{"id":82544,"date":"2020-05-22T13:42:33","date_gmt":"2020-05-22T11:42:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/blog\/administrirovanie\/kak-my-proveryali-proizvoditelnost-novyh-proczessorov-v-oblake-dlya-1s-po-testu-gilyova"},"modified":"2020-05-22T13:42:33","modified_gmt":"2020-05-22T11:42:33","slug":"kak-my-proveryali-proizvoditelnost-novyh-proczessorov-v-oblake-dlya-1s-po-testu-gilyova","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/sq\/blog\/administrirovanie\/kak-my-proveryali-proizvoditelnost-novyh-proczessorov-v-oblake-dlya-1s-po-testu-gilyova","title":{"rendered":"Si e kontrolluam performanc\u00ebn e proceseve t\u00eb reja n\u00eb cloud p\u00ebr 1C sipas testit Gilyova","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Si
\n
\nNuk nuk mund t\u00eb hapim Amerik\u00ebn duke th\u00ebn\u00eb se makinat virtuale me procesor\u00eb t\u00eb rinj jan\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb m\u00eb efikase se pajisjet me procesor\u00eb t\u00eb brezit t\u00eb vjet\u00ebr. E r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7ka tjet\u00ebr: kur analizojm\u00eb mund\u00ebsit\u00eb e sistemeve, q\u00eb duken se kan\u00eb karakteristika teknike shum\u00eb t\u00eb ngjashme, rezultati mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb krejt\u00ebsisht i ndrysh\u00ebm. K\u00ebt\u00eb e konfirmuam kur testuam procesor\u00ebt Intel n\u00eb cloud-in ton\u00eb, p\u00ebr t\u00eb par\u00eb se cil\u00ebt prej tyre japin kthimin m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb gjat\u00eb pun\u00ebs me sistemet 1C. <\/p>\n

Spoiler: si\u00e7 tregoi testi yn\u00eb, gjith\u00e7ka varet nga detyra e vendosur. Na arriti t\u00eb zgjidhnim produktin e duhur nga e gjith\u00eb gama e re e procesor\u00ebve Intel, i cili ofroi nj\u00eb rritje mbres\u00ebl\u00ebn\u00ebse t\u00eb performanc\u00ebs fal\u00eb faktit se n\u00eb Intel Xeon Gold 6244 ka m\u00eb pak b\u00ebrthama, dhe p\u00ebr \u00e7do b\u00ebrtham\u00eb ka m\u00eb shum\u00eb L3 cache dhe nj\u00eb frekuenc\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb taktike \u2014 si baz\u00ebs ashtu edhe n\u00eb modin Turbo Boost. Me fjal\u00eb t\u00eb tjera, k\u00ebta procesor\u00eb jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb mir\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrballuar detyrat me k\u00ebrkes\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb burimesh p\u00ebr \u00e7do nj\u00ebsin\u00eb e performanc\u00ebs\/lek. P\u00ebr 1C, kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00ebse e p\u00ebrshtatshme: me procesor\u00ebt e rinj, aplikacionet n\u00eb 1C n\u00eb cloud-in ton\u00eb filluan dosido t\u00eb \u201eshk\u00eblqejn\u00eb\u201c.<\/p>\n

Tani tani, le tregojm\u00eb se si e kemi realizuar testimin. M\u00eb posht\u00eb jan\u00eb rezultatet e testeve sintetike t\u00eb Gilev-it. Mund t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbejn\u00eb si orientim, por gjithsesi duhet t\u00eb kontrolloni p\u00ebrdorimin e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb n\u00eb detyrat tuaja. <\/a><\/noindex><\/p>\n

Kushtet e testit<\/h3>\n

\nV\u00ebrejtje e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme: ne kemi b\u00ebr\u00eb krahasimin pa optimizime shtes\u00eb, dhe jo nj\u00eb benchmark. Me konfigurimin e duhur t\u00eb sistemeve n\u00eb cloud, rezultatet do t\u00eb jen\u00eb patjet\u00ebr m\u00eb t\u00eb mira. <\/p>\n

T\u00eb dh\u00ebna: dy makina virtuale me 8 vCPU dhe 64 GB RAM me disqe FLASH 10.000 IOPS. <\/p>\n

Makin\u00eb virtuale e par\u00eb \u2014 me Windows Server 2016 dhe me 1C 8.3.10.2580 t\u00eb instaluar, p\u00ebr makin\u00ebn e dyt\u00eb mor\u00ebm nj\u00eb imazh t\u00eb makin\u00ebs virtuale me nj\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnash (Centos + Postgresql) nga Gilev.ru<\/a><\/noindex>. <\/p>\n

Baza e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave Postgresql \u2014 nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb rast\u00ebsore, pasi p\u00ebrdorimi i saj i p\u00ebrgjigjet m\u00eb s\u00eb miri kushteve t\u00eb v\u00ebrteta t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb 1C nga klient\u00ebt tan\u00eb. Po, ne kemi b\u00ebr\u00eb teste sintetike, t\u00eb ngjashme me instalimet tipike, pra, kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje universale p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjitha pyetjet e Universit, por nj\u00eb orientim p\u00ebr analiz\u00ebn tuaj t\u00eb vet\u00eb. <\/p>\n

\u00cbsht\u00eb e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme q\u00eb n\u00eb rastin e p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb arkitektur\u00ebs s\u00eb skedar\u00ebve n\u00eb vend t\u00eb baz\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave, rezultatet e testeve zakonisht jan\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb larta. Por n\u00eb\u73b0\u5b9e, ky tip arkitekture p\u00ebrdoret vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr instalime shum\u00eb t\u00eb vogla. Ja k\u00ebtu RuVDS ka testuar<\/a><\/noindex> n\u00eb arkitektur\u00ebn e skedar\u00ebve. Dhe ja \u00e7far\u00eb tha k\u00ebt\u00eb rreth saj n\u00eb komentet<\/a><\/noindex> vet\u00eb Vyacheslav Gilev:<\/p>\n

N\u00ebse flasim p\u00ebr qiran\u00eb e 1C n\u00eb modalitetin e skedar\u00ebve, at\u00ebher\u00eb po, por ajo q\u00eb m\u00eb ndodh mua, punon ekskluzivisht n\u00eb variantin klient-server. Ka kuptim: 1) ose ta sqarosh k\u00ebt\u00eb n\u00eb artikull; 2) ose t\u00eb testosh variantin klient-server, sepse diferenca n\u00eb arkitektur\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e konsiderueshme, dhe varianti i skedar\u00ebve nuk ka funksionalitet t\u00eb plot\u00eb.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb asnj\u00eb konfigurim shtes\u00eb i sistemit operativ dhe produktit 1C.<\/p>\n

Procesor\u00ebt<\/h3>\n

<\/p>\n