p>\n
Pra, ku \u00ebsht\u00eb dobi? N\u00ebse besojm\u00eb at\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb shkruar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb artikull, at\u00ebher\u00eb del nj\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim i thjesht\u00eb: dobi \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb ve\u00e7ori e objektit. Nj\u00eb ve\u00e7ori statike, me nj\u00ebfar\u00eb vler\u00eb. Por n\u00ebse ve\u00e7oria \u00ebsht\u00eb statike, at\u00ebher\u00eb ajo nuk varet nga subjekti, apo jo? P\u00ebr shembull, p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb artikull dobia \u00ebsht\u00eb 100 nj\u00ebsi, \u00e7far\u00ebdo q\u00eb t\u00eb dobi.<\/p>\n
At\u00ebher\u00eb marrim tez\u00ebn ton\u00eb t\u00eb dyt\u00eb: dobin\u00eb nga objekti duhet ta nxjerrim, dhe aft\u00ebsia p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb nxjerrje lidhet me subjektin, jo me objektin. K\u00ebshtu, duket se aft\u00ebsia p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb dobi - \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb ve\u00e7ori e subjektit. Ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb, apo jo?<\/p>\n
Por, duket se kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb shpjegim i plot\u00eb. M\u00eb sip\u00ebr ne diskutuam se si mund t\u00eb lexohet nj\u00eb artikull, dhe deri n\u00eb sa e ndrysh\u00ebm rezultat mund t\u00eb merret. K\u00ebshtu, i nj\u00ebjti subjekt mund, n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb gjendjes s\u00eb tij t\u00eb brendshme, t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb sasi t\u00eb ndryshme dobie nga objekti. Ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb, apo jo?<\/p>\n
K\u00ebtu ka dy mund\u00ebsi. Ose ne ndalemi s\u00eb menduari subjektin si statik, duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb atij, si n\u00eb React, props dhe state, ose ne transferojm\u00eb paragrafin e m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm nga subjekti te lidhja. Le t\u00eb ket\u00eb gjithashtu atributet e veta te lidhja. K\u00ebshtu, duket m\u00eb logjike.<\/p>\n
Lidhja \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00ebnyra se si ju studioni nj\u00eb objekt t\u00eb caktuar, karakteristikat e k\u00ebsaj m\u00ebnyre, p\u00ebrpjekjet e p\u00ebrkushtuara etj. Nga cil\u00ebsia e lidhjes varet sasia e dobis\u00eb q\u00eb do nxirrni nga objekti.<\/p>\n
Tani, b\u00ebjm\u00eb nj\u00eb hap n\u00eb an\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrpiqemi t\u00eb kuptojm\u00eb at\u00eb q\u00eb nuk p\u00ebrputhet me k\u00ebt\u00eb model. Le ta kujtojm\u00eb filmin \"Loj\u00ebrat e Mendjes\", q\u00eb duket se \u00ebsht\u00eb i bazuar n\u00eb ngjarje reale. P\u00ebr ata q\u00eb nuk e kujtojn\u00eb, do t\u00eb tregoj nj\u00eb sken\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Personazhi kryesor i filmit \u00ebsht\u00eb John Nash, nj\u00eb shkenc\u00ebtar n\u00eb t\u00eb ardhmen, por p\u00ebr momentin \u2013 nj\u00eb doktorant n\u00eb Princeton. Ai p\u00ebrpiqet t\u00eb krijoj\u00eb nj\u00eb teori t\u00eb barazis\u00eb, por nuk arrin dot. Shkon me miqt\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb bar, ku po ashtu vijn\u00eb vajzat \u2013 nj\u00eb e bukur dhe disa t\u00eb tjera simpatike. Miqt\u00eb fillojn\u00eb t\u00eb debatojn\u00eb se kush do ta ndjek\u00eb t\u00eb bukur\u00ebn, duke kujtuar m\u00ebsimet e Adam Smith p\u00ebr konkurrenc\u00ebn si motor t\u00eb tregtis\u00eb.<\/p>\n
John-it i vjen nj\u00eb ndri\u00e7im. N\u00ebse t\u00eb gjith\u00eb kan\u00eb me nxitim p\u00ebr t\u00eb bukur\u00ebn, ata do e pengojn\u00eb nj\u00ebri-tjetrin, dhe ajo nuk do shkoj\u00eb tek askush. Dhe vajzat simpatike do t\u00eb ofendohen dhe do t\u00eb largohen. Djemt\u00eb do mbeten pa vajza. Por, n\u00ebse t\u00eb gjith\u00eb shkojn\u00eb tek vajzat simpatike, duke e injoruar t\u00eb bukur\u00ebn, t\u00eb gjith\u00eb do t\u00eb fitojn\u00eb. T\u00eb gjith\u00eb djemt\u00eb do t\u00eb ken\u00eb vajza, askush nuk do t\u00eb ofendohet. Ndryshe vet\u00ebm t\u00eb bukura do t\u00eb ofendohet.<\/p>\n
Pas k\u00ebtij p\u00ebrfundimi, John-i ngrihet, fal\u00ebnderon t\u00eb bukur\u00ebn dhe ik\u00ebn. E bukura, natyrisht, nuk ka asnj\u00eb ide p\u00ebrse e fal\u00ebnderoi. Kjo situat\u00eb, n\u00ebse besojm\u00eb filmin, i ndihmoi John-it t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatet dhe t\u00eb p\u00ebrfundoj\u00eb teorin\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn m\u00eb von\u00eb fitoi \u00e7mimin Nobel.<\/p>\n
Tani, le t\u00eb kthehemi n\u00eb modelin ton\u00eb. Subjekti \u00ebsht\u00eb i kuptuesh\u00ebm \u2013 \u00ebsht\u00eb John. Objekti \u00ebsht\u00eb i kuptuesh\u00ebm \u2013 vajzat, djemt\u00eb, dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi \u2013 nj\u00eb problem i caktuar. Lidhja gjithashtu \u00ebsht\u00eb e kuptueshme \u2013 John-i ishte d\u00ebshmitar, dhe gati edhe pjes\u00ebmarr\u00ebs n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb situat\u00eb. Dhe e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishmja \u2013 \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb dobi q\u00eb arriti John.
M\u00eb sip\u00ebr ne diskutuam se dobi nxirret nga objekti. Por \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb se n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast objekti nuk kishte dobi, t\u00eb cil\u00ebn John e nxori. P\u00ebr t'ju rikujtuar \u2013 ai arriti t\u00eb l\u00ebvizi nga nj\u00eb pik\u00eb e q\u00ebndrueshme n\u00eb teori, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn nuk dinte askush nga pjes\u00ebmarr\u00ebsit n\u00eb situat\u00ebn n\u00eb bar.<\/p>\n
As none of the guys, girls, the bartender, or the bottles were aware of this theory and deadlock. This information was not present in any part of the object.<\/p>\n
A slippery question \u2013 was there any benefit in the subject? If you believe various theories, the brain knows the answers to all questions. But there is no way to verify this theory, so let\u2019s assume that there was likely information in the brain, but since it was not extracted before meeting with the object, it\u2019s easier to consider that it isn\u2019t there.<\/p>\n
You have probably found yourself in such a situation often, and I encounter similar comments frequently \u2013 like 'it was on the tip of my tongue, but I just couldn't articulate it,' or 'this key thought was just what I needed to move forward, but I knew it!'.<\/p>\n
So, John did not extract the benefit from the object or the subject. What remains is the connection. Could he have received benefits from the connection?<\/p>\n
He was in the bar not for the first time, and girls come there regularly. At one point, John even tried to talk to them, but it didn\u2019t go anywhere. Such a connection, or a similar situation, had arisen before. It\u2019s likely the issue doesn\u2019t lie in the connection.<\/p>\n
Then what is it? Let\u2019s return to systems thinking, which states \u2013 hey, guys, don\u2019t try to find the answer by looking separately at objects and connections, it\u2019s not always helpful. There\u2019s also a thing called emergent properties. These are qualities that arise in an interconnected system and cannot be seen by examining objects and connections separately \u2013 as we looked at above.<\/p>\n
Emergent properties, if we can say so, are the properties of the system as a whole when it operates. Of course, if we dig deeply and thoroughly, we will find out where these properties come from. But, probably, the reason for their emergence will turn out to be complex. It will involve the properties of both the object and the subject, as well as the properties of the connections. The stars aligned, in short.<\/p>\n
So, the benefit arose from nowhere. And this happens very often.<\/p>\n
You\u2019re reading a text about cyclists in Amsterdam and remember that you forgot to take a salary statement from work for your visa application \u2013 you want to go to the sea in Greece this summer. The text didn\u2019t mention anything about a visa, Greece, you, or the sea.<\/p>\n
Po shikoni filmin \"Matrix\", dhe vendosni t\u00eb ndaloni duhanin. N\u00eb \"Matrix\", askush nuk pi duhan. Askush nuk flet p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfitimet e ushqyerjes s\u00eb sh\u00ebndetshme \u2013 p\u00ebrkundrazi, her\u00eb pas here han\u00eb biskota.<\/p>\n
Un\u00eb, s\u00eb bashku me vajz\u00ebn time, po d\u00ebgjoj nj\u00eb audioklib\u00ebr \"Neznayka n\u00eb Qytetin e Diellit\" n\u00eb makin\u00eb, dhe arrij t\u00eb kuptoj pse shefi i departamentit ku po zbatoj ndryshime, po k\u00ebrkon rezistenc\u00eb. N\u00eb Neznayka nuk kishte k\u00ebt\u00eb informacion.<\/p>\n
Po d\u00ebgjoj n\u00eb rrug\u00eb drejt pun\u00ebs k\u00ebng\u00ebn e Metallica \"Ronnie Rising Medley\" (nga albumi tribute \"This is your Life\", dedikuar Ronnie James Dio) dhe vendos t\u00eb jap dor\u00ebheqjen nga puna. Por nuk di se p\u00ebr \u00e7far\u00eb flitet n\u00eb k\u00ebng\u00eb \u2013 sepse nuk e di anglisht.<\/p>\n
Ju kuptoni se n\u00eb \u00e7do nj\u00eb nga shembujt, n\u00ebse e shqyrtoni, mund t\u00eb ndihmoni lidhjen e konkluzioneve dhe t\u00eb kuptoni si informata fillestare \u00e7oi n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, vendim ose veprim. Pra, n\u00eb p\u00ebrfitim. Ju mund ta b\u00ebni k\u00ebt\u00eb, n\u00ebse jeni nj\u00eb subjekt.<\/p>\n
Pik\u00ebrisht n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn m\u00ebnyr\u00eb, mund t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtoni k\u00ebt\u00eb lidhje n\u00eb \u00e7do sistem ku ka ndodhur p\u00ebrfitimi. Disa her\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb interesante, p\u00ebr arg\u00ebtim, por nuk do t\u00eb mund ta b\u00ebni k\u00ebt\u00eb vazhdimisht. Ka shum\u00eb situata t\u00eb tilla q\u00eb ndodhin \u00e7do dit\u00eb, duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb ato t\u00eb pavet\u00ebdijshme. Edhe te ju.<\/p>\n
Por m\u00eb e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishmja \u2013 zinxhiri do t\u00eb jet\u00eb \u00e7do her\u00eb ndryshe. Ky zinxhir \u00ebsht\u00eb dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb pron\u00ebsi emergjente. Unike, q\u00eb ka lindur nj\u00ebher\u00eb, nj\u00eb mrekulli e pa p\u00ebrs\u00ebritshme. Sot objekti ju shkakton nj\u00eb ndjenj\u00eb, nj\u00eb vendim, nj\u00eb mendim, nj\u00eb ndri\u00e7im, dhe pas nj\u00eb viti \u2013 asgj\u00eb, ose pik\u00ebrisht e kund\u00ebrta.<\/p>\n
Prandaj, propozoni t\u00eb mos k\u00ebrkoni lidhje shkaku-pasoj\u00eb shum\u00eb shpesh dhe k\u00ebmb\u00ebngul\u00ebs. M\u00eb mir\u00eb pranoj\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrdorimi faktin: p\u00ebrfitimi mund t\u00eb lind\u00eb kudo, n\u00eb \u00e7do koh\u00eb, dhe n\u00eb \u00e7do kombinim.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebrfitimi nuk rri n\u00eb artikuj, libra, filma, mjete, metoda, kompanive, miqve, organizatave, komuniteteve, rrjeteve sociale. P\u00ebrdorimi nuk rri te ju. P\u00ebrdorimi nuk rri te m\u00ebnyrat dhe sjelljet, me t\u00eb cilat lexoni artikuj dhe libra, shihni filma, p\u00ebrdorni mjete dhe metoda, kaloni koh\u00eb me miqt\u00eb dhe n\u00eb kompani, punoni n\u00eb organizata, merrni pjes\u00eb n\u00eb komunitete dhe rrjete sociale.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebrfitimi nuk rri asgj\u00ebkundi. P\u00ebrfitimi lind, kur objekti, subjekti, dhe mes tyre krijohet nj\u00eb lidhje.<\/p>\n
Duket disi rezultate gaforresh dhe naive, apo jo? Si duket, p\u00ebrfitimi \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb mrekulli, buka nga qielli q\u00eb bie, si Pula e Blert\u00eb, n\u00ebn rrethana t\u00eb pakuptueshme? \u00c7far\u00eb duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb tani? T\u00eb studiojm\u00eb dhe t\u00eb presim? \u00c7far\u00eb ndodh me k\u00ebto sisteme?<\/p>\n
Jo, n\u00eb fakt, kuptimi i p\u00ebrfitimit p\u00ebrmes sistemeve e lejon t\u00eb vendosim akcentet e duhura dhe t\u00eb gjejm\u00eb levat. E mbani mend, se t\u00eb menduarit sistemor nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm analiz\u00eb (pse ndodh k\u00ebshtu?), por edhe ndryshimi i sistemeve. N\u00ebse sistemi i p\u00ebrfitimit nuk funksionon, duhet ta ndryshojm\u00eb at\u00eb.<\/p>\n
K\u00ebt\u00eb do ta diskutojm\u00eb her\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr. Gjithashtu do t\u00eb flasim p\u00ebr faktin se nuk ka asnj\u00eb p\u00ebrfitim n\u00eb marrjen e p\u00ebrfitimit. Ndoshta do t\u00eb flasim edhe p\u00ebr Bruce Lee.habr.com<\/a><\/p>","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\u042d\u0442\u043e \u2013 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u0430\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0437\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u044f \u0438\u0437 \u0432\u0441\u0435\u0445, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u044b \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438. \u041f\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043e\u043d\u0430 \u043e \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0435 \u0438 \u0435\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438. \u041d\u0430 \u0435\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u0435\u043d\u044f \u043d\u0430\u0442\u043e\u043b\u043a\u043d\u0443\u043b\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0441 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u043c \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c \u043e\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0438\u0437 \u043f\u043b\u043e\u0449\u0430\u0434\u043e\u043a, \u0433\u0434\u0435 \u044f \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0443\u044e\u0441\u044c. \u0410 \u0434\u043e \u043d\u0435\u0435 \u2013 \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0436\u0434\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0439, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0439 \u0432\u044b \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u043a \u043c\u043e\u0438\u043c \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u044f\u043c. \u0410 \u043c\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u043e\u043c \u2013 \u043f\u043e\u0447\u0442\u0438 \u0432\u0441\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u044f \u0432\u0438\u0436\u0443 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[702],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t