<\/a><\/noindex><\/p>\nShk\u00ebmbim<\/h1>\n \nDok:<\/i> Mir\u00eb, do t\u00eb provoj, por kujdesi \u00ebsht\u00eb mbi vete. Le t\u00eb fillojm\u00eb. A \u00ebsht\u00eb e drejt\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00eb \u00e7do njeri sipas pun\u00ebs?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Jam i sigurt se \u00ebsht\u00eb e drejt\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Pra, marrja sipas pun\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb kusht i nevojsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr ekonomin\u00eb e drejt\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Si realizohet n\u00eb ekonomi marrja sipas pun\u00ebs?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> N\u00eb form\u00eb pagese.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Do t\u00eb thot\u00eb, n\u00eb form\u00eb parash?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebr \u00e7far\u00eb merr para?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> P\u00ebr gj\u00ebrat q\u00eb prodhoj, t\u00eb nevojshme p\u00ebr jetes\u00ebn.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Le t\u00eb quajm\u00eb p\u00ebr shkurt\u00ebsi k\u00ebto gj\u00ebra si mallra.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> M\u00eb dakord.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb b\u00ebn me parat\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> I blej mallra me to. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Merr para p\u00ebr prodhimin e nj\u00eb grupi mallrash dhe shpenzon para p\u00ebr blerjen e nj\u00eb grupi tjet\u00ebr mallrash. A mund t\u00eb thuash se k\u00ebshtu ti shk\u00ebmben mallra me prodhuesit e tjer\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb shk\u00ebmbim q\u00ebndron thelbi i ekonomis\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Duket k\u00ebshtu. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Shk\u00ebmbimi i mallrave duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb proporcionale?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb kupton n\u00ebn shk\u00ebmbimin proporcionale?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00c7do mall p\u00ebrmban nj\u00eb sasi t\u00eb caktuar pune. Sipas k\u00ebsaj proporcioni, mallrat duhet t\u00eb shk\u00ebmbehen.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> E kuptoj. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Kemi dy kushte p\u00ebr shk\u00ebmbimin e drejt\u00eb t\u00eb mallrave. E para: \u00e7do prodhues duhet t\u00eb marr\u00eb sipas pun\u00ebs. E dyta: shk\u00ebmbimi i mallrave duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb proporcionale. A je dakord me mua?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Padyshim.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebrve\u00e7 k\u00ebsaj, a ke d\u00ebgjuar ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb p\u00ebr fitimin?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Sigurisht! Shefi m\u00eb ka bezdissur p\u00ebr t\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> At\u00ebher\u00eb, si \u00ebsht\u00eb e mundur fitimi duke p\u00ebrmbushur dy kushtet q\u00eb pranuam?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Hmmm... Nuk kam menduar.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb, mendohu.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> N\u00ebse \u00e7do njeri merr sipas pun\u00ebs dhe shk\u00ebmbimi \u00ebsht\u00eb proporcional, rezulton se fitimi \u00ebsht\u00eb e pamundur. \u00c7far\u00eb t\u00eb fitoje, at\u00eb ta harxhosh. N\u00ebse dikush ka fitim, at\u00ebher\u00eb dikush tjet\u00ebr ka humbje. I pari \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb pla\u00e7kit\u00ebs, i dyti \u2013 i pla\u00e7kitur.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Nuk jam un\u00eb, je ti q\u00eb tha. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> E \u00e7uditshme.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e \u00e7uditshme?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po mbi konceptin e fitimit \u00ebsht\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuar e gjith\u00eb ekonomia moderne.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ekonomi, por anti-ekonomi. Ta harrojm\u00eb at\u00eb, sidomos fitimin. Fitimi \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb koncept anti-shkencor, q\u00eb na \u00e7on larg nj\u00eb ekonomie t\u00eb drejt\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Mir\u00eb. <\/p>\nPara<\/h1>\n
\nDok:<\/i> T\u00eb vazhdojm\u00eb bised\u00ebn ton\u00eb informuese. M\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigj nj\u00eb pyetje, Garik. N\u00ebse p\u00ebrmbajtja e ekonomis\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb shk\u00ebmbimi i mallrave, pse na duhen monedhat? Pse nuk mund t\u00eb shk\u00ebmbejm\u00eb thjesht mallra?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> \u00cbsht\u00eb m\u00eb e leht\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb pik\u00ebrisht e b\u00ebn k\u00ebt\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb leht\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> N\u00eb at\u00eb q\u00eb me para mund t\u00eb blesh gjith\u00e7ka. Nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nevoja t\u00eb gjesh prodhuesin q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb i interesuar p\u00ebr ty dhe nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht i interesuar p\u00ebr mallin t\u00ebnd.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebr t\u00eb gjitha jam plot\u00ebsisht dakord me ty. Tani m\u00eb thuaj, nga ku duhen t\u00eb dalin parat\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb ekonomi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Shteti do t\u00eb printoj\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> N\u00ebse shteti printon dhe i shp\u00ebrndan zyrtar\u00ebve t\u00eb tij, ata, pa prodhuar asgj\u00eb, do t\u00eb blejn\u00eb mallra me parat\u00eb e sapo printuara. Kjo do t\u00eb \u00e7oj\u00eb n\u00eb shkeljen e nj\u00eb prej rregullave themelore: secili merr sipas pun\u00ebs. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Por zyrtar\u00ebt punojn\u00eb!<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Punojn\u00eb apo jo, na mbetet ta v\u00ebrtetojm\u00eb ende. Paraqet nj\u00eb skenar q\u00eb nuk ka zyrtar\u00eb, dhe as shtet. Nga do t\u00eb dalin parat\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Nuk e di.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Ose si para duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorim ndonj\u00eb mall t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr qarkullim, si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb ari. Por kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb opsion i vjet\u00ebr. Ose - opsioni progresiv - parat\u00eb duhet t'i printojn\u00eb vet\u00eb prodhuesit.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Vete prodhuesit??? Si k\u00ebshtu???<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Kur shk\u00ebmben mallra me dik\u00eb, keni nevoj\u00eb p\u00ebr para?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Jo, nuk kemi nevoj\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> E n\u00ebse t\u00eb duhet ndonj\u00eb mall, por prodhuesi nuk ka nevoj\u00eb p\u00ebr mallin t\u00ebnd?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> M\u00eb duhet ta blej at\u00eb mall.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> T\u00eb blesh, dometh\u00ebn\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00ebsh p\u00ebrmes parave?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb, ty duhet t\u00eb kesh para n\u00eb duar?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Sigurisht.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb para, duhet t'i shesish mallin dikujt?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Sakt\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dhe nga mendon se ajo person do t\u00eb marr\u00eb parat\u00eb, n\u00ebse atij i ndodhin t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat probleme si ty? <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> N\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb, del nj\u00eb situat\u00eb e bllokuar.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Pse \u00ebsht\u00eb pat\u00ebs? Ti mund t\u00eb transferosh mallin t\u00ebnd n\u00eb kredi, p\u00ebr \u00e7ka do t\u00eb marr\u00ebsh nj\u00eb d\u00ebshmi. K\u00ebt\u00eb d\u00ebshmi do t\u00eb pajtohemi ta konsiderojm\u00eb si para.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> E kuptova sakt\u00eb, q\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb ekonomi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb parat\u00eb shfaqen ekskluzivisht gjat\u00eb transferimit t\u00eb mallrave n\u00eb kredi?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Po, kuptove sakt\u00eb. Ta quajm\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kredi si kredi p\u00ebr mallra.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Mir\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Sa \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebllimi i parave n\u00eb sistemin ekonomik, mund t\u00eb m\u00eb thuash?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Sa kredit\u00eb p\u00ebr mallra jan\u00eb l\u00ebshuar, aq \u00ebsht\u00eb edhe v\u00ebllimi.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebrgjigja \u00ebsht\u00eb e gabuar. D\u00ebshmia e l\u00ebshuar parashikon dy an\u00ebt e marr\u00ebveshjes: marr\u00ebsin dhe pages\u00ebn. Nj\u00ebri ka plus, tjetri ka minus. K\u00ebshtu, sistemi monetar parashikon jo vet\u00ebm shuma pozitive, por edhe shuma negative n\u00eb qarkullim. Shumat pozitive \u2013 d\u00ebshmit\u00eb n\u00eb duar, shumat negative \u2013 d\u00ebshmit\u00eb e l\u00ebshuara.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> M\u00eb duket se kuptova.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Tani p\u00ebrgjigju, \u00e7far\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebllimi i parave n\u00eb nj\u00eb sistem ekonomik t\u00eb mbyllur.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> N\u00ebse marrim parasysh shumat pozitive dhe negative, at\u00ebher\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb zero. Sepse n\u00eb kreditin p\u00ebr mallra, nj\u00ebra pal\u00eb merr sakt\u00ebsisht aq sa dor\u00ebzon tjetra.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Mir\u00eb!<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Kjo nuk duket si qarkullimi i sot\u00ebm monetar. K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb, do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se gjysma e njer\u00ebzimit do t\u00eb ket\u00eb shuma negative n\u00eb llogari.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Sakt\u00eb, por kjo nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha dallimet midis qarkullimit t\u00eb parave t\u00eb ekonomis\u00eb moderne antiekonomike dhe ekonomis\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00eb. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb dallimi tjet\u00ebr?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> N\u00ebse parat\u00eb \u2013 jan\u00eb n\u00eb thelb nj\u00eb d\u00ebshmi e marr\u00ebveshjes p\u00ebr kredi mallrash, at\u00ebher\u00eb parat\u00eb duhet t\u00eb anullohen n\u00eb momentin e rikthimit t\u00eb tyre. Kreditori, pasi merr nga borxhi at\u00eb q\u00eb i takon, e shqyer d\u00ebshmin\u00eb. D\u00ebshmia thjesht ndalon s\u00eb ekzistuari. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Por, n\u00ebse e kuptova drejt, ti sugjeron p\u00ebrdorimin e d\u00ebshmive si para!<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Po, sugjeroj, dhe \u00e7far\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> At\u00ebher\u00eb ato nuk mund t\u00eb shkat\u00ebrrohen; d\u00ebshmit\u00eb duhet t\u00eb jen\u00eb n\u00eb qarkullim.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Aspak. Ne jetojm\u00eb prej koh\u00ebsh n\u00eb nj\u00eb bot\u00eb me qarkullim monetar pa para n\u00eb dor\u00eb. \u00c7far\u00eb t\u00eb themi p\u00ebr bot\u00ebn ideale ekonomike t\u00eb diskutuar?! Natyrisht, nuk do t\u00eb ket\u00eb asnj\u00eb d\u00ebshmi: do t\u00eb ket\u00eb llogari personale me bilance pozitive ose negative.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> A do t\u00eb k\u00ebqyren shumat pozitive si shumat negative?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Sakt\u00ebsisht k\u00ebshtu. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Dhe shuma totale e parave n\u00eb qarkullim do t\u00eb ndryshoj\u00eb vazhdimisht?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Do t\u00eb varet nga madh\u00ebsia e kreditit p\u00ebr mallra n\u00eb sistem, si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb e natyrshme.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Dhe v\u00ebllimi total i k\u00ebtyre parave n\u00eb sistem gjithmon\u00eb do t\u00eb jet\u00eb zero?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Po. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> M\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb po thua.<\/p>\nPun\u00eb<\/h1>\n
\nDok:<\/i> Jam i lumtur p\u00ebr ty dhe p\u00ebr veten time. Megjithat\u00eb, le t\u00eb vazhdojm\u00eb me shikimin ton\u00eb t\u00eb shkurt\u00ebr n\u00eb ekonomin\u00eb e drejt\u00eb. E mbaj mend, ne u pajtuam se secili duhet t\u00eb marr\u00eb sipas pun\u00ebs. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Por haruam t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktojm\u00eb se \u00e7far\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb puna.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Si \u00e7far\u00eb? Veprimet p\u00ebr prodhimin e nj\u00eb produkti.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Si t\u00eb kuptojm\u00eb se cilat veprime kryen nj\u00eb njeri - p\u00ebr prodhimin e mallrave apo ndonj\u00eb veprim tjet\u00ebr?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Epo, njeriu vet\u00eb duhet t\u00eb thot\u00eb p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> E n\u00ebse ai g\u00ebnjen ose \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb gabim?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po, ke t\u00eb drejt\u00eb. T\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktosh se cilat veprime kryen njeriu, mund t\u00eb b\u00ebhet vet\u00ebm n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb asaj q\u00eb ai ka arritur n\u00eb fund. N\u00ebse n\u00eb fund doli nj\u00eb produkt - njeriu ka punuar, n\u00ebse nuk doli produkt - njeriu nuk ka punuar.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Nga e dim\u00eb se \u00e7far\u00eb ka arritur secili n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim? Kur b\u00ebhet e dukshme p\u00ebr sistemin pranin\u00eb e produktit?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> N\u00eb momentin e shk\u00ebmbimit t\u00eb mallrave.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> E drejta, por nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb kaq e thjesht\u00eb. Le t\u00eb supozojm\u00eb se produkti i ka kaluar nj\u00eb pronari t\u00eb ri, por ka dal\u00eb me defekt. A \u00ebsht\u00eb e drejt\u00eb q\u00eb prodhuesi t\u00eb marr\u00eb nj\u00eb produkt t\u00eb defektsh\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebmbim t\u00eb produktit t\u00eb tij cil\u00ebsor?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Jo, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e drejt\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> T\u00eb kontrollosh se produkti nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i defektsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Si do t\u00eb kontrollosh?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> T\u00eb b\u00ebsh nj\u00eb ekspertiz\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> E n\u00ebse defekti \u00ebsht\u00eb i fshehur dhe mund t\u00eb zbulohet vet\u00ebm gjat\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb produktit?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> At\u00ebher\u00eb duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrdor\u00ebsh produktin sipas q\u00ebllimit t\u00eb tij dhe t\u00eb shoh\u00ebsh, n\u00ebse \u00ebsht\u00eb defektsh\u00ebm apo cil\u00ebsor.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb, t\u00eb kontrollosh cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e produktit - n\u00eb thelb, a \u00ebsht\u00eb produkti mall - \u00ebsht\u00eb e mundur vet\u00ebm n\u00eb momentin e p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb tij? N\u00ebse p\u00ebrdorimi ka qen\u00eb i suksessh\u00ebm, produkti \u00ebsht\u00eb cil\u00ebsor, p\u00ebrndryshe - i defektsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dhe t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktosh n\u00ebse njeriu ka punuar, \u00ebsht\u00eb e mundur vet\u00ebm pas p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb produktit t\u00eb prodhuar nga ky njeri?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> K\u00ebshtu duket.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> A e di se \u00e7far\u00eb del logjikisht nga kjo?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb? <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Se asnj\u00eb shk\u00ebmbim mallrash nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i mundur. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Por pse??? <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Sepse shk\u00ebmbimi i mallrave ndodh para p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb tyre. N\u00eb momentin e shk\u00ebmbimit \u00ebsht\u00eb e panjohur n\u00ebse mallrat q\u00eb shk\u00ebmbehen jan\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb mallra, apo jan\u00eb thjesht produkte defektoze. Nga kjo perspektiv\u00eb, \u00e7do shk\u00ebmbim \u00ebsht\u00eb i pavlefsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Por shk\u00ebmbimi ndodh!<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Jo, nuk ndodh. N\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb, gjat\u00eb k\u00ebsaj q\u00eb quhet shk\u00ebmbim ndodh kredi e mallrave n\u00eb k\u00ebmbim.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Kur dy prodhues i japin njeri-tjetrit mallra me borxh?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> K\u00ebtu \u00ebsht\u00eb e sakt\u00eb. Ata i japin mallrat n\u00eb kredi dhe presin q\u00eb k\u00ebto mallra t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren. N\u00ebse mallrat p\u00ebrdoren me sukses nga t\u00eb dy pal\u00ebt, shk\u00ebmbimi ka ndodhur. N\u00ebse ndonj\u00eb nga mallrat nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb nj\u00eb defekti, p\u00ebr \u00e7far\u00eb shk\u00ebmbimi t\u00eb barabart\u00eb mund t\u00eb flitet?! Natyrisht, un\u00eb nuk po flas p\u00ebr aspektet ligjore t\u00eb transaksionit n\u00eb antiekonomin\u00eb moderne, por p\u00ebr aspektet faktike t\u00eb transaksionit n\u00eb nj\u00eb ekonomi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> E kuptoj. Per mallrat me defekte nuk ka kompensim.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb thelbi. Prandaj pagesat p\u00ebrmes qarkullimit monetar duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebhen jo n\u00eb momentin e shk\u00ebmbimit - i cili, si\u00e7 e kemi p\u00ebrcaktuar, nuk ekziston - por me kalimin e kredive t\u00eb mallrave dhe pages\u00ebn e tyre.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Wow!<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> A t\u00eb habit di\u00e7ka?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Konsumatori merr mallin nga prodhuesi, por del se duhet p\u00ebr t\u00eb m\u00eb von\u00eb \u2013 n\u00eb momentin e p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb lajm\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> A nuk paguan konsumi p\u00ebr pun\u00ebn e kryer nga prodhuesi?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> P\u00ebr pun\u00ebn.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dhe si\u00e7 e kemi p\u00ebrcaktuar, zbulimi n\u00ebse prodhuesi ka punuar ndodh n\u00eb momentin e p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb mallrave. \u00c7far\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e \u00e7uditshme n\u00eb momentin e pages\u00ebs? Kur b\u00ebhet e qart\u00eb se prodhuesi ka punuar, ai mer n\u00eb llogarin\u00eb \u2013 duhet t\u00eb merret \u2013 kompensimi p\u00ebr pun\u00ebn e tij. <\/p>\nTregu<\/h1>\n
\nGarik:<\/i> Dikush k\u00ebtu nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ashtu. Konsumatori mund ta pranoj\u00eb mallin, por me q\u00ebllim t\u00eb keq nuk e p\u00ebrdor at\u00eb, p\u00ebr shembull nga inati.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Mundet.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Produkti \u00ebsht\u00eb pranuar, por konsumatori nuk i detyrohet asgj\u00eb prodhuesit, sepse produkti nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur prej tij.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Pse duhet konsumatori t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb nj\u00eb gj\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Nga inati, thash\u00eb. Le t\u00eb themi se konsumatori ndjen p\u00ebr prodhuesin nj\u00eb ndjenj\u00eb t\u00eb padrejt\u00eb dhe d\u00ebshiron t'i b\u00ebj\u00eb atij nj\u00eb keq.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Kjo do t'i sjell\u00eb konsumatorit t\u00eb keq etik nj\u00eb d\u00ebm.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Si ndodh kjo?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb mallrat n\u00eb kredi, prodhuesit presin q\u00eb mallrat t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po. At\u00ebher\u00eb veprimet e prodhuesve do t\u00eb njihen si pun\u00eb, dhe ata do t\u00eb marrin kompensim. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, konsumatori rrezikon t\u00eb mos marr\u00eb m\u00eb mallra n\u00eb kredi. Prodhuesit do t\u00eb frik\u00ebsohen se konsumatori nuk do t\u00eb p\u00ebrdor\u00eb mallrat e tyre, k\u00ebshtu q\u00eb do t'i japin mallrat dikuj tjet\u00ebr. Konsumatori i keq etik do t\u00eb ket\u00eb probleme, deri n\u00eb vdekjen nga uria. Si\u00e7 e sheh, n\u00eb nj\u00eb ekonomi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme jo vet\u00ebm t\u00eb kesh para, por edhe reputacion.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Tani kuptoj pse.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dije, p\u00ebr k\u00eb do t\u00eb preferonin prodhuesit t\u00eb dor\u00ebzojn\u00eb produktet e tyre, dhe shum\u00eb gj\u00ebra do t\u00eb b\u00ebhen m\u00eb t\u00eb qarta. Vendose veten n\u00eb vendin e prodhuesit.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Tani do ta provoj. Pra, un\u00eb jam prodhues, kam prodhuar produktin. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebr k\u00eb do ta dor\u00ebzosh produktin p\u00ebr konsum? <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Pra, un\u00eb nuk e shes produktin, si\u00e7 b\u00ebj tani, por e dor\u00ebzoj p\u00ebr konsum n\u00eb kredi?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Po. Konsumatori nuk e zgjedh produktin, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin ka mjaft para, por prodhuesi e zgjedh konsumatorin, nga i cili, sipas mendimit t\u00eb tij, do t\u00eb marr\u00eb m\u00eb shpejt kthimin.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Si mund ta di se cili nga konsumator\u00ebt d\u00ebshiron t\u00eb marr\u00eb produktin tim?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Konsumatori, i cili d\u00ebshiron t\u00eb marr\u00eb produktin, b\u00ebn nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb. Ti lejon ta marr\u00eb produktin ose e refuzon.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Por n\u00ebse ka shum\u00eb produkte? Kjo do t\u00eb jet\u00eb e gjat\u00eb!<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Garik, mos u b\u00eb f\u00ebmini. \u00cbsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb se nevojitet nj\u00eb algorit\u00ebm, i cili dallon konsumator\u00ebt q\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushin kushtet e tua nga ata q\u00eb nuk i p\u00ebrmbushin. Konsumatori sheh n\u00eb sistem se cilat produkte i lejohet t\u00eb marr\u00eb dhe cilat jo.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Skema themelore \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Pra, kujt nga konsumator\u00ebt do t'i dor\u00ebzosh produktin?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Ndoshta atij, q\u00eb ka nj\u00eb bilanc pozitiv n\u00eb llogarin\u00eb e tij. K\u00ebshtu do t\u00eb marr m\u00eb shpejt kthimin.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dhe n\u00ebse nj\u00eb konsumator me bilanc negativ b\u00ebn nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> V\u00ebrtet. K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb vendos\u00ebsh nj\u00eb minimum t\u00eb bilancit pozitiv n\u00eb llogari ose nj\u00eb maksimum t\u00eb bilancit negativ, n\u00ebn t\u00eb cilin produkti mund t\u00eb dor\u00ebzohet p\u00ebr konsum.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Mir\u00eb b\u00ebre! Po mbetet nj\u00eb pyetje e vetme e pazgjidhur. Disa konsumator\u00eb e p\u00ebrdorin produktin t\u00ebnd menj\u00ebher\u00eb pas marrjes, nd\u00ebrsa t\u00eb tjer\u00eb jo menj\u00ebher\u00eb. Disa do t\u00eb d\u00ebshirojn\u00eb ta marrin produktin p\u00ebr, si\u00e7 thon\u00eb, rezerv\u00eb. Si t\u00eb veprojm\u00eb me k\u00ebta konsumator\u00eb t\u00eb shqet\u00ebsuar?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb vendos\u00ebsh n\u00ebse do ta l\u00ebsh produktin ose jo, n\u00eb \u00e7do rast konkret. Shto n\u00eb algoritm kushtet e caktuara p\u00ebr lirimin e produktit.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dhe kujt, sipas algoritmit t\u00ebnd, produkti nuk do t'i lihet, edhe n\u00ebse ka nj\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebnaqshme parash n\u00eb llogarin\u00eb e tij?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Atij, i cili nuk e p\u00ebrdor produktin n\u00eb afatet e pranueshme.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> E di \u00e7far\u00eb do t\u00eb thon\u00eb fjal\u00ebt e tua?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> N\u00eb nj\u00eb ekonomi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb, \u00ebsht\u00eb e pamundur t\u00eb marr\u00ebsh produkte p\u00ebrtej konsumit personal t\u00eb nevojsh\u00ebm. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb nuk kam kund\u00ebrshti. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Kujdes, tregu n\u00eb nj\u00eb ekonomi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb rregullon gjith\u00e7ka \u2013 v\u00ebrtet e rregullon, gj\u00eb q\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb thuhet p\u00ebr anti-ekonomin\u00eb moderne. Anti-ekonomia n\u00ebnkupton tregti t\u00eb tepruar dhe p\u00ebrdorim arbitrar t\u00eb parave, duke zhvilluar k\u00ebshtu cil\u00ebsit\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebqija te njeriu...<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Prit, \u00e7far\u00eb ke Parasysh n\u00ebn p\u00ebrdorimin arbitar t\u00eb parave?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Mund\u00ebsia p\u00ebr t'i shpenzuar ato, jo p\u00ebr konsum personal.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> A d\u00ebshiron t\u00eb jap\u00ebsh, se n\u00eb nj\u00eb ekonomi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb shpenzosh parat\u00eb n\u00eb llogarin\u00eb t\u00ebnde sipas d\u00ebshir\u00ebs?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr konsum personal, p\u00ebrndryshe do t\u00eb ishte n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me parimin \"\u00e7do njeri sipas pun\u00ebs s\u00eb tij\".<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Dhe nuk do t\u00eb mund t\u00eb transferoj ndonj\u00eb shum\u00eb te nj\u00eb vajz\u00eb q\u00eb njoh?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Nuk do t\u00eb mundesh, sepse do t\u00eb ishte n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me parimin \"\u00e7do njeri sipas pun\u00ebs s\u00eb tij\".<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> O Zot! <\/p>\nKoha<\/h1>\n
\nDok:<\/i> Ja, Garik, ne po diskutojm\u00eb p\u00ebr parimin ekonomik \"\u00e7do njeri sipas pun\u00ebs s\u00eb tij\", duke harruar t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktojm\u00eb se n\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb gjendjeje matet puna. Sepse gjat\u00eb shk\u00ebmbimit duhet t\u00eb dihet madh\u00ebsia e pun\u00ebs, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e integruar n\u00eb \u00e7do mall \u2013 vlera e mallrave.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Sakt\u00ebsisht e harxhuam.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Pra, n\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb matet puna?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> A nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb para?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb arsyesh po thua? Parat\u00eb jan\u00eb nj\u00eb shprehje sasiore e kredis\u00eb tregtare, e cila duhet t\u00eb matet me di\u00e7ka.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> N\u00eb koh\u00ebn e pun\u00ebs?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> N\u00eb pik\u00eb! <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Dhe gjithashtu n\u00eb kualifikim.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Garik, m\u00eb zhg\u00ebnjen. Mat\u00ebsi i pun\u00ebs duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb nj\u00eb vler\u00eb objektive, e kualifikimi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb e till\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> A po pretendon se puna matet ekskluzivisht n\u00eb koh\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Po, po e them. Mat\u00ebsi m\u00eb i duksh\u00ebm dhe objektiv i pun\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb koha.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Por a nuk do t\u00eb thot\u00eb kjo se nj\u00eb or\u00eb e koh\u00ebs s\u00eb pun\u00ebs s\u00eb nj\u00eb prodhuesi me kualifikim dhe nj\u00eb prodhuesi pa kualifikim jan\u00eb t\u00eb barabarta!<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dhe \u00e7far\u00eb ka t\u00eb keqe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> N\u00ebse paguhet p\u00ebr \u00e7do pun\u00eb nj\u00ebsoj, do t\u00eb zhduket stimulimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsuar kualifikimin.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Mos thuaj. Ka shum\u00eb vende pune t\u00eb pa kualifikuara, nd\u00ebrsa t\u00eb kualifikuarat jan\u00eb t\u00eb pakta. T\u00eb rris\u00ebsh kualifikimin shpesh \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb fituar nj\u00eb pun\u00eb. Pa specialist\u00ebt e k\u00ebrkuar, nuk do t\u00eb prodhohet asnj\u00eb mall.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Por a \u00ebsht\u00eb e drejt\u00eb q\u00eb nj\u00eb prodhues me kualifikim t\u00eb lart\u00eb t\u00eb fitoj\u00eb aq sa nj\u00eb prodhues me kualifikim t\u00eb ul\u00ebt?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebrgjigj, a mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktohet kualifikimi objektivisht, me nj\u00eb instrument mat\u00ebs n\u00eb duar?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Jo.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> A mere definition of skill level is subjective, or in other words, arbitrary?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> You have strange ideas about justice. Do you think it's fair to determine wage dependence based on a factor set arbitrarily, by someone's will?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> But\u2026 Then\u2026 I\u2019m starting not to understand anything. If we pay only for working time, all workers, regardless of productivity, will receive the same compensation. A workaholic produced 10 units of goods during a ten-hour shift, while a slacker made 1 unit. Shouldn't they receive the same for the time worked?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Of course\u2026<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> What???<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> ...given that the goods will be delivered to the consumer and utilized, which is far from guaranteed.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> What do you mean? <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> We agreed: in a fair economy, the producer should receive compensation only after the goods are used as intended?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> That's true.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> What will be the cost of goods produced by the workaholic and the slacker?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> The workaholic has 10 units of goods after ten hours, which means the cost of one unit is 1 hour. Accordingly, the cost of one unit for the slacker is 10 hours.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Which of the goods, produced by the workaholic or the slacker, will consumers prefer? <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Those produced by the workaholic, they are ten times cheaper.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> As a result, will the goods produced by the slacker remain unused?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> They will.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> And the slacker won\u2019t receive compensation for the time worked?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> K\u00ebshtu duket.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Why do you assert that the workaholic and the slacker will receive equal compensation for the time worked? The workaholic will receive compensation for 10 hours, while the slacker will get nothing, as the goods he produced didn\u2019t find any consumers due to their high cost.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> I get your point. Working slowly is disadvantageous because the goods will be expensive and won\u2019t find buyers?!<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Absolutely disadvantageous!<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Okay, let\u2019s assume people work with the same average productivity, resulting in consumers evenly distributing the products. But in this case, will the compensation received by all producers be the same?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Jo.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Pse?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> The type of goods produced matters.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> I\u2019m starting to understand nothing.<\/p>\n\u00c7mimi<\/h1>\n
\nDok:<\/i> If you don\u2019t get a brain strain, you will understand. Tell me, Garik, how many producers are there for modern goods?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> A multitude.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> What is the reason for this?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> P\u00ebr shkak se nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb fitimprur\u00ebs t\u00eb prodhosh vet\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha produktet, \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb e leverdishme t\u00eb prodhosh nj\u00eb produkt t\u00eb caktuar. Produktet e prodhuara nga prodhues t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm jan\u00eb pjes\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebse t\u00eb produkteve p\u00ebrfundimtare p\u00ebr konsumatorin.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dhe p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, a \u00ebsht\u00eb e nevojshme shk\u00ebmbimi i mallrave p\u00ebr kooperimin dhe specializimin?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Si rezultat, sot kemi shum\u00eb prodhues p\u00ebr produkte moderne. Secili nga prodhuesit pret t\u00eb marr\u00eb nj\u00eb kompensim p\u00ebr pun\u00ebn e tij. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Por p\u00ebr t\u00eb paguar kompensimin, duhet t\u00eb dihet p\u00ebrqindja e secilit prodhues n\u00eb vler\u00ebn totale t\u00eb produktit.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> E sakt\u00eb. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e nevojshme p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> K\u00ebshtu\u2026 Duhet t\u00eb llogaritet p\u00ebrqindja e prodhuesve n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e produktit.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Th\u00ebn\u00eb mir\u00eb. Vlera \u00ebsht\u00eb koha e pun\u00ebs e shpenzuar p\u00ebr t\u00eb prodhuar produktin. Duke u bazuar n\u00eb faktin q\u00eb kompensimi paguhet p\u00ebr prodhuesit, \u00ebsht\u00eb e nevojshme t\u00eb dihet p\u00ebrqindja e tyre n\u00eb vler\u00ebn totale t\u00eb produktit.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Pra, vlera vet\u00eb nuk ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi, r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi ka vlera si koha e pun\u00ebs e shpenzuar p\u00ebr t\u00eb prodhuar produktin nga nj\u00eb prodhues i caktuar.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Sakt\u00ebsisht k\u00ebshtu. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Mir\u00eb, e kuptova q\u00ebndrimin t\u00ebnd\u2026 \u00c7far\u00eb ndodh me llogaritjen e vler\u00ebs s\u00eb produktit sipas prodhuesve t\u00eb caktuar?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Supozoni se prodhuesi e nxori dorazi l\u00ebnd\u00ebn e par\u00eb. Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb vlera e saj?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Koha e shpenzuar nga prodhuesi p\u00ebr nxjerrjen. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Prodhuesi nxorri pjes\u00ebn e dyt\u00eb t\u00eb l\u00ebnd\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb ngjashme, dhe t\u00eb dyja pjes\u00ebt e nxjerra i bashkoi n\u00eb nj\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi. Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb vlera totale e l\u00ebnd\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Shuma e dy vlerave, \u00ebsht\u00eb evidente.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Por \u00e7far\u00eb ndodh me koh\u00ebn e shpenzuar nga prodhuesi p\u00ebr t\u00eb bashkuar pjes\u00ebt n\u00eb nj\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> M\u00eb fal, nuk mendoj p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb. Duhet ta shtojm\u00eb edhe at\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> L\u00ebnda e par\u00eb ka ndryshuar karakteristikat e saj \u2013 n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast \u00ebsht\u00eb grumbulluar n\u00eb nj\u00eb qoshe \u2013 si rezultat i veprimit t\u00eb prodhuesit. Ky \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb atribut fizik i p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm i bot\u00ebs ton\u00eb: disa sende ndryshojn\u00eb n\u00ebn veprimin e sendeve t\u00eb tjera. Propozoj t'i quajm\u00eb sendet e para \u2013 objekte, nd\u00ebrsa sendet e dyta, q\u00eb veprojn\u00eb \u2013 mjete. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Si\u00e7 thuash.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> L\u00ebnda e par\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb objekt, nd\u00ebrsa prodhuesi \u00ebsht\u00eb mjete.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po, e kuptova.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb dallimi themelor mes objekteve dhe mjeteve?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Nuk mund t\u00eb kuptoj.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> E v\u00ebrteta \u00ebsht\u00eb se objektet transferojn\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebsin e tyre material n\u00eb produktet e prodhuara, nd\u00ebrsa mjetet nuk e transferojn\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> E qart\u00eb. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> T\u00eb vazhdojm\u00eb me shembullin ton\u00eb. Imagjino se prodhuesi e prodhoi dorazi nj\u00eb mjet, le t\u00eb themi nj\u00eb lopat\u00eb. Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb vlera e lopat\u00ebs?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Koha e harxhuar p\u00ebr ta prodhuar at\u00eb, n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Tani imagjino q\u00eb prodhuesi i ka bashkuar pjes\u00ebt e l\u00ebnd\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb me nj\u00eb lopat\u00eb, jo me duar. Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb vlera totale e l\u00ebnd\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Vlera e dy pjes\u00ebve plus koha e harxhuar nga prodhuesi plus \u00e7mimi i lopat\u00ebs. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00c7mimi i lopat\u00ebs? P\u00ebr \u00e7far\u00eb?! Lopata do t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret m\u00eb von\u00eb, n\u00eb pun\u00eb t\u00eb ngjashme.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> V\u00ebrtet. At\u00ebher\u00eb... At\u00ebher\u00eb... Duhet ta ndajm\u00eb \u00e7mimin e lopat\u00ebs midis t\u00eb gjitha pun\u00ebve t\u00eb ngjashme.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Ti nuk e di se sa t\u00eb tilla do t\u00eb ket\u00eb. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Mund ta llogarisim p\u00ebraf\u00ebrsisht.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Mbaje mend, Garik, ekonomia e drejt\u00eb nuk toleron p\u00ebraf\u00ebrsi. Ose ekziston drejt\u00ebsia, at\u00ebher\u00eb ekzistojn\u00eb ligjet objektive t\u00eb ekonomis\u00eb. Ose nuk ekziston drejt\u00ebsia, at\u00ebher\u00eb ekonomia si shkenc\u00eb nuk ekziston fare, dhe ne nuk kemi \u00e7far\u00eb t\u00eb diskutojm\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> M\u00eb p\u00eblqen m\u00eb shum\u00eb kur ekziston.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> At\u00ebher\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigju: si duhet llogaritur \u00e7mimi i mallrave duke p\u00ebrdorur vegla jo t\u00eb gjalla, si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb lopata n\u00eb rastin ton\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Nuk e di.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> T\u00eb kam dh\u00ebn\u00eb nj\u00eb sugjerim: vegla \u00ebsht\u00eb jo e gjall\u00eb. Por ka edhe vegla t\u00eb gjalla...<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Prodhuesi?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb. \u00c7far\u00eb sasia e mallrave rrit \u00e7mimin p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb pjes\u00ebmarrjes s\u00eb prodhuesit n\u00eb procesin e prodhimit?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> P\u00ebr shkakun e koh\u00ebs s\u00eb harxhuar nga prodhuesi.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> N\u00ebse pranon ekzistenc\u00ebn e ligjeve ekonomike, duhet t\u00eb pranoje veprimin e tyre t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00eb ndaj entiteteve t\u00eb ngjashme. Prodhuesi dhe lopata jan\u00eb entitete t\u00eb nj\u00ebjta, t\u00eb dy jan\u00eb vegla. K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb rendi i pjes\u00ebmarrjes s\u00eb tyre n\u00eb procesin e prodhimit \u00ebsht\u00eb identik.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> P\u00ebrpiqesh t\u00eb thuash...<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Se mallrat duhet t\u00eb rrisin vler\u00ebn e tyre n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e pjes\u00ebmarrjes n\u00eb procesin e prodhimit t\u00eb \u00e7do vegle, si t\u00eb gjall\u00eb ashtu edhe t\u00eb vdekur.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> \u00c7mimi i veglave t\u00eb vdekur nuk ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Por \u00e7mimi i prodhuesit ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi? Ai nuk ka ndonj\u00eb vler\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Por at\u00ebher\u00eb... <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Po t\u00eb d\u00ebgjoj me v\u00ebmendje.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb \u00e7mimi i vegl\u00ebs nuk ka asnj\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi kur llogaritim \u00e7mimin e mallrave.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Sakt\u00ebsisht k\u00ebshtu.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Nuk po arrij ta kuptoj se \u00e7far\u00eb ndodhi.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Ndoshta n\u00eb at\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb thash\u00eb nga fillimi: ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi se \u00e7far\u00eb malli duhet prodhuar. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Nuk e kuptoj.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Ndjek mendimin pas meje dhe nuk do t\u00eb gabosh. Prodhuesi ka krijuar nj\u00eb mjet. Koha e krijimit t\u00eb mjeteve p\u00ebrb\u00ebn koston e tij.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Mjete jan\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur n\u00eb prodhimin e produktit. Kostoja e produktit u rrit gjat\u00eb koh\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb mjeteve, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht prodhuesi i mjetit mori nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb n\u00eb produktin e prodhuar. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> A nuk varet kjo pjes\u00eb nga koha e krijimit t\u00eb mjeteve?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> N\u00ebse t\u00eb besoj, at\u00ebher\u00eb nuk varet.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Shfaqet nj\u00eb paradoks: gjat\u00eb prodhimit t\u00eb mjeteve, koha e krijimit transformohet n\u00eb nj\u00eb madh\u00ebsi tjet\u00ebr \u2013 koh\u00ebn e p\u00ebrdorimit. Prodhuesi i mjetit punoi p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb kohe, por do t\u00eb kompensohet p\u00ebr nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr periudh\u00eb \u2013 at\u00eb q\u00eb \"p\u00ebrdori\" mjeti i prodhuar prej tij.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Por kjo i bie ndesh parimit \"\u00e7do kush merr sipas pun\u00ebs!\"<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Aspak. N\u00eb themel t\u00eb k\u00ebtij transformimi vazhdon t\u00eb jet\u00eb puna.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> At\u00ebher\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb prodhuesit do t\u00eb fillojn\u00eb t\u00eb prodhojn\u00eb mjete dhe askush \u2013 objekte! Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb m\u00eb fitimprur\u00ebse.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Jo gjithmon\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Pse jo gjithmon\u00eb? <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> S\u00eb pari, nevoja p\u00ebr mjete nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e pafund. Diku do t\u00eb ket\u00eb dikush q\u00eb do t\u00eb prodhoj\u00eb objekte, ndryshe mallrat do t\u00eb p\u00ebrfundojn\u00eb t\u00eb pa prodhuara.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb. Dhe s\u00eb dyti?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> S\u00eb dyti, mjeti mund t\u00eb thyer para se koha e p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb tejkaloj\u00eb koh\u00ebn e krijimit. Sepse transformimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i mundur jo vet\u00ebm n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb rritjes s\u00eb koh\u00ebs s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, por edhe n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb zvog\u00eblimit.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po, duket logjike. A \u00ebsht\u00eb kjo e gjitha?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Ka edhe nj\u00eb t\u00eb tret\u00eb. Pika e tret\u00eb ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me konsumimin.<\/p>\nKonsumimi<\/h1>\n
\nGarik:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb lidhje ka konsumimi k\u00ebtu? Ne po flasim p\u00ebr mjete.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Klasifikimi i gj\u00ebrave n\u00eb objekte dhe mjete \u00ebsht\u00eb i vlefsh\u00ebm gjithashtu n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e konsumit.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Si \u00ebsht\u00eb kjo?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Ne ra dakord q\u00eb prodhuesi merr kompensim p\u00ebr pun\u00ebn e tij n\u00eb momentin e konsumimit t\u00eb produktit t\u00eb tij.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po, merr.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Konsumatori ka m\u00ebngjes. N\u00eb at\u00eb moment pranohet e drejta e prodhuesit p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb kompensim p\u00ebr produktin e tij t\u00eb prodhuar \u2013 n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast p\u00ebr ushqimin.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Pa kund\u00ebrshtim.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebrdorimi i ushqimit ndodh nj\u00eb moment. Pse?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Dhe pse k\u00ebshtu?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Sepse ushqimi p\u00ebrdoret si nj\u00eb objekt. Ka objekte dhe mjete t\u00eb prodhimit, dhe ka t\u00eb konsumit.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> P\u00ebrpiqesh t\u00eb thuash...<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Deshiroj t\u00eb them se njer\u00ebzit konsumojn\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm objekte, por gjithashtu mjete. Objektet konsumohen nj\u00eb moment, nd\u00ebrsa mjetet \u2013 p\u00ebrmes koh\u00ebs. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Ushqimi \u00ebsht\u00eb objekte, nd\u00ebrsa nd\u00ebrtimet, mobiljet, automjetet, kompjuter\u00ebt jan\u00eb mjete?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Sakt\u00eb! <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> At\u00ebher\u00eb n\u00eb cilin moment mjeti konsiderohet i konsumuar, q\u00eb prodhuesi t\u00eb marr\u00eb kompensim p\u00ebr t\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb pik\u00ebrisht \u00e7\u00ebshtja, sepse konsumimi i mjetit ndodh gjat\u00eb gjith\u00eb periudh\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb tij! Dhe konsumatori duhet t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb kompensimin sipas koh\u00ebs s\u00eb konsumimit t\u00eb mjetit.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> P\u00ebr objekte, konsumatori paguan kompensimin sipas \u00e7mimit t\u00eb tyre, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr mjetet \u2013 sipas koh\u00ebs s\u00eb prodhimit t\u00eb tyre?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Shkurt, si n\u00eb prodhim. Ligjet ekonomike veprojn\u00eb nj\u00ebsoj p\u00ebr prodhimin dhe konsumimin. Prandaj thash\u00eb: ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi se \u00e7far\u00eb produkti prodhohet. P\u00ebr objekte, prodhuesi do t\u00eb marr\u00eb sipas \u00e7mimit t\u00eb tyre, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr mjete \u2013 sipas koh\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> A \u00ebsht\u00eb kjo e drejt\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Imagjino dy llamba. E para \u00ebsht\u00eb djegur pas 10 muajsh, nd\u00ebrsa e dyta pas 1 muaji. A nuk t\u00eb duket se e para duhet t\u00eb kushtoj\u00eb dhjet\u00eb her\u00eb m\u00eb shum\u00eb se e dyta?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Duket k\u00ebshtu.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00c7do sistem ekonomik, n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin ky kusht nuk respektohet, \u00ebsht\u00eb absurd.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po, pajtohem me ty, pajtohem... Ti ishe duke planifikuar t\u00eb m\u00eb tregosh arsyen e tret\u00eb, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn prodhimi i mjeteve mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb i paarsyesh\u00ebm. <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> M\u00eb fal. Arsyet e treta jan\u00eb vonesa e kompensimit p\u00ebr mjetet e prodhimit.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> P\u00ebr \u00e7far\u00eb vonese flisni? Nuk kuptoj.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Konsumatori paguan vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr at\u00eb q\u00eb p\u00ebrdor?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Sigurisht.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> I p\u00ebrket ushqimit, nd\u00ebrtimeve, mobileve, automjeteve, kompjuter\u00ebve, apo jo?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dhe p\u00ebr mjete prodhimi: thika, filetuese, makinerit\u00eb dhe t\u00eb tjera?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Jo, n\u00ebse k\u00ebto produkte nuk i duhen.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb \"nuk i duhen\"?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Kisha n\u00eb mendje: n\u00ebse ai nuk merret me prodhimin.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Dhe n\u00ebse merret?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> At\u00ebher\u00eb ai do t\u00eb duhet t'i blej\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, personi vepron si prodhues?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Po.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Por n\u00eb nj\u00eb ekonomi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb, prodhuesi nuk ka nevoj\u00eb t\u00eb blej\u00eb asgj\u00eb nga prodhuesit e tjer\u00eb. Duke prodhuar produktin s\u00eb bashku, prodhuesit veprojn\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb q\u00ebllim t\u00eb p\u00ebrbashk\u00ebt, n\u00eb nj\u00eb baz\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunimi, pa bler\u00eb nga njeri-tjetri. Ata presin kompensim nga konsumatori \u2013 ai q\u00eb e p\u00ebrdor produktin p\u00ebr konsum personal.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Si do ta marr\u00eb kompensimin prodhuesi i thik\u00ebs ose filetuese?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Ashtu si\u00e7 parashikohet nga logjika ekonomike: nga konsumatori i produktit, i b\u00ebr\u00eb me ndihm\u00ebn e k\u00ebsaj thike ose filetuese.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Prodhuesi, q\u00eb ka prodhuar mjetin e prodhimit, do t'i duhet t\u00eb pres\u00eb derisa me ndihm\u00ebn e k\u00ebtij mjeti t\u00eb prodhohet nj\u00eb mall p\u00ebr konsum?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Sakt\u00ebsisht! K\u00ebt\u00eb e quajta vones\u00eb n\u00eb marrjen e shk\u00ebmbimit. Prandaj, prodhimi i mjeteve t\u00eb prodhimit mund t\u00eb duket i pafavorsh\u00ebm. Shk\u00ebmbimi p\u00ebr artikujt e prodhuar mund t\u00eb merret shpejt, p\u00ebr mjete konsumimi \u2013 do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb merret gradualisht, sipas konsumit t\u00eb tyre, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr mjete prodhimi \u2013 do t\u00eb nevojitet t\u00eb pritet p\u00ebrfundimi i disa proceseve pasardh\u00ebse.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Pse disa?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Me ndihm\u00ebn e nj\u00eb \u00e7eki\u00e7i u prodhua nj\u00eb skel\u00eb, me ndihm\u00ebn e skel\u00ebs \u2013 nj\u00eb makin\u00eb, me ndihm\u00ebn e makin\u00ebs \u2013 nj\u00eb kubik. Prodhuesi i \u00e7eki\u00e7it do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb pres\u00eb derisa kubiku t\u00eb jet\u00eb n\u00eb tryez\u00eb t\u00eb konsumatorit, deri at\u00ebher\u00eb ai nuk do t\u00eb marr\u00eb shk\u00ebmbimin p\u00ebr \u00e7eki\u00e7in e tij (sigurisht, vet\u00ebm nga konsumatori i kubikut, por jo nga konsumator\u00ebt e tjer\u00eb). Drejt\u00ebsia ekonomike k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb \u00e7do prodhues t\u00eb jet\u00eb i interesuar t\u00eb krijoj\u00eb mallra p\u00ebr konsum personal. Konsumi personal \u00ebsht\u00eb q\u00ebllimi, gjith\u00eb t\u00eb tjerat \u2013 pika nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebse n\u00eb arritjen e q\u00ebllimit p\u00ebrfundimtar. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> M\u00eb duhet ta mendoj k\u00ebt\u00eb. <\/p>\nSocializmi<\/h1>\n
\nDok:<\/i> Kujdes, vonesa n\u00eb marrjen e shk\u00ebmbimeve p\u00ebr mjete prodhimi p\u00ebrcakton mb\u00ebshtetje sociale.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> A jan\u00eb pensionet? Si ndodh kjo???<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> T\u00eb marrim sekuenc\u00ebn e m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme t\u00eb mjeteve t\u00eb prodhimit: \u00e7eki\u00e7i \u2013 skela \u2013 makin\u00eb. A ka nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb prodhuesit t\u00eb \u00e7eki\u00e7it n\u00eb \u00e7mimin e skel\u00ebs?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Sigurisht, ka. Sepse skela \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrgatitur me ndihm\u00ebn e \u00e7eki\u00e7it: prodhuesi i \u00e7eki\u00e7it gjithashtu, ndon\u00ebse n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00ebrthort\u00eb, ka punuar mbi skel\u00ebn.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> A ka nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb prodhuesit t\u00eb skel\u00ebs n\u00eb \u00e7mimin e makin\u00ebs?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Ka, p\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn arsye.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> A ka nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb prodhuesit t\u00eb \u00e7eki\u00e7it n\u00eb \u00e7mimin e makin\u00ebs?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Hm... Po... N\u00ebse n\u00eb \u00e7mimin e skel\u00ebs ka nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb prodhuesit t\u00eb \u00e7eki\u00e7it, at\u00ebher\u00eb ka.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb kjo?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Procesi i prodhimit \u00ebsht\u00eb i vazhduesh\u00ebm, n\u00eb at\u00eb kuptim q\u00eb me ndihm\u00ebn e mjeteve prodhohen t\u00eb tjera. Prandaj, n\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha mjetet e prodhimit pasardh\u00ebse do t\u00eb ket\u00eb nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb prodhuesit t\u00eb mjetit t\u00eb par\u00eb \u2013 asaj me t\u00eb cil\u00ebn gjith\u00e7ka filloi.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> T\u00eb thjeshtit q\u00ebndron, apo?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> N\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb simbolike, po.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Supozoni. Por \u00e7far\u00eb ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb kjo me mb\u00ebshtetje sociale?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Nd\u00ebrsa njer\u00ebzit humbasin aft\u00ebsin\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb punuar, ata vazhdojn\u00eb t\u00eb marrin para p\u00ebr mjetet e pun\u00ebs q\u00eb kan\u00eb prodhuar nj\u00ebher\u00eb. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> E qart\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Parat\u00eb vazhdojn\u00eb t\u00eb bien edhe pas vdekjes s\u00eb njeriut, gj\u00eb q\u00eb i jep mund\u00ebsin\u00eb paraardh\u00ebsve t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtesin pasardh\u00ebsit.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Epo, un\u00eb po e mendoja se si principi \"\u00e7do njeriu sipas pun\u00ebs\" lejon mb\u00ebshtetje p\u00ebr f\u00ebmij\u00ebt. Po f\u00ebmij\u00ebt, a nuk punojn\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Plot\u00ebsisht e sakt\u00eb. Principi \"\u00e7do njeriu sipas pun\u00ebs\" nuk lejon thjesht t\u00eb transferosh para nga llogaria jote, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb favor t\u00eb f\u00ebmij\u00ebve. Fatmir\u00ebsisht, as kjo nuk k\u00ebrkohet, pasi f\u00ebmij\u00ebt q\u00eb nga lindja kan\u00eb shuma t\u00eb ve\u00e7anta n\u00eb llogarit\u00eb e tyre. A e kupton tani?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Jo.<\/p>\nInformacion<\/h1>\n
\nDok:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb nuk kupton?<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Shum\u00eb gj\u00ebra. N\u00eb ve\u00e7anti, pse n\u00eb shpjegimet e tua nuk p\u00ebrmende kompanit\u00eb. A nuk e sjell n\u00eb nevoj\u00eb organizimin e kompanive q\u00eb nj\u00eb produkt t\u00eb ket\u00eb shum\u00eb prodhues?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Kurrsesi. Ne supozojm\u00eb se ekonomia e drejt\u00eb vepron n\u00eb kushte t\u00eb plot\u00eb informacioni, prandaj lidhjet midis prodhuesve gjurmohen. Kompanit\u00eb jan\u00eb nj\u00eb arkaik i civilizimit para-kompjuterik, ndon\u00ebse arkaizmi ka shum\u00eb kuptime. Institucioni i personave juridik\u00eb sh\u00ebrben si nj\u00eb justifikim teorik p\u00ebr at\u00eb q\u00eb kemi r\u00ebn\u00eb dakord t\u00eb mos e p\u00ebrmendim kurrsesi.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Fitimi?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Hesht, i mjer\u00eb! <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Jam i heshtur, por megjithat\u00eb... Si mund t\u00eb marr\u00ebsh vendime menaxheriale pa kompani? Proceset moderne t\u00eb prodhimit jan\u00eb t\u00eb nd\u00ebrlikuara. Nuk mund ta imagjinoj se mij\u00ebra e dhjet\u00ebra mij\u00ebra prodhues do t\u00eb bien dakord p\u00ebr at\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb do t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb me produktin e tyre.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Ata q\u00eb nuk ndihen t\u00eb sigurt n\u00eb shkenc\u00ebn e menaxhimit, delegojn\u00eb t\u00eb drejtat e votimit tek nj\u00eb person m\u00eb t\u00eb kualifikuar. Ky person \u2014 nj\u00ebfar\u00eb drejtori \u2014 merr vendime. Diferenca e tij e vetme nga p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuesit e drejtoris\u00eb moderne \u00ebsht\u00eb se nuk merr kompensim p\u00ebr vendimet e marra.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb!!! Do t\u00eb thot\u00eb, drejtor \u2014 jo, nj\u00eb grup drejtor\u00ebsh t\u00eb zgjedhur rast\u00ebsisht \u2014 nuk duhet t\u00eb marr\u00eb paga! Por at\u00ebher\u00eb, vendimi menaxherial nuk do t\u00eb merret, nuk do t\u00eb ket\u00eb t\u00eb interesuar, dhe edhe n\u00ebse ka, ata nuk do t\u00eb bien dakord.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, produkti nuk do t\u00eb arrij\u00eb te konsumatori, prodhuesit \u2014 t\u00eb gjith\u00eb, deri n\u00eb t\u00eb fundit \u2014 nuk do t\u00eb marrin kompensim. Pra, je shum\u00eb gabim: vendimet menaxheriale do t\u00eb merren, shpejt dhe sipas nevoj\u00ebs. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Por megjithat\u00eb, menaxher\u00ebt punojn\u00eb, ata prodhojn\u00eb produktin menaxherial!<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Nuk ka asnj\u00eb produkt menaxherial, ka veprimtari intelektuale. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb karakteristike p\u00ebr \u00e7do pun\u00eb, prandaj mendojn\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm drejtor\u00ebt. Edhe nj\u00eb ndihm\u00ebs duhet t\u00eb mendoj\u00eb shum\u00eb mir\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos e prishur materialin.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Deshiron t\u00eb thuash se aktiviteti intelektual nuk shp\u00ebrblehet? \u00c7far\u00eb do t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb artist\u00ebt: t\u00eb gjith\u00eb shkrimtar\u00ebt, kompozitor\u00ebt, piktor\u00ebt dhe t\u00eb tjer\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Harik, po ngat\u00ebrron dhurat\u00ebn e Zotit me omlet\u00ebn. Artist\u00ebt prodhojn\u00eb produkte t\u00eb prekshme: libra, nota, piktura. Po, produktet e tyre kan\u00eb natyr\u00eb informuese, prandaj mund t\u00eb kopjohen n\u00eb media t\u00eb tjera. Megjithat\u00eb, \u00e7do produkt intelektual ka nj\u00eb komponent material, t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn elektronik ose magnetik. Prodhuesit e sendeve me p\u00ebrmbajtje informuese jan\u00eb artist\u00ebt. Nd\u00ebrsa menaxher\u00ebt zakonisht nuk prodhojn\u00eb asnj\u00eb mall. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Koka m\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb mbushur me mendime.<\/p>\nEpilogu<\/h1>\n
\nDok:<\/i> Mos u shqet\u00ebso. N\u00eb nj\u00eb bised\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb t\u00eb tregoj gjith\u00e7ka q\u00eb di. Ekonomia \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb shkenc\u00eb e nd\u00ebrlikuar, t\u00eb kam njoftuar. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, sistemi i drejt\u00eb q\u00eb po diskutojm\u00eb, gjithsesi mbetet i padisht\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Si mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb i padisht\u00eb??? Pse??? <\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> S\u00eb pari, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb vazhdim\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb prodhimit ekonomik. Mjetet p\u00ebrdoren p\u00ebr t\u00eb prodhuar mjete t\u00eb tjera, t\u00eb cilat p\u00ebrdoren p\u00ebr t\u00eb prodhuar mjete t\u00eb tjera, dhe k\u00ebshtu me radh\u00eb. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Dhe \u00e7far\u00eb nga kjo?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebr t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuar nj\u00eb ekonomi plot\u00ebsisht t\u00eb drejt\u00eb, duhet t\u00eb fillosh nga zero, dhe kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb praktikisht e pamundur. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb duhet t\u00eb shkat\u00ebrrohen t\u00eb gjitha vlerat materiale ekzistuese, gj\u00eb q\u00eb nuk ka kuptim, ose t\u00eb rikthehen t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e nevojshme p\u00ebr k\u00ebto vlera materiale, gj\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e pamundur.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Ka arsye t\u00eb tjera?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Po, ekonomin\u00eb e drejt\u00eb supozon plot\u00ebsin\u00eb e informacionit, e cila mungon. Duhet t\u00eb llogaritet \u00e7mimi i mallrave, t\u00eb mbahet llogarit\u00eb personale, t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktohen momentet e konsumit dhe shum\u00eb gj\u00ebra t\u00eb tjera. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb e komplikuar, por teorikisht e realizueshme. Sidoqoft\u00eb, p\u00ebr implementimin praktik nevojiten kapacitete njer\u00ebzore. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, k\u00ebto kapacitete duhet t\u00eb jen\u00eb t\u00eb jashtme nga ekonomia, sepse pik\u00ebrisht me ndihm\u00ebn e tyre ajo realizohet. Ekonomia vet\u00eb nuk parashikon nd\u00ebrtimin e k\u00ebtij lloj sistemi teknologjik. Nuk dihet se nga ku t\u00eb merret k\u00ebto kapacitete, t\u00eb prodhuara jasht\u00eb sistemit ekonomik\u2026 N\u00ebse ato kapacitete nuk shfaqen papritur nga askund.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> A \u00ebsht\u00eb kjo e gjitha?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebr fat t\u00eb keq, jo. Arsyeja kryesore pse ekonomia e drejt\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtohet \u00ebsht\u00eb liria e vullnetit t\u00eb njeriut.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Liria e vullnetit?!<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Po, pik\u00ebrisht ajo. Rregullat vet\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb sigurojn\u00eb zbatimin e tyre. Nuk ka rregulla ekonomike q\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb shkel\u00ebn. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> P\u00ebr shkeljen e rregullave \u00ebsht\u00eb e mundur t\u00eb nd\u00ebshkohesh.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00ebsht\u00eb e mundur, por kjo nuk garanton zbatimin e tyre n\u00eb t\u00eb ardhmen. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, nd\u00ebshkimi parashikon nj\u00eb integrim n\u00eb sistem, nd\u00ebrsa sistemi ekonomik i bazuar n\u00eb parimin \"\u00e7do njeri sipas pun\u00ebs s\u00eb tij\", nuk parashikon di\u00e7ka t\u00eb till\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> N\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb kuptimi nuk parashikon?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> N\u00eb kuptimin q\u00eb, sipas logjik\u00ebs ton\u00eb, ekzekutori i nd\u00ebshkimit nuk punon, q\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se nuk prodhon asgj\u00eb q\u00eb mund t\u00eb konsumohet. Prandaj, ai nuk mund t\u00eb marr\u00eb kompensim p\u00ebr veprimet e tij t\u00eb papuna. Ai q\u00eb e ka shkelur rregullin dhe ekzekutori i nd\u00ebshkimit, q\u00eb ka marr\u00eb shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr veprimet e tij, nga k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrimi ekonomik nuk diferencohen shum\u00eb nga nj\u00ebri-tjetri.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> \u00c7far\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> Zgjidhja e sakt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb transferosh nd\u00ebshkimet dhe \u00e7do gj\u00eb t\u00eb ngjashme, deri te vet\u00eb shteti, n\u00eb sfidat e ekonomis\u00eb: aty ku veprojn\u00eb jo stimuj ekonomik\u00eb, por ndonj\u00eb lloj tjet\u00ebr. Por edhe kjo mas\u00eb nuk do t\u00eb \u00e7oj\u00eb n\u00eb zhdukjen e plot\u00eb t\u00eb krimeve ekonomike, derisa baza e t\u00eb gjitha shkeljeve - liria e vullnetit - t\u00eb mbetet e paprekur. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Pra, nuk ekziston m\u00ebnyr\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuar nj\u00eb shoq\u00ebri ekonomike t\u00eb drejt\u00eb?<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> P\u00ebrsa koh\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb njer\u00ebzit nuk d\u00ebshirojn\u00eb nj\u00eb gj\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb, jo, nuk ekziston.<\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Por njer\u00ebzit mund t\u00eb detyrohen p\u00ebr drejt\u00ebsin\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Dok:<\/i> \u00cbsht\u00eb e mundur. Sidoqoft\u00eb, si\u00e7 e thash\u00eb, mekanizmi i detyrimit duhet t\u00eb nxirret jasht\u00eb fush\u00ebs s\u00eb ekonomis\u00eb, n\u00eb t\u00eb tjet\u00ebr rast, struktura e nd\u00ebrtuar nuk do t\u00eb jet\u00eb e drejt\u00eb. Drejt\u00ebsia lidhet me nj\u00eb humbje t\u00eb pjesshme t\u00eb liris\u00eb s\u00eb vullnetit nga ana e njer\u00ebzimit. <\/p>\n
Garik:<\/i> Ke pasur t\u00eb drejt\u00eb, Dok, un\u00eb kam nj\u00eb dalje t\u00eb trurit.habr.com<\/a><\/p>","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\u041f\u0440\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433 \u0413\u0430\u0440\u0438\u043a: \u0414\u043e\u043a, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0442\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0435 \u044d\u043a\u043e\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0438\u043a\u0430? \u0414\u043e\u043a: \u0422\u0435\u0431\u044f \u043a\u0430\u043a\u0430\u044f \u044d\u043a\u043e\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0438\u043a\u0430 \u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0443\u0435\u0442: \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0439\u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0435\u0442 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u043e\u043d\u0430 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u0430 \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u0438\u0434\u0435\u0430\u043b\u0435? \u042d\u0442\u043e \u0432\u0435\u0441\u044c\u043c\u0430 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u043f\u043e \u0431\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0448\u0435\u0439 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432\u0437\u0430\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0438\u0441\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0430\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435. \u0413\u0430\u0440\u0438\u043a: \u041a\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u043e\u043d\u0430 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u0430 \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u0438\u0434\u0435\u0430\u043b\u0435. \u0414\u043e\u043a: \u0422\u043e \u0435\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0434\u043b\u0438\u0432\u0430\u044f? \u0413\u0430\u0440\u0438\u043a: \u0418\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e \u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0434\u043b\u0438\u0432\u0430\u044f! \u041a \u0447\u0435\u043c\u0443 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0438\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f, \u043a\u0430\u043a \u043d\u0435 \u043a \u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0434\u043b\u0438\u0432\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438?! \u0414\u043e\u043a: \u0410 \u0432\u044b\u0432\u0438\u0445 \u0433\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043c\u043e\u0437\u0433\u0430 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":1,"featured_media":26525,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[702],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35357","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t
![\"Biseda](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/a8bbd4987b0537fb553cb4901f36abaa.jpeg\")