In the article I will tell you how I was banned on the English subdomain of Wikipedia for political reasons, how a huge number of information companies censor "He Who Must Not Be Named", really, type in Youtube in the comment "Eric Ciaramella", try to edit, get a 404 error (this is before minus karma, the comment will be deleted, I argue). And I will also tell you what I learned over the past month about the impeachment of Trump and fell in love. The information war is already here. I hope that since I wrote about the end of Roskomnadzor (yes, thatβs what that article should have been called if it werenβt for UFO censorship), you will forgive me for a slightly political article, which, nevertheless, is about censorship in the first place. It also speaks in my favor that this information is still not in the Russian media.
So, I think you know that on January 15, 2020 (the date is correct - we are looking at the Russian wiki, otherwise they already wrote to me here), the US President was impeached. But the story began 1 month before that, on January 5th. On that day, I happened to hear on the telly of a relative that their president would be subject to the final stage of impeachment. I looked at the English Wikipedia to understand what he was accused of, but I did not fully understand and decided to watch their meeting in the Congressional Legal Department live on the CNN Youtube channel, what was my surprise when it turned out that congressmen think that our tanks in Ukraine are killing Ukrainians (according to one of the users, this is ), and we tore apart their territory (I remind you that 95.5% of Crimeans, with a turnout of 89%, voted for secession and joining Russia). And Trump blocked military aid to Ukraine, 400 million $USD, motherfucker (their words) to extort Biden investigations from Zelensky! And he was also accused of believing that it was Ukraine (and not/not only Russia) that influenced the 2016 US elections (Muller report) and they have a (ha) DNC server. Of course, there is such an article ΠΈ but that's some bullshit! Or maybe not. Considering the consequences.
Of course, I did not know then that they were all as one - Democrats! Then I started looking at everything that was on Twitter, etc., and in one place I saw that the possible name of the Trump whistleblower is known. I looked again at the wiki, this information was not there, I tried to add a new topic on the article's discussion page, but the Backlog I was not given this in his name (by the way, this filter is only for Administrators and is not displayed in general , which, as far as I understand, is a violation of the rules, in any case, other Admins complained about it). I was surprised, but gave it up. And then some high-ranking admin wrote to me (left on the discussion page) that I have no right to leave this name on wikipedia in principle! Then I wrote to him, why on earth he is following me, I didnβt edit anything, and this admin set another admin on me, who put me a topic ban on politics ... Ha, while I only have one edit in the section policy. This made me furious. I quickly googled the reason, it turns out !
Then I wrote to some admins I knew asking them to protect me from a topic ban and left a link to reddit. The name was not mentioned anywhere (!). This resulted in a full oversight ban in exactly 10 seconds! And I wrote to the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee, but they also said that they could not unban me (after 2 weeks).
What's the reason? I started looking for her right away. The amount of political horror that spilled out on me just amazed me (had to switch from CNN to Fox News (leftovers not bought by Disney), since there were at least some facts there). You can't use the name Eric Ciaramella on youtube at all. Facebook also censors it. But Twitter is not. Then I decided to subscribe to #EricCiarmella on Twitter (yes, without a, because, as it turned out, there is censorship on Twitter too). Well, I found out something interesting (one ). Namely, that he is dating the daughter of the chief prosecutor in the Trump case, Adam Schiff! This was not known at that time, but I wrote to independent journalists, and .
This is where the most interesting thing began, I decided to follow this nonsense, what is happening there, everything can be expressed with this:
Globally, I figured out the following. Firstly, IG about the US FISA trial in December revealed that the DNC created a fake Steele dossier using money from Hillory Clinton and using information from Russian, Ukrainian and British intelligence. This document was used to open an FBI investigation against Trump for allegedly spying for the Russians and to obtain surveillance orders from the FISA court (Snowden once said what kind of court it was). At the same time, the FBI lied to the FISA court 17 times in a row in order to monitor Carter Page and the Trump entourage. The head of this court (Rosemary M. Collyer) has already resigned, but it is a big question whether this court, reformed after Snowden, will help. The CIA helped too, namely, the director personally put pressure on former FBI director Comey.
It also tells about the director of Fusion GPS and how her husband Bruce Ohr at the FBI did everything to keep the investigation open and Trump not to know about it (even prevented an attempt to inform about the Russians threatening to put the Clinton letters on wikileaks). I'm not talking about Lisa Page and Peter Strok. Haha. Google it, just laugh how they talk about "insurance" against Trump.
So Congress voted to impeach on December 19, and not one Republican voted in favor of it, and one Democrat even switched to the Republican Party. There is no crime in the articles of impeachment (only abuse of power and attempt to obstruct Congress - according to the second Congress prevented itself, since they had to go to court to obtain documents and witnesses legally blocked by Trump). The number of violations committed by the Democrats in this case simply rolls over (denying a minority day for the Republicans, using a witness as a judge, providing all documents a few days before the final vote on weekends, etc.).
But, as they say, the devil is in the details. The biggest thing was with Biden. about it on Russian wikipedia (sic!, I wasn't banned there, so I used it with might and main), where I wrote about it.
In December 2019, as a result of an investigation by Rudy Giulianni and One American News, it became known that there is a high probability that the Bidens are directly involved in laundering $ 14 million through Wirelogic Technology AS and Digitex organization LLP, which ended up offshore in Cyprus (Burisma Holding) through Latvia, as well as $7 billion through Franklin Templenton Investements. Shokin also blames the Biden family for their two-time mercury poisoning (which resulted in clinical death in both cases). The same investigation indicated that Yavanovich gave lists of βnon-investigatedβ to the heir in the position of Shokin and lied when testifying in the Trump impeachment case, and the US Embassy in Ukraine blocks the visas of Shokin and others.
Questions are welcome (both political (about Trump) and computer ones). And figured it all out pretty well. And this is 1% of all the parts that I collected in 1 month.
References
In English only.
//this is about the prosecutor for 1 billion
usatodaynews.live/328-rudolph-giuliani-released-the-findings-of-his-trip-to-ukraine-in-the-case-of-impeachment-trump.html //this is about the poisoning of this prosecutor
// OAN investigations
Like our Navalny.
, in which I retweeted all the work of independent journalists, starting with the first post about the bath.
It's cool, now I'm not so offended that I was banned π It's a pity that VPN on wikipedia is banned, I have to switch to IPv6 LTE and Chrome Canary when I need to fix en Wikipedia!
PS See what how do you like it? Sweetie, right?
Only registered users can participate in the survey. , you are welcome.
Scammer in the picture in the article and https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1200264512017813504?s=20
-
4,4%Similar1
-
13,0%Not similar3
-
82,6%The whole article is nonsense, I will write why in the comments19
23 users voted. 13 users abstained.
Source: habr.com