{"id":97051,"date":"2020-10-15T14:43:34","date_gmt":"2020-10-15T12:43:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/blog\/administrirovanie\/kak-raspoznat-sharlatana-ot-data-science"},"modified":"2020-10-15T14:43:34","modified_gmt":"2020-10-15T12:43:34","slug":"kak-raspoznat-sharlatana-ot-data-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prohoster.info\/sq\/blog\/administrirovanie\/kak-raspoznat-sharlatana-ot-data-science","title":{"rendered":"Si t\u00eb dalloni nj\u00eb mashtrues n\u00eb Data Science?","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Si<\/a><\/noindex>
\nE mund t\u00eb keni d\u00ebgjuar p\u00ebr analist\u00ebt, specialist\u00ebt e m\u00ebsimit t\u00eb makinerive dhe inteligjenc\u00ebs artificiale, por a keni d\u00ebgjuar ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb p\u00ebr ata q\u00eb paguhen padrejt\u00ebsisht? Takoni sharlatanin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave<\/strong>! K\u00ebta dinak\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt t\u00ebrhiqen nga puna fitimprur\u00ebse, krijojn\u00eb nj\u00eb reputacion t\u00eb keq p\u00ebr specialist\u00ebt e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrpunimit t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb material, shqyrtojm\u00eb se si t\u00eb zbuloni k\u00ebta njer\u00ebz.
\n<\/a><\/noindex><\/p>\n

Sharlatan\u00ebt e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave jan\u00eb kudo<\/h2>\n

\nSharlatan\u00ebt e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave jan\u00eb aq t\u00eb aft\u00eb t\u00eb fshihen n\u00eb shikim t\u00eb hapur, saq\u00eb ju mund t\u00eb jini nj\u00eb prej tyre<\/i>, madje pa e kuptuar. Me siguri, organizata juaj ka mbajtur k\u00ebta dinak\u00eb p\u00ebr vite me radh\u00eb, por ka nj\u00eb lajm t\u00eb mir\u00eb: ata jan\u00eb t\u00eb leht\u00eb p\u00ebr t'u identifikuar, n\u00ebse e dini se \u00e7far\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoni.
\nShenja e par\u00eb paralajm\u00ebruese \u00ebsht\u00eb mungesa e kuptimit se analiza dhe statistika jan\u00eb disiplina shum\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshme<\/strong>. N\u00eb vazhdim, do ta shpjegoj k\u00ebt\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Disiplina t\u00eb ndryshme<\/h2>\n

\nStatistikat trajnohen p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb p\u00ebrfundime mbi at\u00eb q\u00eb kalon p\u00ebrtej t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb tyre, analist\u00ebt jan\u00eb trajnuar p\u00ebr t\u00eb studiuar p\u00ebrmbajtjen e nj\u00eb grupi t\u00eb dh\u00ebnash. Me fjal\u00eb t\u00eb tjera, analist\u00ebt nxjerrin p\u00ebrfundime mbi at\u00eb q\u00eb p\u00ebrmban t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e tyre, nd\u00ebrsa statistikat nxjerrin p\u00ebrfundime mbi at\u00eb q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebna. Analist\u00ebt ndihmojn\u00eb n\u00eb formulimin e pyetjeve t\u00eb mira (t\u00eb hedhin hipoteza), nd\u00ebrsa statistikat ndihmojn\u00eb n\u00eb marrjen e p\u00ebrgjigjeve t\u00eb mira (t\u00eb testojn\u00eb hipoteza).<\/p>\n

Ekzistojn\u00eb gjithashtu role hibrid\u00eb t\u00eb \u00e7uditshme, kur nj\u00eb njeri p\u00ebrpiqet t\u00eb q\u00ebndroj\u00eb n\u00eb dy karrige... Pse jo? Parimi kryesor i shkenc\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave: n\u00ebse po merret me pasiguri, nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorni t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn<\/i> pik\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnash p\u00ebr hipoteza dhe verifikim. Kur t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat jan\u00eb t\u00eb kufizuara, pasiguria t\u00eb detyron t\u00eb zgjedh\u00ebsh mes statistik\u00ebs ose analiz\u00ebs. Shpjegimi<\/i> k\u00ebtu<\/i><\/a><\/noindex>.<\/p>\n

Pa statistika, do t\u00eb ngecni dhe nuk do t\u00eb jeni n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb kuptoni n\u00ebse pohimi i sapoformuluar reziston kritik\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa pa analiz\u00eb l\u00ebvizni me an\u00ebshtje, me pak shpres\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb zbutur t\u00eb panjohur\u00ebn. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb zgjedhje e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Dalja e sharlatanit nga kjo situat\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb injoroj\u00eb at\u00eb dhe pastaj t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb sikur \u00ebsht\u00eb i befasuar nga ajo q\u00eb zbulohet papritmas. Logjika e verifikimit t\u00eb hipotezave statistikore reduktohet n\u00eb pyetje: a na befasojn\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat mjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb ndryshuar mendimin ton\u00eb? Si mund t\u00eb befasohemi nga t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat, n\u00ebse i kemi par\u00eb tashm\u00eb?<\/p>\n

Koh\u00eb pas kohe, kur sharlatan\u00ebt gjejn\u00eb nj\u00eb model, ata frym\u00ebzohen, pastaj verifikojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat t\u00eb dh\u00ebna<\/i> p\u00ebr t\u00eb s\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs model<\/i>, p\u00ebr t\u00eb publikuar rezultatin me nj\u00eb vler\u00eb p legjitime ose dy, pran\u00eb teoris\u00eb s\u00eb tyre. K\u00ebshtu ata po t\u00eb g\u00ebnjejn\u00eb (ndoshta edhe vetveten). Nj\u00eb vler\u00eb p e till\u00eb nuk ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi n\u00ebse nuk e mban hipotez\u00ebn t\u00ebnde. n\u00eb<\/b> se si kan\u00eb shqyrtuar t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e tyre. Sharlatan\u00ebt imitojn\u00eb veprimet e analist\u00ebve dhe statistikant\u00ebve pa kuptuar arsyet. Si rezultat, t\u00eb gjith\u00eb fush\u00ebn e shkenc\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave merr nj\u00eb reputacion t\u00eb keq.<\/p>\n

Statistikan\u00ebt e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb arrijn\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimet e tyre.<\/h2>\n

\nFal\u00eb nj\u00eb reputacioni pothuajse mistik t\u00eb specialist\u00ebve t\u00eb statistik\u00ebs, q\u00eb merren me arsyetime rigoroz, sasia e informacionit t\u00eb rrem\u00eb n\u00eb Data Science \u00ebsht\u00eb rekord. \u00cbsht\u00eb e leht\u00eb t\u00eb mashtrosh dhe t\u00eb mos kapesh, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht n\u00ebse viktima pa dyshim mendon se gjith\u00e7ka ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me ekuacionet dhe t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat. Nj\u00eb grup t\u00eb dh\u00ebnash \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb grup t\u00eb dh\u00ebnash, apo jo? Jo. Ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi si e p\u00ebrdor at\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Fatmir\u00ebsisht, ju nevojitet vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb shenj\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb kapur sharlatan\u00ebt: ata \"rihapin Amerik\u00ebn pas dat\u00ebs\". Rihapin fenomene q\u00eb ata tashm\u00eb e din\u00eb se jan\u00eb t\u00eb pranishme n\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebna. <\/p>\n

Ndryshe nga sharlatan\u00ebt, analist\u00ebt e mir\u00eb \u2014 nuk kan\u00eb paragjykime dhe e kuptojn\u00eb se idet\u00eb frym\u00ebzuese mund t\u00eb ken\u00eb shum\u00eb shpjegime t\u00eb ndryshme. N\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn koh\u00eb, statistikan\u00ebt e mir\u00eb e p\u00ebrcaktojn\u00eb me kujdes p\u00ebrfundimin e tyre para se ta nxjerrin at\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Analist\u00ebt jan\u00eb t\u00eb shkarkuar nga p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsia\u2026 derisa ata t\u00eb dalin p\u00ebrtej t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb tyre. N\u00ebse ata ndjejn\u00eb tundimin t\u00eb shpallin di\u00e7ka q\u00eb nuk e kan\u00eb par\u00eb, kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb pun\u00eb krejt\u00ebsisht tjet\u00ebr. Ata duhet \"t\u00eb heqin k\u00ebpuc\u00ebt\" e analistit dhe \"t\u00eb veshin\" k\u00ebpuc\u00ebt e statistikani. N\u00eb fund t\u00eb fundit, pavar\u00ebsisht nga emri i zyrtarizuar, nuk ka rregull q\u00eb t\u00eb mos mund t\u00eb studiojn\u00eb t\u00eb dy profesionet n\u00ebse duan. Vet\u00ebm mos i ngat\u00ebrro.<\/p>\n

N\u00ebse e dini mir\u00eb statistik\u00ebn, nuk do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb dini mir\u00eb analitik\u00ebn, dhe anasjelltas. N\u00ebse dikush p\u00ebrpiqet t'ju thot\u00eb t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebn, \u00ebsht\u00eb mir\u00eb t\u00eb jeni t\u00eb kujdessh\u00ebm. N\u00ebse ky njeri ju thot\u00eb se \u00ebsht\u00eb e lejuar t\u00eb b\u00ebni p\u00ebrfundime statistike mbi t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat q\u00eb keni shqyrtuar tashm\u00eb, kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb arsye p\u00ebr t\u00eb qen\u00eb dyfish t\u00eb kujdesh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n

Shpjegime t\u00eb \u00e7uditshme<\/h2>\n

\nDuke v\u00ebzhguar sharlatan\u00ebt e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave n\u00eb natyr\u00eb, do t\u00eb vini re se ata e duan t\u00eb shpikin tregime fantastike p\u00ebr t\u00eb \"shpjeguar\" t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e v\u00ebzhguara. Sa m\u00eb akademik\u00eb, aq m\u00eb mir\u00eb. Nuk ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi se k\u00ebto histori jan\u00eb rregulluar pas ngjarjeve.<\/p>\n

Kur sharlatan\u00ebt b\u00ebjn\u00eb k\u00ebshtu \u2014 le t'ju them pa hezitim \u2014 ata g\u00ebnjejn\u00eb. Asnj\u00eb sasi ekuacionesh apo koncepte t\u00eb bukura nuk kompenson faktin q\u00eb ata kan\u00eb ofruar prova zero p\u00ebr versionet e tyre. Mos u \u00e7udisni sa t\u00eb \u00e7uditshme jan\u00eb shpjegimet e tyre.<\/p>\n

Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb e nj\u00ebjta gj\u00eb si t\u00eb demonstrosh aft\u00ebsit\u00eb e tua \"ekstra-sensoriale\", duke par\u00eb fillimisht kartat n\u00eb duar dhe pastaj duke parashikuar se \u00e7far\u00eb mban\u2026 \u00e7far\u00eb do mbash. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrllogaritje e pasme dhe profesioni i shkenc\u00ebtarit t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave \u00ebsht\u00eb plot me t\u00eb.<\/p>\n

\"Si<\/p>\n

Analist\u00ebt thon\u00eb: \"Sapo e pe rrug\u00ebn me mbret\u00ebresh\u00ebn e buba\". Statistik\u00ebt thon\u00eb: \"E kam shkruar hipotez\u00ebn time n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb cop\u00eb letre p\u00ebrpara se t\u00eb fillonim. Le t\u00eb luajm\u00eb, t\u00eb shohim disa t\u00eb dh\u00ebna dhe t\u00eb shohim n\u00ebse kam t\u00eb drejt\u00eb\". Sharlatan\u00ebt thon\u00eb: \"E dija q\u00eb do t\u00eb shkoje me k\u00ebt\u00eb mbret\u00ebresh\u00eb buba, sepse\u2026\" <\/p>\n

Pjes\u00ebtimi i t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb zgjidhje e shpejt\u00eb p\u00ebr problemin q\u00eb k\u00ebrkon \u00e7do njeri.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\nKur t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb shumta, duhet t\u00eb zgjedh\u00ebsh midis statistik\u00ebs dhe analiz\u00ebs, por kur t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat jan\u00eb t\u00eb bollshme, ka nj\u00eb mund\u00ebsi t\u00eb shk\u00eblqyer p\u00ebr t\u00eb shfryt\u00ebzuar analiz\u00ebn pa mashtrim. dhe<\/i> Statistika. Ju keni mbrojtjen perfekte nga sharlatan\u00ebt \u2014 kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb pjes\u00ebtimi i t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave dhe, n\u00eb mendimin tim, kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb ideja m\u00eb e fuqishme n\u00eb Shkenc\u00ebn e t\u00eb Dh\u00ebnave. <\/p>\n

P\u00ebr t\u00eb mbrojtur veten nga sharlatan\u00ebt, gj\u00ebja e vetme q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebni \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb siguroheni q\u00eb mbani disa t\u00eb dh\u00ebna testuese jasht\u00eb syve t\u00eb tyre kurioz\u00eb, dhe pastaj t\u00eb trajtoni gjith\u00e7ka tjet\u00ebr si analiz\u00eb. Kur hasni nj\u00eb teori q\u00eb rrezikoni ta pranoni, p\u00ebrdoreni at\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar situat\u00ebn, dhe pastaj hapni t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat tuaja sekrete p\u00ebr t\u00eb testuar n\u00ebse teoria nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb budall\u00ebk. \u00cbsht\u00eb kaq e thjesht\u00eb!<\/p>\n

\"Si
\nSigurohuni q\u00eb askush t\u00eb mos lejohet t\u00eb shikoj\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat testuese gjat\u00eb faz\u00ebs s\u00eb hulumtimit. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb, p\u00ebrmbajuni t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave hulumtuese. T\u00eb dh\u00ebnat testuese nuk duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren p\u00ebr analiz\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Ky \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb hap i madh p\u00ebrpara n\u00eb krahasim me at\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin njer\u00ebzit jan\u00eb m\u00ebsuar n\u00eb epok\u00ebn e \"t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb vogla\", ku ju nevojitet t\u00eb shpjegoni se nga e dini at\u00eb q\u00eb know, p\u00ebr t\u00eb bindur p\u00ebrfundimisht njer\u00ebzit se ju me t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb dini di\u00e7ka.<\/p>\n

T\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat rregulla zbatohen p\u00ebr ML\/AI.<\/h2>\n

\nDisa sharlatan\u00eb q\u00eb pretendojn\u00eb t\u00eb jen\u00eb ekspert\u00eb n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e ML\/AI, gjithashtu jan\u00eb t\u00eb leht\u00eb p\u00ebr t'u zbuluar. Ju do t'i kapni ata ashtu si do t\u00eb kapnit \u00e7do inxhinier tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb keq: \"zgjidhje\" q\u00eb ata p\u00ebrpiqen t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuan, vazhdimisht d\u00ebshtojn\u00eb. Nj\u00eb shenj\u00eb e hershme paralajm\u00ebruese - mungesa e eksperienc\u00ebs me gjuh\u00ebt dhe bibliotekat standarde t\u00eb programimit t\u00eb industris\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Por si duhet t\u00eb veproni me njer\u00ebzit q\u00eb krijojn\u00eb sisteme q\u00eb duken funksionale? Si t\u00eb dini se ka di\u00e7ka t\u00eb dyshimt\u00eb? Zbatoni t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn rregull! Sharlatani \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb karakter i keq q\u00eb ju tregon se sa mir\u00eb ka punuar modeli\u2026 me t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat t\u00eb dh\u00ebna q\u00eb ata p\u00ebrdor\u00ebn p\u00ebr ta nd\u00ebrtuar modelin.<\/p>\n

N\u00ebse keni nd\u00ebrtuar nj\u00eb sistem t\u00eb \u00e7mendur t\u00eb m\u00ebsimit t\u00eb makinerive, si t\u00eb dini se sa i mir\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb ai? Nuk do ta dini p\u00ebrpara se ta tregoni q\u00eb punon me t\u00eb dh\u00ebna t\u00eb reja, q\u00eb nuk i ka par\u00eb m\u00eb par\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Kur keni par\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat p\u00ebrpara parashikimit - \u00ebsht\u00eb e dyshimt\u00eb. parashikim.<\/i>referimi.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\nKur keni mjaft t\u00eb dh\u00ebna p\u00ebr t'i ndar\u00eb, nuk keni nevoj\u00eb t\u00eb referoheni n\u00eb bukurin\u00eb e formulave tuaja p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar projektin (nj\u00eb zakoni i vjet\u00ebr q\u00eb e shoh kudo, jo vet\u00ebm n\u00eb shkenc\u00eb). Ju mund t\u00eb thoni: \"E di q\u00eb funksionon, sepse mund t\u00eb marr nj\u00eb set t\u00eb dh\u00ebnash q\u00eb nuk e kam par\u00eb m\u00eb par\u00eb dhe t\u00eb parashikoj sakt\u00eb se \u00e7far\u00eb do t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb\u2026 dhe do t\u00eb kem t\u00eb drejt\u00eb. P\u00ebrs\u00ebri dhe p\u00ebrs\u00ebri.\"<\/i><\/p>\n

Testimi i modelit\/testimi tuaj me t\u00eb dh\u00ebna t\u00eb reja \u00ebsht\u00eb baza m\u00eb e mir\u00eb p\u00ebr besimin.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\nNuk e p\u00ebrballoj sharlatan\u00ebt e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave. Nuk m\u00eb intereson n\u00ebse opinioni juaj mb\u00ebshtetet n\u00eb fakte t\u00eb ndryshme. Nuk m\u00eb impresionon bukuria e shpjegimeve. M\u00eb trego se si funksionon teoria\/jasht\u00eb modelit tuaj (dhe vazhdon t\u00eb funksionoj\u00eb) n\u00eb nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnash t\u00eb reja q\u00eb keni par\u00eb ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebrtet testimi i q\u00ebndrueshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb mendimit tuaj.<\/p>\n

K\u00ebrkoni ndihm\u00ebn e specialist\u00ebve n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e Shkenc\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb Dh\u00ebnave.<\/h2>\n

\nN\u00ebse d\u00ebshiron q\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00eb respektojn\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb ata q\u00eb e kuptojn\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb humor, ndalu t\u00eb fshihesh pas ekuacioneve t\u00eb \u00e7uditshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetur paragjykimet personale. Trego se \u00e7far\u00eb ke. N\u00ebse d\u00ebshiron q\u00eb ata q\u00eb \"kuptuan\" ta shohin teorin\u00eb\/ modelin t\u00ebnd si di\u00e7ka m\u00eb shum\u00eb se thjesht poezi frym\u00ebzuese, ke guximin t\u00eb organizosh nj\u00eb shfaqje madh\u00ebshtore t\u00eb sa mir\u00eb funksionon n\u00eb nj\u00eb grup t\u00eb ri t\u00eb dh\u00ebnash... para d\u00ebshmitar\u00ebve!<\/p>\n

Drejtimi p\u00ebr menaxher\u00ebt<\/h2>\n

\nRefuzoni t\u00eb pranoni me seriozitet \u00e7do \"ide\" p\u00ebr t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat, derisa ato t\u00eb sillen n\u00eb prova mbi t\u00eb rejat<\/i> e dh\u00ebnave. A nuk d\u00ebshiron t\u00eb b\u00ebsh p\u00ebrpjekje? Q\u00ebndro n\u00eb analiza, por mos u mb\u00ebshtet te k\u00ebto ide - ato jan\u00eb t\u00eb pasigurt dhe nuk jan\u00eb testuar p\u00ebr besueshm\u00ebri. Gjithashtu, kur nj\u00eb organizat\u00eb ka t\u00eb dh\u00ebna n\u00eb boll\u00ebk, nuk ka asnj\u00eb penges\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb ndarjen themelore n\u00eb shkenc\u00eb dhe ta mbash at\u00eb n\u00eb nivelin e infrastruktur\u00ebs, duke kontrolluar qasjen n\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat testuese p\u00ebr statistika. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb e shk\u00eblqyer p\u00ebr t\u00eb parandaluar p\u00ebrpjekjet p\u00ebr t\u00eb t\u00eb mashtruar!<\/p>\n

N\u00ebse d\u00ebshiron t\u00eb shoh\u00ebsh m\u00eb shum\u00eb shembuj t\u00eb sharlatan\u00ebve q\u00eb po e mendojn\u00eb di\u00e7ka t\u00eb keqe - k\u00ebtu \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb tem\u00eb e mrekullueshme n\u00eb Twitter<\/a><\/noindex>.<\/p>\n

P\u00ebrfundime<\/h2>\n

\nKur t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat jan\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb pakta p\u00ebr ndarje, vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb sharlatan p\u00ebrpiqet t\u00eb ndjek\u00eb me rigorozitet frym\u00ebzimin, duke e hapur Amerik\u00ebn retrospektivisht, duke ri-rishikuar fenomenet, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat tashm\u00eb dihet se ekzistojn\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebna, dhe duke e quajtur befasin\u00eb statistike t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme. Kjo i ndan ata nga analisti pa paragjykim q\u00eb merret me frym\u00ebzimin, dhe statistikani k\u00ebrkues q\u00eb ofron prova n\u00eb parashikimin.<\/p>\n

Kur ka shum\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebna, zhvillo nj\u00eb zakon p\u00ebr t\u00eb ndar\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat, k\u00ebshtu do t\u00eb kesh t\u00eb mirat e t\u00eb dyja bot\u00ebve! Sigurohu t\u00eb b\u00ebsh analiza dhe statistika ndaras p\u00ebr n\u00ebngrupet e ndryshme t\u00eb grumbullit origjinal t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave.<\/p>\n