Ingabe ufuna ukujabula kancane? Zama ukuba ngohamba phambili ebhizinisini lakho

Lena indaba yalabo okuwukuphela kokufana kwabo no-Einstein okuyisiphithiphithi esedeskini labo.
Isithombe sedeski lesazi sefiziksi esikhulu sathathwa emahoreni ambalwa ngemva kokufa kwakhe, ngo-April 28, 1955, ePrinceton, eNew Jersey.

Inganekwane Yenkosi

Wonke amasiko adalwe ngumuntu asekelwe kuma-archetypes. Izinganekwane zasendulo zamaGreki, amanoveli amakhulu, "Game of Thrones" - izithombe ezifanayo, noma ngolimi lwe-IT, "amaphethini", sihlangana nathi kaningi. Lo mbono ngokwawo usuvele uyindawo evamile: ukuba khona kwesisekelo esisodwa sezimpande zazo zonke izindaba zomhlaba kwaqashelwa yibo bobabili umbhali wencwadi ethi "The Hero with a Thousand Faces" kanye nama-postmodernists amaningi aqala ukuluka isikhathi eside. -itshele izindaba ezifana nezindaba zeBhayibheli kanye nezinganekwane ezifanayo ngoZeus, uHercules noPerseus ezimweni ezintsha.

Olunye uhlobo olunjalo lwe-archetype ngumuntu owazi ubuciko bakhe ekupheleleni. I-Virtuoso. Guru. Bulgakov, encwadini yakhe edume kakhulu, wabiza iqhawe elinjalo ngokuqondile - Master. Isibonelo sokuqala esifika emqondweni we-virtuoso enjalo umseshi ohlakaniphile okwazi ukuphenya icala futhi athole isigebengu ngokusekelwe emibonweni eminingana ebonakala ingahlobene, enezimo kakhulu. Lesi yisakhiwo esikhohlisayo kangangokuthi singabonakala: kungaba isikhathi esingakanani lokhu kuthakazelisa ukusifunda/ukubukela esikrinini? Kodwa kufanele uvume: indaba enjalo ayilokothi iyeke ukuthakazelisa. Lokhu kusho ukuthi ngasizathu simbe sijatshuliswa isithombe somuntu oye wafinyelela ukuphelela emsebenzini wakhe wobuciko.

Eqinisweni, le archetype ingenye yezinto ezisijabulisa kakhulu, ngisho noma singakakulungeli ukukuvuma kithi. Emasontweni ambalwa edlule kuphela, ngibe yingxenye yengxoxo yobungcweti kabili kakade. Esimweni sokuqala, bengibukele ifilimu yesenzo evamile, kodwa ejabulisa kakhulu mayelana nomseshi okhaliphile, futhi ngezwa kwenye yezindawo ezingomakhelwane: “Nami ngifuna ukuba nolwazi olunzulu ngomsebenzi wami njengaye.". Esimweni sesibili, omunye wabangane bami waqala ukukhuluma ngokuthi uzohlale uhlangana nomuntu oqonda ibhizinisi lakho kangcono kunawe. Lokhu kusabela okubukhoma nezingxoxo ezivela empilweni yangempela zibonisa ukuthi sinamandla kangakanani isifiso sethu sokuba ohamba phambili ebhizinisini lethu. Kodwa kanjani lokho? Futhi ngani? Ake sizame ukukuqonda.

Umuntu obuthakathaka waba kanjani “uMthakathi”

Ebuyela embuzweni wabaseshi. Sengivele ngiyilungisile kwenye yami isihloko umbuzo wokuthi i-erudition idlala yiphi indima ezimpilweni zethu. Futhi njengesibonelo, ucaphune uhla lwamakhono kaSherlock Holmes, oluchazwe ku- “A Study in Scarlet” - uhlu oluningiliziwe (lunikezwe ekuqaleni kwaleyo ndatshana) lwahlanganiswa nguDokotela owaziwayo uWatson, uHolmes's. umngane. Njengoba sibona, i-erudition kaHolmes yayingebanzi, kodwa ulwazi lwakhe ezindaweni ezihlobene nomsebenzi wakhe wamanje lwalujule kakhulu. Wayenentshisekelo kukho konke okungamsiza ngokwethiyori ukuthi angene emzileni. Futhi washiya okunye ngaphandle kokunaka kwakhe.

Kungani lesi sikhathi sibaluleke kangaka? Ngoba inikeza umkhondo ku-Sherlock phenomenon. Pho kungani ethole impumelelo engaka ebhizinisini lakhe? Ingabe wazalwa engungqondongqondo? Cha, wamane waba i-virtuoso ngomsebenzi oqhubekayo kuye.

Ngifuna ukuxoxa indaba yomsubathi okwathi, ngokuba ngomunye wabadlali baseRussia abaphumelele kakhulu kuNational Hockey League (eNyakatho Melika), waqashelwa njengomunye wabadlali abayikhulu abakhulu kule ligi. Ukuphela komdlali we-hockey emhlabeni owawina iMidlalo Yama-Olympic, Umqhudelwano Womhlaba, iStanley Cup neGagarin Cup. Lawa amaqiniso omile we-encyclopedic. Kodwa ukuze uqonde ubukhulu bangempela balo mdlali, kungcono ukubuka izikhathi ezimbalwa zomdlalo wakhe. Ngakho-ke, hlangana no-Pavel Datsyuk, owaqanjwa ngokuthi "I-Magic Man" ngabalingani bakhe be-NHL, kanye "noHoudini", ngemuva komunye wemilingo emikhulu emlandweni.

Uke wayibona indlela enza ngayo ngobuchule izimbangi ezintathu noma ezine? Noma ingabe imenza kanjani unozinti abe novalo ngesikhathi sokudubulana (okufana “nama-penalty” ebhola)? Ihamba ngasiphi isivinini nokuvumelana nezimo?

I-Datsyuk iyathakazelisa hhayi nje ngoba idlala kahle. Zimbili izinto ezimaka indlela yakhe yokudlala. Okokuqala nje, udlala ngobuhlakani. Akagcini nje ngokukwazi ukubala inkambo yomdlalo, kodwa futhi uyisazi sokusebenza kwengqondo esihle. I-Datsyuk ingenza umphikisi wakhe awe ngaphandle kokumthinta. Okwesibili, umane nje uyingcweti ngenduku yakhe kanye nesiketi sakhe sokushibilika. Yilokhu okumvumela ukuthi ashaye igoli, isibonelo, ngisho nangemva komugqa wamagoli (kusuka ku-engeli eyinegethivu). Futhi njengoba singabona kuvidiyo elandelayo, lesi akusona nje isipho semvelo - kuwumphumela wokuqeqeshwa okuhlosiwe.

U-Pavel akayena umdlali we-hockey omkhulu kakhulu, ngokungafani, uthi, u-Ovechkin noMalkin, owaziwa kakhulu. Futhi ngokusobala wayengenalo ithalenta elizalwa: lapho eseyingane, wayengabhekwa njengomdlali we-hockey onethalente, futhi wangena ku-NHL okusalungiswa (ukukhethwa kwaminyaka yonke kwabadlali abasha kwi-League) ngenombolo 171 - okungukuthi, kude kakhulu ne-NHL. i-rookie engcono kakhulu yalowo nyaka. Abaningi ekuqaleni angiqondangaWenzani eqhweni? Kuze kube, onyakeni wakhe wesithathu edlala, waphinda kathathu amagoli akhe awashayele isizini. Futhi konke lokhu kusitshela ukuthi “Umthakathi” uziqeqeshe ngempela. Ngicabanga ukuthi ngesikhathi sokuqeqeshwa wamane wazibekela imigomo eyengeziwe, njalo eziphonsela inselelo ukuze athuthuke njalo. Ngaphandle kwalokho, ubengeke aliphathe ngobunyoninco leli puck futhi anyakaze kamnandi eqhweni. Yena ngokwakhe wahlekisa kuphela kwenye yezingxoxo zakhe nezintatheli zaseMelika ukuthi ebusheni bakhe eRussia wayenemali ye-puck eyodwa kuphela, ngakho kwadingeka afunde ukuyisebenzisa isikhathi eside ngangokunokwenzeka.

Kungani ulwela ukuba abangcono kakhulu?

I-Datsyuk iyisibonelo esisodwa sendlela umuntu angathola ngayo imiphumela engavamile ebhizinisini lakhe alithandayo ngokuzithuthukisa. Ekuqaleni kwesihloko, sikhulume kakhulu ngezincwadi - ake sikhumbule umlobi uNabokov, owabhala ekuqaleni umsebenzi wakhe odume kakhulu, "Lolita" ngesiNgisi, wabe esewuhumushela olimini lwesiRashiya. Ungacabanga ukuthi umuntu olimi lwakhe lwesiRashiya angafunda isiFulentshi esanele sokucabanga kuso, nesiNgisi esanele ukubhala amanoveli? Sengihlale phesheya iminyaka eyi-8, futhi impilo isangifaka emlilweni wehlazo ngenxa yamagama ami. Kodwa ulimi akuwona umsebenzi wami. Ngokungafani noNabokov.

Impumelelo emsebenzini empeleni ibaluleke kakhulu kunalokho esikucabangayo. Futhi akalinganiswa ngemali kuphela. Ngingasho ngisho ukuthi imali ingalahla ikhampasi yemigomo yobungcweti, okungenzeka iqondiswe enyakatho ehlukile. Angifuni ukungabi nasisekelo, kodwa manje angikwazi ukucaphuna ngokunembile izifundo ezibonisa ukuthi ukugqugquzelwa kwabasebenzi akunqunywa kuphela ngezisusa zemali (uma ufuna, ungaphenya ezinqolobaneni zezincwadi ezifana ne-Harvard Business Review). Ukuze sithole ukwaneliseka emsebenzini, sidinga okunye. Futhi lokho okunye enyakatho kungaba isifiso sokuba ohamba phambili ebhizinisini lakho. Futhi uma sicabangela ukuthi sichitha cishe ingxenye enkulu yokuphila kwethu (ngaphandle kwesikhathi sokulala) emsebenzini, kungaba kuhle ukuzizwa sanelisekile emsebenzini nasemsebenzini ngokujwayelekile.

Abantu kukho konke ukuphila kwabo bazama ukuthola injabulo. Emuva ngekhulu le-18, isazi sefilosofi sase-Ukraine u-Skovoroda saqaphela ukuthi injabulo ekuphileni ivela enjabulweni emsebenzini (futhi cishe wayengeyena ngisho ngowokuqala ukucabanga ngalokhu): “Ukujabula kusho ukuzazi wena kanye nemvelo yakho, thatha ingxenye yakho wenze umsebenzi wakho". Akufanele ubone lesi sifiso njengeqiniso lasemhlabeni wonke noma ifomula enhle yokuxazulula zonke izinkinga. Kodwa kimina kubonakala sengathi uma sigxila ekuzithuthukiseni okuqhubekayo, khona-ke kungenzeka ngempela ukuthi singajabula kancane. Ngokuzibekela izinga eliphakeme futhi silinqobe ngokuphindaphindiwe, singathola injabulo eyengeziwe emsebenzini. Mhlawumbe lokhu kuzosinika ukuthula kwengqondo okwengeziwe (ngemuva kwakho konke, sizoba nendawo yethu emnandi), nokuzethemba, ngisho nomuzwa wokubonga. Incwadi ethi “Samurai Without A Sword” ikhuluma ngomunye wamaSamurai waseJapan, owagcina esengumbusi wezwe, kodwa waqala ngokumane ethule isiliphu kumphathi wakhe - futhi waze wazama ukufeza lo msebenzi ngaphezu kwakho konke, kungakhathaliseki ukuthi uhlekisa kanjani. kungase kuzwakale kuye.

Ngisebenzisa igama elithi “craft” ngesizathu. Umsebenzi awuvamile ukumangalisa. Ngokuyisisekelo, lokhu kuwumkhuba onzima futhi oyisicefe.

Indlela yokuba ngongcono kakhulu ayikaze ibe lula. Ingqondo yomuntu kuhleliwe ukuze silandele indlela yokumelana okuncane. Uthanda ukuthola ukwaneliseka ngokushesha. Ngakho-ke, endleleni yokunqoba iziqongo, kuzodingeka ucindezele yonke intando yakho. Kodwa ukuzama ukwenza lokho okwenzayo kuhle, ungawenza umkhuba - phela ingqondo ijwayele ukujwayela.

Bathi isintu manje sibhekene “nenkathi yama-narcisists.” Futhi isifiso sokuba ngohamba phambili emsebenzini womuntu ikakhulukazi ama-smacks wobuze obungafihliwe kanye ne-narcissism. Hhayi-ke, yekela! Masivume kithi ngokwethu: kuzwakala kumnandi ukuzizwa uphakeme. Inqobo nje uma kulungisiwe futhi akususi umhlabathi ongaphansi kwezinyawo zethu. Futhi akungabazeki: maduze noma kamuva kuzoba khona umuntu ozobe esengcono kunawe. Futhi lokhu kuzosho ukuthi kusesekuseni kakhulu ukuthi ume lapho.

Angazi ukuthi ngingawuthola kanjani umsebenzi “wami”. Bathiukuthi "isifiso sokuqonda engikufunayo siwugibe"; Ini "ukuhlala, ucabange, ucabange futhi uqonde ukuthi yini oyifunayo ngempela cishe akunakwenzeka". Okunye cabanga, ukuthi kwanele nje ukubuza imibuzo efanele njengokuthi: uma usalelwe unyaka kuphela wokuphila: uzoyisebenzisa kanjani? Ukube ubunemali eyanele yokuphila, imuphi umsebenzi obungawukhetha? Angazi ukuthi ubani oqinisile, futhi angazi ngempela ukuthi abantu bawuthola kanjani umsebenzi wabo wokuphila. Kodwa ngibabonile abantu amehlo abo akhanya ephuma emsebenzini. Futhi ngabona abadlali be-hockey ababukhoma bekilabhu eyodwa engaphumelelanga kangako, ababegaqa eqhweni ngobuso obungenandaba, behlulwa ngokungenathemba isitha esibuthaka. “Abafuni ngempela ukudlala kangcono?” Ngavele ngacabanga ngaleso sikhathi.

Lena akuyona nje indaba ephathelene nomsebenzi. Ngokuvamile kumayelana nokuphila. UPierre de Coubertin, umsunguli wenhlangano yanamuhla yama-Olympic, wamemezela: “Ngokushesha, phezulu, namandla.” Kungakhathaliseki ukuthi wenzani - uhlelo, shaya amagoli, bhala imibhalo, noma umane uphekele othandekayo wakho isidlo sakusihlwa - lwela ukulenza ngendlela engcono kakhulu. Futhi iphuzu akukhona ukuthi kufanele ube ngongcono kakhulu. Kumayelana nokungami, ungagxili phansi, futhi ujabulele umsebenzi wakho. Akukhona ngokuba - kumayelana nokulwela. Futhi noma ungeyena ungqondongqondo nhlobo, futhi ukufana kwakho kuphela no-Einstein kungukuxosha etafuleni, khumbula ukuthi kwakukhona umfana owaqala i-171st, kodwa waba ngowokuqala.

Source: www.habr.com