{"id":82544,"date":"2020-05-22T13:42:33","date_gmt":"2020-05-22T11:42:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/blog\/administrirovanie\/kak-my-proveryali-proizvoditelnost-novyh-proczessorov-v-oblake-dlya-1s-po-testu-gilyova"},"modified":"2020-05-22T13:42:33","modified_gmt":"2020-05-22T11:42:33","slug":"kak-my-proveryali-proizvoditelnost-novyh-proczessorov-v-oblake-dlya-1s-po-testu-gilyova","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/sq\/blog\/administrirovanie\/kak-my-proveryali-proizvoditelnost-novyh-proczessorov-v-oblake-dlya-1s-po-testu-gilyova","title":{"rendered":"Si e testuam performanc\u00ebn e procesor\u00ebve t\u00eb rinj n\u00eb cloud p\u00ebr 1C me testin Gilyov","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Si
\n
\nNuk i hapim Amerik\u00ebn n\u00ebse themi se makinat virtuale n\u00eb procesor\u00ebt e rinj jan\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb fuqishme se pajisjet me procesor\u00eb t\u00eb brezit t\u00eb kaluar. Ajo q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb interesante \u00ebsht\u00eb se, kur analizojm\u00eb mund\u00ebsit\u00eb e sistemeve q\u00eb, duksh\u00ebm, jan\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb af\u00ebrta n\u00eb karakteristikat e tyre teknike, rezultati mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb krejt\u00ebsisht i ndrysh\u00ebm. Ne e verifikuam k\u00ebt\u00eb kur testuam procesor\u00ebt Intel n\u00eb cloud-in ton\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb par\u00eb se cil\u00ebt prej tyre ofrojn\u00eb kthimin m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb n\u00eb pun\u00ebn e sistemeve mbi 1C. <\/p>\n

Spoiler: si\u00e7 tregoi testi yn\u00eb, gjith\u00e7ka varet nga detyra e vendosur. Arrit\u00ebm t\u00eb zgjedhim produktin m\u00eb t\u00eb mir\u00eb nga e gjith\u00eb gama e re e procesor\u00ebve Intel, i cili dha nj\u00eb p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsim t\u00eb konsideruesh\u00ebm t\u00eb performanc\u00ebs fal\u00eb faktit se Intel Xeon Gold 6244 ka nj\u00eb num\u00ebr m\u00eb t\u00eb vog\u00ebl b\u00ebrthamakesh, \u00e7far\u00ebdo b\u00ebrthame ka m\u00eb shum\u00eb memorie L3 dhe nj\u00eb frekuenc\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb takti - si n\u00eb baz\u00eb, ashtu edhe n\u00eb modin Turbo Boost. Me fjal\u00eb t\u00eb tjera, k\u00ebta procesor\u00eb e p\u00ebrballojn\u00eb m\u00eb mir\u00eb ngarkes\u00ebn e k\u00ebrkesave intensive p\u00ebr burime n\u00eb raportin e performanc\u00ebs p\u00ebr \u00e7do lek t\u00eb shpenzuar. P\u00ebr 1C, kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb ideale: me procesor\u00ebt e rinj, aplikacionet n\u00eb 1C n\u00eb cloud-in ton\u00eb filluan t\u00eb<\/p>\n

Tani le t\u00eb flasim p\u00ebr m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn se si ne realizuam testimin. M\u00eb posht\u00eb jan\u00eb rezultatet e testeve sintetike t\u00eb Gilev\u00ebs. Mund t\u00eb orientoheni nga ato, por p\u00ebr \u00e7do rast duhet t\u00eb kontrolloni vet\u00eb konsumimin real t\u00eb burimeve n\u00eb detyrat tuaja. <\/a><\/noindex><\/p>\n

Kushtet e testit<\/h3>\n

\nNj\u00eb sh\u00ebnim i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm: ne b\u00ebm\u00eb krahasimin pa optimizime t\u00eb tjera, jo si nj\u00eb benchmark. Me konfigurimin shtes\u00eb t\u00eb sistemeve n\u00eb cloud, rezultatet do t\u00eb ishin me siguri m\u00eb t\u00eb mira. <\/p>\n

Kemi: dy makina virtuale me 8 vCPU dhe 64 GB RAM me disqe FLASH 10.000 IOPS. <\/p>\n

Makin\u00eb virtuale e par\u00eb - me Windows Server 2016 dhe e instaluar 1C 8.3.10.2580, p\u00ebr makin\u00ebn virtuale t\u00eb dyt\u00eb mor\u00ebm nj\u00eb imazh t\u00eb makin\u00ebs virtuale me baz\u00ebn e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave (Centos + Postgresql) nga Gilev.ru<\/a><\/noindex>. <\/p>\n

Baza e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave Postgresql - nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb rast\u00ebsi, pasi p\u00ebrdorimi i saj \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb af\u00ebr kushteve reale t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb 1C nga klient\u00ebt tan\u00eb. Po, ne b\u00ebm\u00eb teste sintetike, t\u00eb ngjashme me instalimet standarde, pra nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje universale p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjitha pyetjet e bot\u00ebs, por nj\u00eb udh\u00ebzues p\u00ebr analiz\u00ebn tuaj personale. <\/p>\n

E r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme \u00ebsht\u00eb se n\u00eb rastin e p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb arkitektur\u00ebs s\u00eb skedar\u00ebve n\u00eb vend t\u00eb baz\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave, rezultatet e testeve zakonisht jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb larta. Por n\u00eb realitet, ky tip arkitekture p\u00ebrdoret vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr instalime shum\u00eb t\u00eb vogla. K\u00ebtu RuVDS testoi<\/a><\/noindex> n\u00eb arkitektur\u00ebn e skedar\u00ebve. Dhe k\u00ebto jan\u00eb komentet n\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebt\u00eb nga vet\u00eb Vyacheslav Gilyov:<\/a><\/noindex> N\u00ebse flitet p\u00ebr qiran\u00eb e 1C n\u00eb modin e skedar\u00ebve, at\u00ebher\u00eb po, por ajo q\u00eb m\u00eb ndodh t\u00eb shoh punon vet\u00ebm n\u00eb variantin klient-server. Ka kuptim: 1) ose t\u00eb shtohet ky sqarim n\u00eb artikull; 2) ose t\u00eb testohet varianti klient-server, sepse dallimi n\u00eb arkitektur\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb i konsideruesh\u00ebm, dhe varianti i skedar\u00ebve nuk ka funksionalitetin e plot\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Nuk jan\u00eb kryer cil\u00ebsime shtes\u00eb t\u00eb sistemit operativ dhe produktit 1C.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

N\u00eb k\u00ebndin e majt\u00eb t\u00eb ringut \u2014 procesori Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2, 3,00 GHz.<\/p>\n

Procesor\u00ebt<\/h3>\n

<\/p>\n